Re: Volleyball topological equivalent to basketball; FusionBarrier Principle the inverse of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

From: Archimedes Plutonium (a_plutonium_at_iw.net)
Date: 08/30/04 

Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 15:01:51 -0500

Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:19:11 -0500 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)

>
> The heart of this new conversation and attack on the Fusion Barrier
> Principle FBP as the inverse of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle HUP
> involves my proof of FBP in that the math theorem of maximum enclosement
> of cylinder in sphere (vice versa) is 2/3 surface-area or volume. So if
> 2/3 maximum is the upper limit of Controlled Fusion as given by the math
> theorem then that 2/3 upper limit should be a critical component of HUP.
>
> So can we say or can we pull out of the heart of HUP the math theorem
> that 2/3 is the upper limit of sphere and cylinder enclosement as per
> volume or surface-area? Does HUP contain that mathematical theorem of
> sphere and cylinder enclosement? I believe it does and that HUP is the
> inverse (should I say topological inverse) of FBP.

So let me see if I can pull this 2/3 sphere/cylinder theorem out of the
heart of what is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. It has to be more
than proven "vacuously". Remember in mathematics were many proofs are
vacuously proven to be true in that the objects under consideration were so
primitive to the testing that it was true vacuously.

It has to be at the heart of the HUP just as this 2/3 theorem is at the
heart of FBP. You see in controlled fusion such as a tokamak there are 2
simultaneous Maxwell Equations involved at the moment of fusion where one
of those Maxwell Equations has a geometrical form of a sphere and the other
has the geometrical form of a cylinder. And so when you enclose cylinder
inside of sphere there is an upper limit per volume and surface-area of
2/3. You see, that 2/3 is the heart of Fusion Barrier.

Now I need to see this 2/3 theorem at the heart of HUP. And it must not be
a vacuously proven heart. So, can we translate HUP solely around the idea
of cylinder versus sphere? I think we can. I think we can realize that a
particle is a sphere and that a cylinder is a wave. That a cylinder is a
corrupted sphere. That a wave is a corrupted particle. And that Planck's
Constant must be like a number that is 2/3 as per the math theorem of
sphere enclosing cylinder.

If I can show that HUP is mathematically equivalent to a series of sphere
enclosing cylinder problems then I will have demonstrated that HUP is the
inverse of FBP. And more importantly that FBP is true because HUP is
categorically true.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Relevant Pages