Re: Tangle: The Game
From: Michael Mendelsohn (keine.Werbung.1300_at_msgid.michael.mendelsohn.de)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Alex Hunsley: "Re: 1+i > i"
- Previous message: Tim Wescott: "Re: how to decide a good sampling rate for sampling a function without obvious frequency?"
- In reply to: Leroy Quet: "Re: Tangle: The Game"
- Next in thread: Leroy Quet: "Re: Tangle: The Game"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:41:30 +0200
Leroy Quet schrieb:
> 4 more things:
>
> 1) It is evident after I played this that it would probably be better,
> rather than making a path of a predetermined number of line-segments,
> that the game simply continue until one player first gets a
> predetermined score, say 10 or 20.
> In this way, players do not have to worry about keeping track of the
> number of moves made. And there is also, with this new rule, no chance
> of a tie.
We've played (2 players) until a player reaches 50, starting with a
square approx. 6x6 inches; although I find that if you increase one
diagonal to 8 inches (and start on a short diagonal corner), you've got
more space.
I've wondered whether the game would be more balanced if the two
diagonals were pre-drawn in a "neutral" color.
Michael
-- Feel the stare of my burning hamster and stop smoking!
- Next message: Alex Hunsley: "Re: 1+i > i"
- Previous message: Tim Wescott: "Re: how to decide a good sampling rate for sampling a function without obvious frequency?"
- In reply to: Leroy Quet: "Re: Tangle: The Game"
- Next in thread: Leroy Quet: "Re: Tangle: The Game"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
