Re: Question: SPACE of super-complex numbers
From: Robert J. Kolker (robert_kolker_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 08/21/04
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: abstract algebra....."
- Previous message: G.L.Narasimham: "Re: Joining two striagt lines with a smooth curve"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Question: SPACE of super-complex numbers"
- Next in thread: Roger Beresford: "Re: Question: SPACE of super-complex numbers"
- Reply: Roger Beresford: "Re: Question: SPACE of super-complex numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 12:45:08 GMT
David Bandel wrote:
> hi.
>
> complex numbers are elegant. the complex plane is simple to grasp. I
> am wondering if there is some extension that would go to the 3rd
> dimension. what kind of hyper-imaginary axis.. and what the unit of
> it would be and represent. (as the unit of the imaginaries represents
> the square root of -1) what would the unit of this 3rd axis' numbers
> be? is there such a thing?
There are no 3 D division algebras over the reals. You have to go from
complex number to quaternions.
All of these manipulations were tried back in the middle of the 19-th
century. Google on the history of quaternions and octernians. Also
Google division algebras. Having a quotient is a strong constraint.
On the other hand you can have rings (multiplication and addition
defined) of any degree over the reals.
Bob Kolker
Bob Kolker
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: abstract algebra....."
- Previous message: G.L.Narasimham: "Re: Joining two striagt lines with a smooth curve"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Question: SPACE of super-complex numbers"
- Next in thread: Roger Beresford: "Re: Question: SPACE of super-complex numbers"
- Reply: Roger Beresford: "Re: Question: SPACE of super-complex numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|