Re: Volleyball topological equivalent to basketball; FusionBarrier Principle the inverse of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
From: Ian Stirling (root_at_mauve.demon.co.uk)
Date: 08/30/04
- Next message: John R Ramsden: "Re: Prime Number Theorem"
- Previous message: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Assocation does not prove"
- In reply to: Archimedes Plutonium: "Volleyball topological equivalent to basketball; FusionBarrier Principle the inverse of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle"
- Next in thread: eBayer: "Re: Volleyball topological equivalent to basketball; FusionBarrier Principle the inverse of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 30 Aug 2004 21:53:48 GMT
In sci.physics Archimedes Plutonium <a_plutonium@iw.net> wrote:
> While watching the Olympics game of Volleyball a strange impression
> began to ascend over me. I have hated the game of basketball for a long
> time because of dunking where there is no skill in that, yet watching
> volleyball I realize that dunking in basketball is the inverse of
> blocking in volleyball. (P.S. basketball would be fair if dunking were
> outlawed or if dunking received only 1 point instead of 2 points.)
Admit it, you'r really just watching because of the hot pink bakinis.
- Next message: John R Ramsden: "Re: Prime Number Theorem"
- Previous message: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Assocation does not prove"
- In reply to: Archimedes Plutonium: "Volleyball topological equivalent to basketball; FusionBarrier Principle the inverse of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle"
- Next in thread: eBayer: "Re: Volleyball topological equivalent to basketball; FusionBarrier Principle the inverse of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|