# sci.math

By Thread

**7278 messages sorted by:**
[ date ]

**Starting:** *08/30/04*

**Ending:** *09/30/04*

**Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws***Eleaticus (09/30/04)***Fermat's Last theorem (revised)***ben ito (09/30/04)***Fermat's Last Theorem***ben ito (09/30/04)***Polynomials***Isaac (09/30/04)***Singularity***Isaac (09/30/04)***This is Driving Me Insane***Xevious (09/29/04)***Political Statement***Ron Hardin (09/29/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/29/04)***Distribution of sample vaiance***Stig Holmquist (09/29/04)***B SR-cult fraud and corruption (rev a)***eleaticus (09/29/04)***B SR-cult fraud and corruption***eleaticus (09/29/04)***Help solving equation***Håkan Arvidsson (09/29/04)***Linear Programming***J. Francisco Ramos (09/29/04)***Neo-Cons Knee Deep in Caucasus Provocations***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/29/04)***Fast multiplication of polynomials mod p in Mathematica***Trav (09/29/04)***Attempt epsilon-delta***Chris Wagner (09/29/04)***CFP: RelMiCS8 - deadline extended to October 22***Michael Winter (09/29/04)***can you do this***choogu (09/29/04)***topology.....;;***mina_world (09/29/04)***re:640,000,000,000 TO 1***christangey (09/29/04)***sums involving squares of zeta function at even values***François Charton (09/29/04)***Complex roots***Alexandrinne (09/29/04)***Borel Set***Man (09/29/04)***Help with properties of derivatives of functions***Hervé Leleu (09/29/04)***Fourier Transform***Stephen (09/29/04)***Different ways of thinking about Tori***Stephen Lavelle (09/29/04)***Computing the outcome of a permutation***Tudor (09/29/04)***Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***Jose Capco (09/29/04)***Re: Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***Robin Chapman (09/29/04)***Re: Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***Torkel Franzen (09/29/04)***Re: Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***Simon A. Crase (09/29/04)***Re: Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***anon (09/29/04)***Re: Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***James Buddenhagen (09/29/04)***Re: Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***Arturo Magidin (09/29/04)***Re: Where to get the full proof made by Andrew Wiles***mathedman (09/30/04)*

**On localization rings***Jose Capco (09/29/04)***A SR-cult fraud and corruption***eleaticus (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Bill Hobba (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Dirk Van de moortel (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***robert j. kolker (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***RP (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***robert j. kolker (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***eleaticus (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Dirk Van de moortel (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Gregory L. Hansen (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Bill Hobba (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***RP (09/29/04)*

**Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Bilge (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Peter Kinane (09/29/04)***Re: A SR-cult fraud and corruption***Uncle Al (09/29/04)*

**Fermat's last theorem***ben ito (09/29/04)***Another whys***Keckman (09/29/04)***Rowlett's numbering system***JIMMY (09/29/04)***Lie groups***Tyler Smith (09/29/04)***An observation on counting Goldbach Partitions***david cornwell (09/28/04)***Would NASA impress?***James Harris (09/28/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/28/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***mmm Thecla (09/28/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***David Moran (09/28/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***W. Dale Hall (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***fishfry (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***Virgil (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***Jesse F. Hughes (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***LarryLard (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***QNils_O=2E_Sel=E5sdal=22?= (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***David C. Ullrich (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***Will Twentyman (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***David Kastrup (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***Lits O'Hate (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***Mikito Harakiri (09/29/04)***Re: Would NASA impress?***Ralph D. Ungermann (09/29/04)*

**Conway Life Deep Cell (Unit Cell Variant)***Jared Prince (09/28/04)***FINAL SOLUTIONS To MANY Astrophysical Mysteries***REM92204_at_aol.com (09/28/04)***Re: FINAL SOLUTIONS To MANY Astrophysical Mysteries***Uncle Al (09/28/04)***Re: FINAL SOLUTIONS To MANY Astrophysical Mysteries***vonroach (09/28/04)***Re: FINAL SOLUTIONS To MANY Astrophysical Mysteries***Eduardo K. Donglemeier (09/29/04)***Re: FINAL SOLUTIONS To MANY Astrophysical Mysteries***robert j. kolker (09/29/04)***Re: FINAL SOLUTIONS To MANY Astrophysical Mysteries***June R Harton (09/29/04)***Re: FINAL SOLUTIONS To MANY Astrophysical Mysteries***ZZBunker (09/29/04)*

**tell me why?***Keckman (09/28/04)***A sphere packing problem***smithdaleus (09/28/04)***Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 189)***Zach (09/28/04)***Re: When laying block, better than string for straightness***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/28/04)***Q: efficient rotation of spherical coordinates***Brian McGuinness (09/28/04)***Expected size of a set after some random insertion and removal***Soren Kuula (09/28/04)***Determining Confidence Interval***Roger Sherman (09/28/04)***hints on this limit?***Snis Pilbor (09/28/04)***Fermat/Euler theorem***duffman (09/28/04)***Proof of code unique decipherability condition***Kevin Saff (09/28/04)***Solution to prime function***Vincent Martin (09/28/04)***Re: POSTANITE DEO TIMA IMTEL COMPUTERS-a***Igor (09/28/04)***Resolution of prime function***Vincent Martin (09/28/04)***Complicated least-squares problem***Mark Mackey (09/28/04)***need with my sons homework please***Andreas (09/28/04)***Re: need with my sons homework please***Van (09/28/04)***Re: need with my sons homework please***bernard massé (09/28/04)***Re: need with my sons homework please***G.E.Ivey (09/28/04)***Re: need with my sons homework please***Geert van der Wulp (09/28/04)***Re: need with my sons homework please***Geert van der Wulp (09/28/04)***Re: need with my sons homework please***robert j. kolker (09/28/04)*

**4 d geometry***Johan (09/28/04)***Frenet frame question***Herb (09/28/04)***Probability Distribution...***Jonas Hei (09/28/04)***Proof for prime number test***David Findlay (09/28/04)***Galois theory question***Gerry Myerson (09/28/04)***prove number is divisible by 9 using modulo arithmetic***duffman (09/28/04)***Proving modulo equations***duffman (09/28/04)***multivariable calculus weakness***Tim923 (09/28/04)***Normal subgroups***Alex (09/28/04)***A differential eq of the form....***Techie (09/28/04)***Another cheap math joke!***Snis Pilbor (09/28/04)***Re: Another cheap math joke!***The Ghost In The Machine (09/28/04)***Re: Another cheap math joke!***William Elliot (09/28/04)***Re: Another cheap math joke!***Peter Webb (09/28/04)***Re: Another cheap math joke!***Jyrki Lahtonen (09/28/04)***Re: Another cheap math joke!***David Ames (09/28/04)***Re: Another cheap math joke!***Daniel Ryan (09/28/04)*

**JSH: Check this out, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/28/04)***tutor math***Eric Lin (09/28/04)***Where's the PV in Hal Puthoff's PV?***Jack Sarfatti (09/27/04)***Decomposition result, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/27/04)***Casimir Force: Irrelevant explanation for Ken Shoulders Cold Fusion EVOs***Jack Sarfatti (09/27/04)***Re: terminal velocity integral, drag proportional to v^2***Dennis May (09/27/04)***group proofs under multiplication***duffman (09/27/04)***A theoretical question about limits***Paul Smith (09/27/04)***Zero Point Energy Controversy***Jack Sarfatti (09/27/04)***Judy Garland - June 10th 1922***Dar K. (09/27/04)***Maximizing a discrete function***Anonymous (09/27/04)***Re: Maximizing a discrete function***highegg (09/27/04)***Vector Notation Question***Paul Ciszek (09/27/04)***Re: Derivation of Lorentz from basic assumptions***Eugene Shubert (09/27/04)***Re: How do you solve Int( x to 2*x +1 exp(g(u))du ) = Pi ?***Alain verghote (09/27/04)***finding the area of highest concentration***Joe (09/27/04)***finding the area of highest concentration***Joe (09/27/04)***Re: which function is greater?***highegg (09/27/04)***I'm Looking for Old TI Calculators***Tim Brauch (09/27/04)***Re: I'm Looking for Old TI Calculators***George Cox (09/27/04)***Re: I'm Looking for Old TI Calculators***Tim Brauch (09/28/04)***Re: I'm Looking for Old TI Calculators***Bhuvanesh (09/28/04)***Re: I'm Looking for Old TI Calculators***Richard Owlett (09/28/04)***Re: I'm Looking for Old TI Calculators***Brian Smith (09/28/04)*

**um....this is..***mina_world (09/27/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/27/04)***Ellipse Constant Ratio Problem***Mitch (09/27/04)***i still haven't get it***Keckman (09/27/04)***Concerns of Young Mathematicians, Summer Digest for 2004.***Lloyd Kilford (09/27/04)***spectral theory and model specification***Yves Kuhry (09/27/04)***Binary expansion of PI***Cristiano (09/27/04)***Re: solving x^ ( x^ (x +1) ) ) = y , y known."***Alain Verghote (09/27/04)***Humor in research proposal***Pradip (09/27/04)***Re: Humor in research proposal***David Kastrup (09/27/04)***Re: Humor in research proposal***William Elliot (09/27/04)***Re: Humor in research proposal***Stan Brown (09/27/04)***Re: Humor in research proposal***Ken Pledger (09/27/04)***Re: Humor in research proposal***Hauke Reddmann (09/28/04)***Re: Humor in research proposal***Narasimham G.L. (09/28/04)*

**Geometry software***Johan (09/27/04)***Math is a Language***analog57_at_yahoo.com (09/27/04)***New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 27, 2004***PhDs.org Webmaster (09/27/04)***epistomology: UTM = interpreter = simulator :: simulation = roleplay = movie***|-|erc (09/27/04)***Software for Graphing Simplicial Complexes***Michael N. Christoff (09/27/04)***Re: No Proofs in Lecture: A First Year Graduate Experience***Georg (09/27/04)***Re: No Proofs in Lecture: A First Year Graduate Experience***Chan-Ho Suh (09/27/04)***Re: No Proofs in Lecture: A First Year Graduate Experience***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/27/04)***Re: No Proofs in Lecture: A First Year Graduate Experience***Tron99 (09/27/04)***Re: No Proofs in Lecture: A First Year Graduate Experience***George Cox (09/27/04)***Re: No Proofs in Lecture: A First Year Graduate Experience***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/28/04)***Re: No Proofs in Lecture: A First Year Graduate Experience***Dan Christensen (09/28/04)*

**Octal Subtraction***Xeroliun (09/27/04)***Is an improper integral of 0/x^2 undefined if 0 is an integrand?***Adam (09/27/04)***Re: Is an improper integral of 0/x^2 undefined if 0 is an integrand?***N. Silver (09/27/04)***Re: Is an improper integral of 0/x^2 undefined if 0 is an integrand?***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/27/04)***Re: Is an improper integral of 0/x^2 undefined if 0 is an integrand?***Zdislav V. Kovarik (09/27/04)*

**Prime factorization***Wilhelm (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***Dik T. Winter (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***Someonekicked (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***Phil Carmody (09/27/04)***re:Prime factorization***Wilhelm (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***Bob Silverman (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***Wilhelm (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***Bob Silverman (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***richard miller (09/27/04)***Re: Prime factorization***Ken Starks (09/27/04)*

**Please recommend advanced math entertainment books for math major***ieee std (09/27/04)***Re: Please recommend advanced math entertainment books for math major***Pete Klimek (09/27/04)***Re: Please recommend advanced math entertainment books for math major***shedar (09/27/04)***Re: Please recommend advanced math entertainment books for math major***Tim Mellor (09/27/04)***Re: Please recommend advanced math entertainment books for math major***LarryLard (09/27/04)***Re: Please recommend advanced math entertainment books for math major***Dave Rusin (09/27/04)*

**How to integrate this function.***Adam (09/27/04)***[Fwd: problem with very slow matrix function]***Roger Bagula (09/26/04)***Question about transcendentals***Barnaby Finch (09/26/04)***Calculus change of variables with an infinite integrand***Adam (09/26/04)***Help with vector calc***D (09/26/04)***Octal Subtraction***Elysium (09/26/04)***About pii and integers***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Mark (09/26/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Michael Lockhart (09/26/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Mensanator (09/26/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Dik T. Winter (09/27/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/27/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Michael Lockhart (09/27/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/27/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Michael Lockhart (09/28/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Daniel W. Johnson (09/28/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Daniel W. Johnson (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Virgil (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Randy Poe (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Randy Poe (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Randy Poe (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Virgil (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/30/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Will Twentyman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Will Twentyman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/30/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Keckman (09/30/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Virgil (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Will Twentyman (09/29/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Dik T. Winter (09/28/04)*

**Re: About pii and integers***Virgil (09/27/04)***Re: About pii and integers***Randy Poe (09/27/04)***Re: About pii and integers***George Cox (09/27/04)*

**Ben Franklin, America's First Physicist***Jack Sarfatti (09/26/04)***Diophantine approximation question***R3769 (09/26/04)***Re: RaabeTest***David C. Ullrich (09/26/04)***Geometry problem***The Last Danish Pastry (09/26/04)***Proof of Dilworth's lemma***Emanuel_Rutten_at_planet.nl (09/26/04)***SO(3), Coordinate transformation of function on a sphere S^2-> R: f(th,ph)***Alexander Unzicker (09/26/04)***Analysis L^2 operator***osulli (09/26/04)***Analysis L^2 operator***osulli (09/26/04)***Simple matrix proof***joccis (09/26/04)***Re: Simple matrix proof***José Carlos Santos (09/26/04)***Re: Simple matrix proof***Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro (09/26/04)***Re: Simple matrix proof***Peter L. Montgomery (09/26/04)***Re: Simple matrix proof***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/27/04)***Re: Simple matrix proof***joccis (09/27/04)***Re: Simple matrix proof***joccis (09/27/04)*

**Re: Internal language of a category***Todd Trimble (09/26/04)***" solving x^ ( x^ (x +1) ) ) = y , y known."***Alain Verghote (09/26/04)***Multi dimensional geometry***Johan (09/26/04)***easy integral....***mina_world (09/26/04)***um.....this...***mina_world (09/26/04)***Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Eray Ozkural exa (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robert Low (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Ryan Reich (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Torkel Franzen (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robin Chapman (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***David C. Ullrich (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robin Chapman (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Eray Ozkural exa (09/27/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robert Low (09/27/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robin Chapman (09/28/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robin Chapman (09/28/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***David C. Ullrich (09/28/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robin Chapman (09/28/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/28/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Eray Ozkural exa (09/29/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/29/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Eray Ozkural exa (09/29/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***David C. Ullrich (09/29/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Jesse F. Hughes (09/29/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***David C. Ullrich (09/29/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Eray Ozkural exa (09/29/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Robert Low (09/29/04)*

**Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Tim Peters (09/26/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Kent Paul Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Craig Feinstein (09/27/04)***Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor***Ross A. Finlayson (09/27/04)*

**Units in algebraic integers***James Harris (09/26/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***W. Dale Hall (09/26/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Andrzej Kolowski (09/27/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Count Dracula (09/27/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/28/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Count Dracula (09/28/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/29/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/29/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/29/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/29/04)*

**Re: Units in algebraic integers***James Harris (09/27/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***David Hartley (09/27/04)***Re: Units in algebraic integers***Andrzej Kolowski (09/27/04)*

**Optimization Problem***mzhang (09/26/04)***Philosophical meaning of possibility to separate variables***John (09/26/04)***Curve of Constant integral invariant***Narasimham G.L. (09/26/04)***Mitigating the Alabama Paradox***John Savard (09/26/04)***Ostrowski's calculus book***David Ames (09/26/04)***Fake (imaginary) numbers***Charuzu ?`???[???[ (09/26/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***shedar (09/26/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***David McAnally (09/26/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***Stan Brown (09/26/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***G.E.Ivey (09/26/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***Todd Trimble (09/26/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***robert j. kolker (09/26/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***John Savard (09/27/04)***Re: Fake (imaginary) numbers***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/27/04)*

**High School Math***Charuzu ƒ`ƒƒ[ƒŠ[ (09/26/04)***conditional Probabilities help***nsgi_2004 (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***shedar (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***nsgi_2004 (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***Ted Hwa (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***shedar (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***nsgi_2004 (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***shedar (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***nsgi_2004 (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***shedar (09/26/04)*

**Re: conditional Probabilities help***Stan Brown (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***Name And Address Supplied (09/26/04)***Re: conditional Probabilities help***Leonard Blackburn (09/26/04)*

**Optimization Question***mzhang (09/26/04)***JSH: How to see it***James Harris (09/26/04)***Help on Proof: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 then a or b is even***Chris Potter (09/25/04)***Re: Help on Proof: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 then a or b is even***N. Silver (09/26/04)***Re: Help on Proof: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 then a or b is even***shedar (09/26/04)***Re: Help on Proof: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 then a or b is even***William Elliot (09/26/04)***Re: Help on Proof: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 then a or b is even***Prai Jei (09/26/04)***Re: Help on Proof: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 then a or b is even***Bill Dubuque (09/26/04)***Re: Help on Proof: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 then a or b is even***Maksim Radziwill (09/28/04)*

**Topology help!***Yifei Chen (09/25/04)***JSH: Key insight, algebra***James Harris (09/25/04)***JSH: The Math***James Harris (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: The Math***William Hale (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: The Math***David Kastrup (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: The Math***C. Bond (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: The Math***Nora Baron (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: The Math***William Hughes (09/28/04)***Re: JSH: The Math***Matt Grime (09/29/04)*

**The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***Count Dracula (09/25/04)***Two questions on finite groups***Timothy Murphy (09/25/04)***The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***James Harris (09/25/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***David Kastrup (09/25/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***James Harris (09/26/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***David Kastrup (09/26/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***James Harris (09/27/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***Andrzej Kolowski (09/28/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***Proginoskes (09/27/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***James Harris (09/28/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***Dik T. Winter (09/29/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***Arturo Magidin (09/29/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***William Hughes (09/29/04)*

**Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***Tim Smith (09/26/04)***Re: The actual math, advanced polynomial factorization***W. Dale Hall (09/26/04)*

**revolutionary ideas for extracting high order integer roots***Alexis Lemaire (09/25/04)***Fundamental Group***Khoa Tran (09/25/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/25/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***tom lewton (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Chan-Ho Suh (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Ron Sperber (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Ron Sperber (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Dave Rusin (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Lee Rudolph (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Dave Rusin (09/27/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/28/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***tom lewton (09/28/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/28/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/29/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/28/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***James Dolan (09/28/04)***Re: Fundamental Group***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/30/04)*

**Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Jon Haugsand (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Dave Seaman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Victor Eijkhout (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Dave Seaman (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Dave Seaman (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Dave Seaman (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Dave Seaman (09/26/04)*

**Re: Cantor won, but one final question anymore thnk u***Daryl McCullough (09/25/04)*

**probability theory events***nsgi_2004 (09/25/04)***Zero Point Energy and Precision Cosmology***Jack Sarfatti (09/25/04)***Comparing DC Proof with Metamath proof software***Dan Christensen (09/25/04)***Sylow Subgroups of group of order 12***Isaac (09/25/04)***Zero Point Energy and the Casimir Force***Jack Sarfatti (09/25/04)***Book on lots of phenomena and corresponding DE.***John (09/25/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/25/04)***Synthesis of Complex Variable function.***Narasimham G.L. (09/25/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Peter Webb (09/25/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Cantors proof***RL Gerl (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Daryl McCullough (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Daryl McCullough (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Daryl McCullough (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Jesse F. Hughes (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Daryl McCullough (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Denis Feldmann (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Denis Feldmann (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Virgil (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Daryl McCullough (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Daryl McCullough (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/29/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Virgil (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/29/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Virgil (09/29/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Virgil (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/27/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Brett (09/28/04)***Re: Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)*

**Re: Cantors proof***Keckman (09/28/04)*

**Std.dev. for random integers***Stig Holmquist (09/25/04)***Field of Sets***William Elliot (09/25/04)***Magazines for amateur mathematicians***asaad78 (09/25/04)***When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Dave Seaman (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Dave Seaman (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***No Way (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Michael Lockhart (09/26/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/25/04)*

**Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: When does this Cantor's (conversation) list end?***Richard (09/25/04)*

**Fermat's challenge***Luc Kumps (09/25/04)***EXACT calculation of integrals over 2D areas described by curvilinear polygons***Aristotelis E. Charalampakis (09/25/04)***Set of functions***Ivana (09/25/04)***question about induction***Steven (09/25/04)***Re: question about induction***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/25/04)***Re: question about induction***pikalaw (09/25/04)***Re: question about induction***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)***Re: question about induction***N. Silver (09/25/04)***Re: question about induction***The Last Danish Pastry (09/25/04)***Re: question about induction***Daniel W. Johnson (09/25/04)***Re: question about induction***David Bandel (09/25/04)*

**Are negated Dedekind Cuts always Real?***Ford Prefect (09/25/04)***Re: Are negated Dedekind Cuts always Real?***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)***Re: Are negated Dedekind Cuts always Real?***Daniel W. Johnson (09/25/04)***Re: Are negated Dedekind Cuts always Real?***Rainer Rosenthal (09/25/04)***Re: Are negated Dedekind Cuts always Real?***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: Are negated Dedekind Cuts always Real?***Virgil (09/25/04)*

**analysis***Steven (09/25/04)***Monotone Convergence Question***Xevious (09/25/04)***Finding radious of convergence of a series***Carlos Felippa (09/25/04)***JSH: Math people, not cool***James Harris (09/25/04)***Re: Math people, not cool***David Moran (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***Tim Brauch (09/25/04)***[JSH] Re: Math people, not cool***flip (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***Ad Hominem (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***C. Bond (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***David Kastrup (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***Andrzej Kolowski (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***Mensanator (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Math people, not cool***Lits O'Hate (09/27/04)*

**Study Q***joey (09/25/04)***topology question***Greg Ryslik (09/25/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***George Hammond (09/25/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***TMG (09/25/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***Goran Dhemmeog (09/25/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***George Hammond (09/25/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***Goran Dhemmeog (09/26/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***George Hammond (09/26/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***Goran Dhemmeog (09/27/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***George Hammond (09/28/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***Goran Dhemmeog (09/29/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***George Hammond (09/30/04)***Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***TMG (09/30/04)*

**Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation***Goran Dhemmeog (09/25/04)*

**MathType v5.2 MultiLanguage WinALL, NCSS And _Pass v2004.09.10, Mathcad v11.00b, Matlab v7 R14,***vvcd (09/25/04)***curvature estimation (term) for circular shapes***Tejas (09/25/04)***Endomorphisms of Banach spaces***Michael Barr (09/24/04)***Algebraic integer question***Brian Smith (09/24/04)***Re: Algebraic integer question***Dik T. Winter (09/25/04)***Re: Algebraic integer question***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/25/04)***Re: Algebraic integer question***Marcel Martin (09/26/04)***Re: Algebraic integer question***Arturo Magidin (09/26/04)*

**help: probability of dropping k items into N buckets***Bo Hong (09/24/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/24/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/24/04)***Re: probability of dropping k items into N buckets***Keckman (09/24/04)***x^x=y***Ramibotros (09/24/04)***Recovering a probability distribution from its moments***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/24/04)***re:Recovering a probability distribution from its moments***mathman (09/25/04)***Re: Recovering a probability distribution from its moments***Karl (09/25/04)***Re: Recovering a probability distribution from its moments***Bill Taylor (09/25/04)***Re: Recovering a probability distribution from its moments***Herman Rubin (09/25/04)*

**help with elementary math education please?***k wallace (09/24/04)***Construction of norms***Julien Santini (09/24/04)***Charite Ann Kimberly Anderson - January 22nd 1984***Dar K. (09/24/04)***My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Rick Decker (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Ryan Reich (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Arturo Magidin (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Dave Seaman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Ryan Reich (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Arturo Magidin (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Dave Seaman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Dave Seaman (09/25/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Arturo Magidin (09/25/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Arturo Magidin (09/25/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Gonçalo Rodrigues (09/24/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Randy Poe (09/26/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Will Twentyman (09/27/04)***Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)*

**Re: My real opinion about real numbers***Arturo Magidin (09/24/04)*

**Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Craig Feinstein (09/24/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Mensanator (09/24/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Robin Chapman (09/24/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Georg (09/24/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/25/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***David Bandel (09/25/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Norm Dresner (09/25/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Todd Trimble (09/26/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Todd Trimble (09/26/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***erdos fan (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Aatu Koskensilta (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Lee Rudolph (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Aatu Koskensilta (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Aatu Koskensilta (09/29/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Dave Seaman (09/29/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/29/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/29/04)*

**Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Todd Trimble (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***erdos fan (09/28/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***Todd Trimble (09/29/04)***Re: Who thinks Goldbach's Conjecture is unprovable?***david cornwell (09/30/04)*

**Are pages obselete ?***Van Jacques (09/24/04)***Re: My problem with 1.999...=2***Wes Cox (09/24/04)***Hilbert spaces among Banach spaces***Gonçalo Rodrigues (09/24/04)***Functions***Marios Koumides (09/24/04)***An infinite matrix question***Gal Binyamini (09/24/04)***Laurent series~~.***mina_world (09/24/04)***JSH: Not really a secret!***James Harris (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Not really a secret!***Justin (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Not really a secret!***Matt Grime (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Not really a secret!***James Dolan (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Not really a secret!***Tim Smith (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Not really a secret!***C. Bond (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Not really a secret!***Andrzej Kolowski (09/24/04)*

**Re: Question about God=G_uv***George Hammond (09/24/04)***point in an ellipse?***Seb (09/24/04)***Re: Chaos Prediction?***Krunom Ilicevic (09/24/04)***Stieltjes Integration***Tim Brauch (09/24/04)***2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***Malev (09/24/04)***Re: 2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***Ionizer (09/24/04)***Re: 2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***Muttley (09/24/04)***Re: 2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***Alan Erskine (09/24/04)***Re: 2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***jerry (09/25/04)***Re: 2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***jerry (09/25/04)***Re: 2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***jerry (09/25/04)***Re: 2nd American Taliban freed , last seen heading towards Colorado***tcg (09/24/04)*

**Re: Radical solution of solvable quintics***Dave Rusin (09/24/04)***Bush Went Insane on 'Snorter Goss' Cocaine***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/24/04)***LaRouche's CEC a Key Factor In Australia***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/24/04)***recommend some papers of solutions to underdetermined linear systems***roy (09/24/04)***Need to solve integral equation***Johnny78 (09/24/04)***question about linear equation systems with infinite solutions***roy (09/24/04)***Why is euclidean geometry so important?***Swami (09/24/04)***Why is euclidean geometry so important?***Swami (09/24/04)***Is there non-standart Lobachevsky plane?***stas (09/24/04)***Hello and set theory.***David J Merritt (09/24/04)***Some number theory***James Harris (09/24/04)***Re: Some number theory***C. Bond (09/24/04)***Re: Some number theory***W. Dale Hall (09/24/04)***Re: Some number theory***David Bandel (09/24/04)***Re: Some number theory***Tim Mellor (09/24/04)***Re: Some number theory***KeithK (09/25/04)*

**.9999... = 1***David Bandel (09/23/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Tim923 (09/24/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/24/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David Kastrup (09/24/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David Bandel (09/25/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/25/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David Bandel (09/25/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David Bandel (09/26/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David Bandel (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/28/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David Bandel (09/28/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Randy Poe (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***David Bandel (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Randy Poe (09/27/04)*

**Re: .9999... = 1***Michael Hochster (09/26/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Todd Trimble (09/25/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Alexander Bogomolny (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***S. Enterprize Company (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Tim923 (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Tim923 (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***The Ghost In The Machine (09/28/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/28/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***The Ghost In The Machine (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***S. Enterprize Company (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***S. Enterprize Company (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***No Way (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Dave Seaman (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Chairman of the Ozzy Osbourne Appreciation Society (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Dik T. Winter (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***Harold Schmelzer (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1, No it doesn't.***xooky (09/30/04)*

**Re: .9999... = 1***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/27/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Harold Schmelzer (09/29/04)***Re: .9999... = 1***Harold Schmelzer (09/29/04)*

**matrix solution of nonlinear polynomials***David Bandel (09/23/04)***Riemann's zeta function - trivial zeros***Wheels of Error (09/23/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/23/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/23/04)***diffusion equation***Per Dein (09/23/04)***Almost perfect odd numbers / sigma = 2n-1***mark griffith (09/23/04)***Re: Estimating the Probability of a Gaussian Vector***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/23/04)***Re: derivative of the time derivative of a function with respetoto itself***phil (09/23/04)***Odd perfect number bounds***Phil Carmody (09/23/04)***Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid view of Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/24/04)***Re: Another stupid view of Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid view of Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Will Twentyman (09/27/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/23/04)*

**Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/23/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Yuzuru Hiraga (09/24/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Yuzuru Hiraga (09/24/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Ryan Reich (09/24/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dik T. Winter (09/24/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupidcriticism of Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupidcriticism of Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dik T. Winter (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dik T. Winter (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Denis Feldmann (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dik T. Winter (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Randy Poe (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Jesse F. Hughes (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dik T. Winter (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***David McAnally (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Randy Poe (09/27/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Randy Poe (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Dik T. Winter (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***C. Bond (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/26/04)***Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof"***C. Bond (09/25/04)*

**Robyn Ellen Neufeldt - August 11th 1976***Dar K. (09/23/04)***In Conversation with Benoit Mandelbrot ( forward from John de Rivaz)***Roger Bagula (09/23/04)***Complex extension of erf***Randy Poe (09/23/04)***Re: solution of set of linear algebraic equation***G.EIvey (09/23/04)***Re: I need some help with this one, please!***Alain Verghote (09/23/04)***Combinatorics question on arrangement***Miyiki (09/23/04)***measure***Stephanie (09/23/04)***Re: measure***Georg (09/23/04)***Re: measure***David C. Ullrich (09/23/04)***Re: measure***William Elliot (09/24/04)***Re: measure***David C. Ullrich (09/24/04)***Re: measure***William Elliot (09/25/04)***Re: measure***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: measure***Julien Santini (09/25/04)***Re: measure***ArtflDodgr (09/27/04)***Re: measure***Julien Santini (09/28/04)***Re: measure***David C. Ullrich (09/29/04)***Re: measure***William Elliot (09/27/04)***Re: measure***David C. Ullrich (09/27/04)***Re: measure***William Elliot (09/28/04)*

**Re: measure***Daniel Grubb (09/23/04)***Re: measure***Amanda (09/23/04)*

**complete measure***Man (09/23/04)***Large Scale Optimization***Kangyuan Zhu (09/23/04)***Naming problem `wave number'???***Tobias Naehring (09/23/04)***2 conjectures (in C^n, or eigenvalues).***Michel PETITJEAN (09/23/04)***interpolate vector data***Thierry Schmitt (09/23/04)***Is there existing any simple method to compute the volume of hyper-sphere?***fengchao (09/23/04)***Sine wave with variable parameter***Anon Email (09/23/04)***Re: Sine wave with variable parameter***William Elliot (09/23/04)***Re: Sine wave with variable parameter***Peter Webb (09/23/04)***Re: Sine wave with variable parameter***Narasimham G.L. (09/23/04)***Re: Sine wave with variable parameter***Randy Poe (09/23/04)***Re: Sine wave with variable parameter***Randy Poe (09/23/04)***Re: Sine wave with variable parameter***PhL (09/23/04)*

**Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Israel (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***stephen_at_nomail.com (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***stephen_at_nomail.com (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***David C. Ullrich (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kent Paul Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***wehrmacht (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kevin Saff (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Phil Carmody (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kent Paul Dolan (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kristian Lahdensuo (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***wehrmacht (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***wehrmacht (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Marc Goodman (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Marc Goodman (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Tim Peters (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***stephen_at_nomail.com (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***stephen_at_nomail.com (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kent Paul Dolan (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Colin Andrew Percival (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kent Paul Dolan (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Colin Andrew Percival (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Tim Peters (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Tim Peters (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/28/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kent Paul Dolan (09/27/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Kent Paul Dolan (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/26/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***wehrmacht (09/29/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***stephen_at_nomail.com (09/25/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Phil Carmody (09/23/04)***Red Dwarf was Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Red Dwarf was Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/24/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Daniel W. Johnson (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***LarryLard (09/24/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Ralph Hartley (09/27/04)*

**Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***LarryLard (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Eray Ozkural exa (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Jean-Marc Bourguet (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Robert Low (09/23/04)***Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Owen Jacobson (09/26/04)*

**Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|***Abraham Buckingham (09/23/04)*

**sci.math FAQ and Cantors proof***Peter Webb (09/23/04)***Re: sci.math FAQ and Cantors proof***Daniel W. Johnson (09/23/04)***Re: sci.math FAQ and Cantors proof***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: sci.math FAQ and Cantors proof***Stan Brown (09/23/04)***Re: sci.math FAQ and Cantors proof***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: sci.math FAQ and Cantors proof***Scott Roper (09/23/04)***Re: sci.math FAQ and Cantors proof***Ross A. Finlayson (09/23/04)*

**Re: Systems***Margarita Madrid (09/23/04)***Need Help in an inequality Proof***Archana Patel (09/23/04)***Periodicity of a^n mod c***Doug Goncz (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/22/04)***Dawn Teresa Gabriel - September 30th 1974***Dar K. (09/22/04)***Stephanie Rose Stewart - August 28th 1987***Dar K. (09/22/04)***sum (1+1/2=1/3+..1/m)/((m+q)(m+r)) (improved)***Leroy Quet (09/22/04)***sum (1+1/2=1/3+..1/m)/((m+q)(m+r))***Leroy Quet (09/22/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/22/04)***Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Johan Kullstam (09/22/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Timothy Murphy (09/22/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***José Carlos Santos (09/23/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Suresh Venkat (09/24/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Todd Trimble (09/22/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Todd Trimble (09/27/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Johan Kullstam (09/27/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Timothy Murphy (09/27/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Lee Rudolph (09/27/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***José Carlos Santos (09/27/04)***Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Johan Kullstam (09/28/04)*

**Re: Lie groups and Lie alegbras -- some simple questions***Christopher J. Henrich (09/28/04)*

**Existence of iterated limits***Amanda (09/22/04)***Graph Theory Research Ideas***Nick (09/22/04)***Re: How Is This Possible?***Robert Vienneau (09/22/04)***Property of Compact sets?***Agapito Martinez (09/22/04)***Scope of NOT EXISTS predicate***Mikito Harakiri (09/22/04)***Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Michael Mueller (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daryl McCullough (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Jyrki Lahtonen (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Michel Hack (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Ryan Reich (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daryl McCullough (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***stephen_at_nomail.com (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Randy Poe (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Peter Webb (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Peter Webb (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***C. Bond (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Torkel Franzen (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Torkel Franzen (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daniel Grubb (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***RL Gerl (09/26/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/27/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Alex Mizrahi (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daryl McCullough (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daryl McCullough (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Ford Prefect (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daryl McCullough (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Jesse F. Hughes (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Ford Prefect (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daryl McCullough (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Ford Prefect (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daryl McCullough (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***C. Bond (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Randy Poe (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Michel Hack (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Michael Mueller (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Michael Mueller (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Abraham Buckingham (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Randy Poe (09/23/04)*

**Re: Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Will Twentyman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***fishfry (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Daniel W. Johnson (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***James Burns (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Arturo Magidin (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/22/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Jesse F. Hughes (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***John O'Flaherty (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***John O'Flaherty (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Keckman (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Dik T. Winter (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's second proof***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's "proof"***Virgil (09/23/04)*

**Re: Cantor's "proof"***Nathan (09/22/04)*

**education***Tron99 (09/22/04)***Chaos prediction?***Krunom Ilicevic (09/22/04)***Re: Positive Definite Matrices***Loke Chok Kang (09/22/04)***dependence of eigenfunction of Laplacian on domain***Tobias Naehring (09/22/04)***SMSU Problem Corner (oops!)***Les Reid (09/22/04)***Like a log***Jim Ward (09/22/04)***Re: Like a log***José Carlos Santos (09/22/04)***Re: Like a log***A N Niel (09/22/04)***Re: Like a log***François Charton (09/22/04)***Re: Like a log***François Charton (09/22/04)***Re: Like a log***A N Niel (09/22/04)***Re: Like a log***François Charton (09/22/04)***Re: Like a log***Robert Israel (09/23/04)***Re: Like a log***François Charton (09/23/04)***Re: Like a log***José Carlos Santos (09/23/04)***Re: Like a log***François Charton (09/23/04)***Re: Like a log***Robert Israel (09/23/04)***Re: Like a log***KRamsay (09/25/04)*

**Re: Like a log***Ramoj Paruchuri (09/22/04)*

**Re: Like a log***Todd Trimble (09/23/04)*

**Fractional exponent***Deep K. Deb (09/22/04)***French and German for the Mathematician***Lukas Horosiewicz (09/22/04)***I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!***M. Suhaimi Ramly (09/22/04)***Re: I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!***Rick Decker (09/22/04)***Re: I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!***William Elliot (09/22/04)***Re: I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!***Geert van der Wulp (09/22/04)***Re: I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!***ray (09/22/04)***Re: I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!***M. Suhaimi Ramly (09/23/04)*

**2 conjectures (in C^n, or eigenvalues).***Michel PETITJEAN (09/22/04)***category of commutative diagrams***noone (09/22/04)***problem about differentiation of matrix***willy (09/22/04)***Coverly Set***John M. Gamble (09/22/04)***Formula to simplify multiple summations...***Nathan Baulch (09/22/04)***sequences***Steven (09/22/04)***Sequences***Troubled (09/22/04)***limit proof w/possibly delta epsilon***nlscb (09/22/04)***Re: Graph Theory***David Eppstein (09/22/04)***Multivariable calculus book***Alistair Happencross (09/22/04)***Distributive vector law (a+b) x c = (a x c) + (b x c): how easy to prove?***Porky Pig Jr (09/22/04)***Re: Distributive vector law (a+b) x c = (a x c) + (b x c): how easy to prove?***Gerry Myerson (09/22/04)***Re: Distributive vector law (a+b) x c = (a x c) + (b x c): how easy to prove?***George Cox (09/22/04)***Re: Distributive vector law (a+b) x c = (a x c) + (b x c): how easy to prove?***Robin Chapman (09/22/04)***Re: Distributive vector law (a+b) x c = (a x c) + (b x c): how easy to prove?***Porky Pig Jr (09/23/04)*

**chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/21/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Arturo Magidin (09/21/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***George Cox (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Arturo Magidin (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Arturo Magidin (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Dan Bloomquist (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/24/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Arturo Magidin (09/24/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/24/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Arturo Magidin (09/25/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/24/04)*

**Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***George Cox (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***>uncle< >uncle< >uncle< >uncle< >uncle< Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/23/04)***Re: >uncle< >uncle< >uncle< >uncle< >uncle< Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***George Cox (09/22/04)*

**Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Will Twentyman (09/22/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***David Bandel (09/23/04)***Re: chaos <=> paradox. Prove me wrong. A challenge.***Lefty (09/24/04)*

**Recommendation needed for good text on Differential Equations.***Ashok Ramasubramanian (09/21/04)***Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***Mike Darrett (09/21/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***Willem (09/21/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***James Waldby (09/21/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***Mike Darrett (09/22/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***W. Dale Hall (09/22/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***Willem (09/22/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***LarryLard (09/22/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***Mike Darrett (09/22/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***gowan (09/22/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***dan michaels (09/22/04)***Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***Robert Israel (09/22/04)*

**Re: Travelling Salesman Problem / Shortest Path problem***Bob Silverman (09/22/04)*

**Countable plus 1 equals uncountable (?)***ray (09/21/04)***Any 'Upswing' in the Swing States?***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/21/04)***Dawn Teresa Gabriel - September 30th 1974***Dar K. (09/21/04)***Change of basis and coordinate transformations***Adam (09/21/04)***Re: Attractor set representation***Jeffrey H (09/21/04)***Laws of Chance Tables updated***Joseph Czapski (09/21/04)***Chess can easily be solved!***David Bandel (09/21/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Goran Jakupovic (09/21/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Mark ***lman (09/22/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Richard Henry (09/22/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Tim Smith (09/22/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Will Twentyman (09/22/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***David Bandel (09/22/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Dik T. Winter (09/23/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Denis Feldmann (09/23/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***David Bandel (09/23/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Dik T. Winter (09/24/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Denis Feldmann (09/24/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Will Twentyman (09/25/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***David Bandel (09/25/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***Dik T. Winter (09/26/04)***Re: Chess can easily be solved!***David Bandel (09/26/04)*

**Unitarization of Banach algebras with approximate identities***Gonçalo Rodrigues (09/21/04)***Boundary conditions for Euler Maclaurin summation formula.***John Washburn (09/21/04)***How can I define this function?***Elizabeth Berstein (09/21/04)***Inqualities for sum and integral of Sinc function***John Washburn (09/21/04)***Terminology: `opposite'?***Angus Rodgers (09/21/04)***simple extension.....;***mina_world (09/21/04)***Matrix which is Inverse of Itself***porterboy (09/21/04)***Q on groups given by generators and relations***James Pirk (09/21/04)***Re: Q on groups given by generators and relations***A N Niel (09/21/04)***Re: Q on groups given by generators and relations***Robin Chapman (09/21/04)***Re: Q on groups given by generators and relations***David Eppstein (09/21/04)***Re: Q on groups given by generators and relations***David Eppstein (09/21/04)***Re: Q on groups given by generators and relations***Todd Trimble (09/21/04)***Re: Q on groups given by generators and relations***Lee Rudolph (09/21/04)***Re: Q on groups given by generators and relations***Trav (09/22/04)*

**Re: 3D equation for***G_at_mathforum.org, L@mathforum.org, Narasimham (09/21/04)***Cross-Ratio of 4 Concurrent Lines***Narasimham G.L. (09/21/04)***Can a big enough number explain everything ?***eighth man (09/21/04)***What is this mathematically ?***eighth man (09/21/04)***Math books to master math of string theory***David (09/21/04)***derivatives of f(x,y)***ajab (09/21/04)***Help needed solving a linear system subject to constraints***Anonymous (09/21/04)***JSH: Focus on facts***James Harris (09/21/04)***Counting zeroes***Isaac (09/21/04)***A markov/probability question***Sailesh Kumar (09/21/04)***sum of divisors inequality***Sikari (09/21/04)***3D equation for "twisted plane"***Malin (09/21/04)***Integral inequality with poly.degree 3***Alex.Lupas (09/21/04)***Approximations for sin(Pi * x) , x in R ?***Alex.Lupas (09/21/04)***randomly perturbed dynamical system***ames kin (09/21/04)***Maximal subgroups and powers of primes***Warren065 (09/21/04)***string length question***NKProductionZ (09/21/04)***translation***nsgi_2004 (09/21/04)***Finite rank linear operator***Alexander Korovyev (09/21/04)***the switching powers of (-1)^x***Klaus Nomi (09/21/04)***continuum hypothesis***Alex Mizrahi (09/20/04)***explain please the phi ratio***eric wilson (09/20/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***David W. Cantrell (09/20/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Oscar Lanzi III (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Peter Webb (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Chan-Ho Suh (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Randy Poe (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***David W. Cantrell (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***G. A. Edgar (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Chan-Ho Suh (09/27/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***David W. Cantrell (09/27/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Randy Poe (09/27/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Robert Israel (09/27/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***steven (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Narasimham G.L. (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Narasimham G.L. (09/27/04)***Re: explain please the phi ratio***Narasimham G.L. (09/21/04)*

**JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***James Harris (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***C. Bond (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***Marcel Martin (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***Dik T. Winter (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***James Harris (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***LarryLard (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***W. Dale Hall (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Algebraic integers, a special case***The Ghost In The Machine (09/26/04)*

**set of all pos Z and neg Z***nsgi_2004 (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***George Cox (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***nsgi_2004 (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***nsgi_2004 (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***George Cox (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***George Cox (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***nsgi_2004 (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***George Cox (09/20/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***nsgi_2004 (09/21/04)***Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z***George Cox (09/22/04)*

**Nilpotent groups***Isaac (09/20/04)***Why Chi^2 doesnt works here?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/20/04)***Integer analogs of log, exp series***Peter Johnson (09/20/04)***Logical branch selection possible?***Ioannis (09/20/04)***Arc length and continuity***Joe Riel (09/20/04)***Goldbach Idea?***david cornwell (09/20/04)***Weights connected by springs***Tim Walters (09/20/04)***[graph theory]***Boris (09/20/04)***exact/approximate solution to ODE***Ramanan Sankaran (09/20/04)***Another look at the abc formula...***Michiel (09/20/04)***normal curvature......***mina_world (09/20/04)***Harmonic Conjugate question***Mike Lenards (09/20/04)***SMSU Problem Corner***Les Reid (09/20/04)***CumulativeInquiry BB (re DAGs/perms/dim2 posets) now functional***David Halitsky (09/20/04)***Linear system promblem***Archer (09/20/04)***Re: <<<<<Pleas help me>>>>>***Kristal (09/20/04)***Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Suresh Venkat (09/20/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Daniel Grubb (09/20/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***José Carlos Santos (09/20/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/20/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Suresh Venkat (09/21/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Lee Rudolph (09/21/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Gerry Myerson (09/22/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Suresh Venkat (09/22/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***José Carlos Santos (09/22/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/22/04)***Re: Definitions of 'simply-connected'***Suresh Venkat (09/24/04)*

**Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Bob Silverman (09/20/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Michael Lockhart (09/20/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Bob Silverman (09/20/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***ray (09/20/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Stan Brown (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Edwin Clark (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***David Bandel (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Richard Henry (09/21/04)*

**Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Michael Lockhart (09/20/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Stan Brown (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Bob Silverman (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Daniel Grubb (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Dave Rusin (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***G EddieA95 (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***George Cox (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Stan Brown (09/23/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Stan Brown (09/23/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Mensanator (09/23/04)*

**Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Edwin Clark (09/21/04)*

**Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Tim923 (09/20/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***David Bandel (09/20/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Bob Silverman (09/21/04)***Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?***Bob Silverman (09/24/04)*

**Re: Help me solving: (f(x)+3*x )^[5/3]=f(x /(x+1))+3*x /(x+1) .***Alain Verghote (09/20/04)***Close encounters of the dream type ?***eighth man (09/20/04)***Intuition about some well-known curves***The Last Danish Pastry (09/20/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***Phil Carmody (09/20/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***Narasimham G.L. (09/20/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/20/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***The Last Danish Pastry (09/20/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/22/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***The Last Danish Pastry (09/22/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***Stephen M. Fortescue (09/23/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***The Last Danish Pastry (09/23/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***The Last Danish Pastry (09/23/04)***Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***Narasimham G.L. (09/23/04)*

**Re: Intuition about some well-known curves***Tim Mellor (09/20/04)*

**Re: Elementary topology question***K. P. Hart (09/20/04)***pointers on applications of graph theory and combinatorics***manikraina_at_gmail.com (09/20/04)***New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 20, 2004***PhDs.org Webmaster (09/20/04)***Dimensional Analysis & Casimir Force***Jack Sarfatti (09/20/04)***uniqueness of limits at infinity***Jani Yusef (09/20/04)***Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity***Peter Webb (09/20/04)***Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity***Will (09/20/04)***Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity***William Elliot (09/20/04)***Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity***David C. Ullrich (09/20/04)***Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity***GEIvey (09/20/04)***Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity***Bob Silverman (09/20/04)***Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/20/04)*

**Connectedness***G.Sun (09/20/04)***What's wrong with Milonni's Casimir Force Models?***Jack Sarfatti (09/20/04)***JSH: Nora Baron***James Harris (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Justin (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Wayne Brown (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***N. Silver (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Jesse F. Hughes (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Wayne Brown (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***David B. Redmond (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Wayne Brown (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Dik T. Winter (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Richard Henry (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***David C. Ullrich (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***N. Silver (09/23/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Dik T. Winter (09/23/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***John M. Gamble (09/23/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***C. Bond (09/23/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***James Harris (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***C. Bond (09/24/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***James Harris (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***C. Bond (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***David Kastrup (09/25/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Dik T. Winter (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Jim Burns (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***KRamsay (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Mensanator (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Jim Burns (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Mensanator (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Jim Burns (09/26/04)***Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Dik T. Winter (09/27/04)*

**Re: JSH: Nora Baron***Will Twentyman (09/21/04)***Re: Nora Baron***flip (09/20/04)*

**Analysis of extrema without coordinates***Igor Khavkine (09/20/04)***Homtopy really stupid question***Isaac (09/20/04)***bounding an infinate bounded convex set by polyhedra***Alex Tetenov (09/20/04)***Creative thinking query***YC (09/20/04)***Chaos/Fractals: Call for Papers***Cliff (09/20/04)***IT'S EASY!!***Will Heierman (09/20/04)***Summation of Powers of 6?***Buzzini (09/20/04)***Eisenstein polynomials***Peter L. Montgomery (09/20/04)***zeta values***Dirk Osterkamp (09/20/04)***number theory***shay (09/19/04)***A "better" antiderivative of x^p?***David W. Cantrell (09/19/04)***8-puzzle states***Amittai Aviram (09/19/04)***Another Boolean Simplification Problem, Thanks in Advance***wang (09/19/04)***Is there a known algorithm for this?***Gerald Rosenberg (09/19/04)***Special form numbers factorization***Sandra (09/19/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***flip (09/19/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***flip (09/19/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***flip (09/19/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***anonymous (09/19/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***Phil Carmody (09/20/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***Bob Silverman (09/20/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***Bob Silverman (09/20/04)***Re: Special form numbers factorization***Paul Leyland (09/21/04)*

**Shalynn Maurai Snidanko - June 25th 1979***Dar K. (09/19/04)***Carrie Lynn Ruep - November 27th 1973***Dar K. (09/19/04)***Question on directed cosines and tetrahedron***Count Dracula (09/19/04)***Question on directed cosines and tetrahedron***fellow (09/19/04)***Summation of Odd Powers of 2?***Buzzini (09/19/04)***Kleene closure of language and topology***Mark Hansen (09/19/04)***linear algebra***Someonekicked (09/19/04)***Fibonacci numbers: F(n)^3 + F(n+1)^3 - F(n-1)^3 = F(3n).***Dae-jung Yoo (09/19/04)***Re: Fibonacci numbers: F(n)^3 + F(n+1)^3 - F(n-1)^3 = F(3n).***A N Niel (09/19/04)***Re: Fibonacci numbers: F(n)^3 + F(n+1)^3 - F(n-1)^3 = F(3n).***Robin Chapman (09/19/04)***Re: Fibonacci numbers: F(n)^3 + F(n+1)^3 - F(n-1)^3 = F(3n).***Klueless (09/19/04)***Re: Fibonacci numbers: F(n)^3 + F(n+1)^3 - F(n-1)^3 = F(3n).***Roger L. Bagula (09/20/04)*

**Math proofs, beyond functional definition***James Harris (09/19/04)***If you need an undergraduate to help in research***M. Mustafa (09/19/04)***sum (n^2)/[2^(n+1)]***mina_world (09/19/04)***Series of Rouche and Kossler***Scott Guthery (09/19/04)***chain rule...***mina_world (09/19/04)***Question about Trivial Zeros of the Riemann Zeta Function***Jim King (09/19/04)***Number Patterns***Zul (09/19/04)***JSH: Just plain silly***James Harris (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***David C. Ullrich (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Jesse F. Hughes (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Mensanator (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***C. Bond (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Jesse F. Hughes (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Denis Feldmann (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***W. Dale Hall (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Dik T. Winter (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***W. Dale Hall (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***James Harris (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Jesse F. Hughes (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***David C. Ullrich (09/21/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Wayne Brown (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Mensanator (09/20/04)***Re: JSH: Just plain silly***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/20/04)*

**Re: JSH: Just plain silly***David Bandel (09/20/04)*

**Synopsis, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/19/04)***Relations***Anonymous (09/19/04)***Maths ebooks sites and file sharing programs***John R Ramsden (09/19/04)***What are functions f(x)*f(1/x)=1 ?***Narasimham G.L. (09/19/04)***problems with the bell curve!***David Bandel (09/19/04)***Re: problems with the bell curve!***David C. Ullrich (09/19/04)***Re: problems with the bell curve!***David Kastrup (09/19/04)***Re: problems with the bell curve!***Daniel Ryan (09/19/04)***Re: problems with the bell curve!***Narasimham G.L. (09/19/04)***Re: problems with the bell curve!***Bob Silverman (09/20/04)*

**book on calculus and probability..***mxlr_at_beep.ohm (09/19/04)***Bound on pi(n)***Saint Cad (09/19/04)***Ian Peterson refutes Hal Puthoff's Zero Point Energy Claims?***Jack Sarfatti (09/19/04)***Bessel Function - J0(x)***D. Baruth (09/19/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***C. Bond (09/19/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***D. Baruth (09/20/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***Axel Vogt (09/20/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***C. Bond (09/20/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***D. Baruth (09/21/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***C. Bond (09/21/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***D. Baruth (09/21/04)***Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (09/24/04)*

**Re: Bessel Function - J0(x)***r5 (09/24/04)*

**Mathlete = ProPoet***Pro Poet (09/19/04)***Solving a system of linear inequalities.***Sergio (09/18/04)***conformal equivalence***si (09/18/04)***Cross-ratio induced from another pencil of rays***Narasimham G.L. (09/18/04)***A Simple Boolean Expression Problem***wang (09/18/04)***Regina Nicole Ravine - July 22nd 1983***Dar K. (09/18/04)***Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Dar K. (09/18/04)***Daryl Kabatoff - October 1st, 2004 Re: Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo (09/19/04)***Re: Daryl Kabatoff - October 1st, 2004 Re: Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Dar K. (09/19/04)***Re: Daryl Kabatoff - October 1st, 2004 Re: Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo (09/19/04)***Re: Daryl Kabatoff - October 1st, 2004 Re: Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Stan de SD (09/20/04)***Re: Daryl Kabatoff - October 1st, 2004 Re: Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Yankee Rebel (09/21/04)***Re: Daryl Kabatoff - October 1st, 2004 Re: Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo (09/22/04)***Re: Daryl Kabatoff - October 1st, 2004 Re: Sandra Louise Kari - April 28th 1984***Stan de SD (09/20/04)*

**Divinity Manifest - The Golden Ratio***CK (09/18/04)***JSH: Analogy, xy=2, evens***James Harris (09/18/04)***Re: JSH: Analogy, xy=2, evens***George Cox (09/18/04)***Re: Analogy, xy=2, evens***Michael Lockhart (09/18/04)***Re: JSH: Analogy, xy=2, evens***Paul Murray (09/18/04)***Re: JSH: Analogy, xy=2, evens***C. Bond (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Analogy, xy=2, evens***Mike Headon (09/19/04)***Re: JSH: Analogy, xy=2, evens***The Ghost In The Machine (09/26/04)*

**Re: Congratulation,From Platinum Lottery.***Prai Jei (09/18/04)***7 primes in intervals [k*30,(k+1)*30]***Hugo Pfoertner (09/18/04)***distance between sets***James Holgersen (09/18/04)***cross-derivatives***Ekaterina (09/18/04)***Casimir Force is NOT a Virtual Photon ZPF Force***Jack Sarfatti (09/18/04)***is this a set?***nsgi_2004 (09/18/04)***Re: is this a set?***Dennis May (09/18/04)***Re: is this a set?***George Cox (09/18/04)***integers are ordered?***mathman (09/18/04)***Re: is this a set?***Arturo Magidin (09/18/04)***Re: is this a set?***nsgi_2004 (09/20/04)***Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/20/04)***Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/20/04)***Re: is this a set?***nsgi_2004 (09/20/04)***Re: is this a set?***Peter Fairbrother (09/21/04)***Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/21/04)***Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/21/04)***Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/21/04)***Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/21/04)***Re: is this a set?***nsgi_2004 (09/21/04)***Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/21/04)*

**Re: is this a set?***Mikito Harakiri (09/21/04)*

**Re: is this a set?***shedar (09/19/04)***Re: is this a set?***David C. Ullrich (09/19/04)***Re: is this a set?***joccis (09/19/04)***Re: is this a set?***KRamsay (09/20/04)*

**strange properties of (-1)^x***Klaus Nomi (09/18/04)***symmetric matrix of the type Mij = Ai*Aj***Andreas Leineweber (09/18/04)***Cylindrical Helix question, curvature***Isaac (09/18/04)***Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***simon plouffe (09/18/04)***Re: Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***Rouben Rostamian (09/18/04)***Re: Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***Denis Feldmann (09/18/04)***Re: Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***Kent Paul Dolan (09/18/04)***Re: Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***Bhuvanesh (09/19/04)***Re: Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***Rouben Rostamian (09/19/04)***Re: Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***Alec Mihailovs (09/19/04)***Re: Plouffe's inverter : New program, version of sept. 18 2004***Rouben Rostamian (09/19/04)*

**Re: Geometric series quest.***David W. Cantrell (09/18/04)***A way for P!=NP***Denis (09/18/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Daniel McLaury (09/18/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Barb Knox (09/19/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Daniel McLaury (09/19/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Denis Flex (09/20/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Craig Feinstein (09/21/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Mike Oliver (09/21/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Craig Feinstein (09/21/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Barb Knox (09/21/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Tim Mellor (09/22/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Leonard Blackburn (09/22/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Leonard Blackburn (09/22/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Acid Pooh (09/22/04)*

**Re: A way for P!=NP***Michael Mueller (09/22/04)***Re: A way for P!=NP***Denis Flex (09/23/04)*

**Milonni's biggest blunder?***Jack Sarfatti (09/18/04)***Infinte strings of digits***Peter Webb (09/18/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***William Elliot (09/18/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***David C. Ullrich (09/18/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***N. Silver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***Barb Knox (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***N. Silver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***Barb Knox (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***N. Silver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***N. Silver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***Mike Oliver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***N. Silver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***Jim Burns (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***N. Silver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***John M. Gamble (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***Mike Oliver (09/19/04)***Re: Infinte strings of digits***N. Silver (09/19/04)*

**Re: Infinte strings of digits***Mike Oliver (09/19/04)*

**Geometry Posers***Vikram (09/18/04)***ODE: Boundedness of solutions***Thomas Nordhaus (09/18/04)***Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***George (09/18/04)***Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***Richard Henry (09/18/04)***Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***Clinton C Zimmerman (09/19/04)***Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***No Way (09/19/04)***Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***Clinton C Zimmerman (09/19/04)***Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***No Way (09/19/04)***Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***Richard Henry (09/20/04)***Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***Clinton C Zimmerman (09/20/04)*

**Re: Oh no! Monty Hall problem again.....***Clinton C Zimmerman (09/19/04)*

**Size of finite fields***William Elliot (09/18/04)***transcendental numbers***Troubled (09/18/04)***Question about a Proof in Set Theory...***joshua lee (09/18/04)***Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***William Elliot (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/22/04)*

**Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Torkel Franzen (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Torkel Franzen (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Torkel Franzen (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Torkel Franzen (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Denis Feldmann (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Denis Feldmann (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/24/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***fishfry (09/24/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/26/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/26/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/22/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Neil W Rickert (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Neil W Rickert (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/26/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/27/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Martin Schlansky (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/22/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/24/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***KRamsay (09/26/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/28/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/29/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***KRamsay (09/29/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Nath Rao (09/30/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/26/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/29/04)*

**Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Rupert (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Denis Feldmann (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Denis Feldmann (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Denis Feldmann (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Gustaf Rydevik (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Daryl McCullough (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Daryl McCullough (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Tim Mellor (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Daryl McCullough (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/22/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Keith Ramsay (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/25/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Rupert (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Rupert (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Rupert (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Rupert (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Rupert (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Neil W Rickert (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Bill Taylor (09/22/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/22/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/23/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/26/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Herman Jurjus (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Herman Jurjus (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***J.E. (09/23/04)*

**Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/19/04)*

**Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/18/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/19/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/20/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***KRamsay (09/21/04)***Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?***Jonathan Hoyle (09/21/04)*

**analytic => strictly harmnoic functions***osulli (09/18/04)***Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/17/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***C. Bond (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Tim Smith (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Virgil (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Daniel Ryan (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***W. Dale Hall (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***C. Bond (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***W. Dale Hall (09/19/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/19/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***W. Dale Hall (09/19/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/19/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Nora Baron (09/19/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Daniel Ryan (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Peter Pan (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/21/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Count Dracula (09/21/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/21/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Randy Poe (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Peter Pan (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Robin Chapman (09/21/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Nora Baron (09/23/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/23/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Nora Baron (09/23/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Bill Dubuque (09/25/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/23/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Bill Dubuque (09/23/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***C. Bond (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***LarryLard (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Rick Decker (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/25/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Lits O'Hate (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Rick Decker (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Jesse F. Hughes (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Dik T. Winter (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Phil Carmody (09/24/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Count Dracula (09/25/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/25/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***David Kastrup (09/26/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/26/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***KRamsay (09/27/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***David C. Ullrich (09/27/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Angus Rodgers (09/27/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Oppie (09/26/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/27/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***gowan (09/27/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/28/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***W. Dale Hall (09/29/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/29/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***W. Dale Hall (09/29/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/29/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***W. Dale Hall (09/29/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***C. Bond (09/29/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Wayne Brown (09/29/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Nora Baron (09/19/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***LarryLard (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***David C. Ullrich (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Randy Poe (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***James Harris (09/20/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Mensanator (09/21/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/24/04)*

**Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Arturo Magidin (09/18/04)*

**Re: Some math, algebraic integers***Nora Baron (09/18/04)***Re: Some math, algebraic integers***David Bandel (09/23/04)*

**Re: PLEASE SAVE US***flip (09/17/04)***Puthoff's EVO Explanation***Jack Sarfatti (09/17/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements whenwe have sets???***mathman (09/17/04)***Euclid IX.15***Bobby (09/17/04)***Is this proof flawed?***Mark Griffith (09/17/04)***Twin primes distribution***Jack D. Ripper (09/17/04)***number of factors given prime factorization***Tim923 (09/17/04)***Re: Polytrope approx. near x=0***Paul Hellings (09/17/04)***Mohini Venkataramanan - August 28th 1958***Dar K. (09/17/04)***Witold Jordan - January 7th 1962***Dar K. (09/17/04)***Witold Jordan - January 7th 1962***Dar K. (09/17/04)***Correction on virtual photon force***Jack Sarfatti (09/17/04)***pen and pencil exponentation***David Bandel (09/17/04)***Moebius Band appears degenerate Torus, not disoriented***Narasimham G.L. (09/17/04)***Re: Preprint archives considered harmful***Ross A. Finlayson (09/17/04)***non-conformal mapping***g kamath (09/17/04)***Math projects for 8-9 year old***Richard Owlett (09/17/04)***Hal Puthoff's explanation of Casimir force as a virtual photon force is wrong***Jack Sarfatti (09/17/04)***Spherical boundary ZPF force is repulsive***Jack Sarfatti (09/17/04)***closed forms are exact--Poincare ?***Van Jacques (09/17/04)***Complex, singularities, exponentials, roots.***Carlos (09/17/04)***Re: Complex, singularities, exponentials, roots.***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: Complex, singularities, exponentials, roots.***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: Complex, singularities, exponentials, roots.***The World Wide Wade (09/17/04)***Re: Complex, singularities, exponentials, roots.***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/19/04)***Re: Complex, singularities, exponentials, roots.***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/26/04)*

**Common sense, major discoveries***James Harris (09/17/04)***Re: Common sense, major discoveries***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: Common sense, major discoveries***David Kastrup (09/17/04)***Re: Common sense, major discoveries***fishfry (09/17/04)***Re: Common sense, major discoveries***Gib Bogle (09/17/04)***Re: Common sense, major discoveries***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/17/04)*

**Re: Sarfatti looks like my Herb Hook-up***Lord Valve (09/17/04)***SAW BENOIT MANDELBROT ON CNBC TODAY***robert (09/17/04)***Problem in connectedness of subspace***G.Sun (09/17/04)***Lie groups and algebra question***Trav (09/17/04)***Re: Tricky Factorial Problem***Brian VanPelt (09/17/04)***A set theory question***TCL (09/17/04)***Re: A set theory question***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: A set theory question***TCL (09/17/04)***Re: A set theory question***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: A set theory question***TCL (09/17/04)***Re: A set theory question***Dennis May (09/17/04)***Re: A set theory question***Michael Barr (09/18/04)***Re: A set theory question***KRamsay (09/19/04)***Re: A set theory question***David C. Ullrich (09/19/04)***Re: A set theory question***Dave Seaman (09/19/04)***Re: A set theory question***David C. Ullrich (09/19/04)***Re: A set theory question***Dave Seaman (09/19/04)*

**Re: A set theory question***G.E.Ivey (09/17/04)*

**Integral{x^(2/3)*e^(-ax) dx}?***Anonymous (09/17/04)***Question on varieties in C^n***si (09/17/04)***Zero Point Energy, Gravity, Casimir Force***Jack Sarfatti (09/17/04)***Television Screen dimensions***John0714 (09/17/04)***Re: Television Screen dimensions***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/17/04)***Re: Television Screen dimensions***The Last Danish Pastry (09/17/04)*

**Goldbach Conjecture Book***david cornwell (09/17/04)***European cobbled streets pattern***Fernando Gonzalez del Cueto (09/16/04)***Series solutions of differential equations***Philip McSweeney (09/16/04)***Series solutions of differential equations***Philip McSweeney (09/16/04)***My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/16/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/16/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***C. Bond (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***fuffy (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Jim (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Randy Poe (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Bill Dubuque (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***W. Dale Hall (09/18/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/18/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***W. Dale Hall (09/19/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***W. Dale Hall (09/20/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Rupert (09/18/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/18/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Arturo Magidin (09/18/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/19/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/19/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/20/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/22/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/22/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/23/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***C. Bond (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***anon (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Rupert (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***LarryLard (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***W. Dale Hall (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Jesse F. Hughes (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***W. Dale Hall (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/24/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Rupert (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***C. Bond (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Oppie (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/28/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/28/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/28/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Michael Lockhart (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Jesse F. Hughes (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***C. Bond (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Nora Baron (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Rupert (09/29/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***David Kastrup (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Daniel Ryan (09/26/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Peter Pan (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***James Harris (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Jesse F. Hughes (09/25/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Keith A. Lewis (09/27/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Jesse F. Hughes (09/28/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/28/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Peter Pan (09/26/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/26/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Rupert (09/19/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Bill Dubuque (09/18/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Andrzej Kolowski (09/18/04)*

**Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Daniel Ryan (09/17/04)*

**Re: My paper, and the cheaters***David Kastrup (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Jesse F. Hughes (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Lits O'Hate (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Rick Decker (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/17/04)***Re: My paper, and the cheaters***Will Twentyman (09/18/04)*

**Question about closed and compact sets***Agapito Martinez (09/16/04)***STRANGE PROPERTY OF THE GOLDEN RATIO***Will Heierman (09/16/04)***Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***JAL (09/16/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Dave Seaman (09/16/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Dan Christensen (09/17/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Dan Christensen (09/17/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Jesse F. Hughes (09/17/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have s...***KRamsay (09/17/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***G. A. Edgar (09/17/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Georg (09/17/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Anthony Cerrato (09/18/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Torkel Franzen (09/18/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Anthony Cerrato (09/19/04)*

**Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Herman Rubin (09/18/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/19/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***JAL (09/20/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Dave Seaman (09/20/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Georg (09/20/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Jesse F. Hughes (09/20/04)***Re: Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/20/04)*

**James Edward Gordon - August 9th 1913***Dar K. (09/16/04)***Mohini Venkataramanan - August 28th 1958***Dar K. (09/16/04)***Probabilty Question***Farmer (09/16/04)***Square root of non-symmetric positive definite***Mimosa (09/16/04)***derivative...***mina_world (09/16/04)***Lines in R^2***alliville (09/16/04)***analytic...'***mina_world (09/16/04)***Re: Why are there more Mersenne primes than Fermat primes???***Bob Silverman (09/16/04)***Zero Point Energy, Gravity and Cold Fusion***Jack Sarfatti (09/16/04)***Re: I wanna be a big mathematician!***Bob Silverman (09/16/04)***(no subject)***G.EIvey (09/16/04)***Inverse of space?***papu (09/16/04)***Re: rule of signs***G.EIvey (09/16/04)***Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***detourre (09/16/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***Gerry Myerson (09/17/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***Ronald Bruck (09/17/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/17/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/17/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***Nick Singer (09/17/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***M.J.T. Guy (09/17/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***David C. Ullrich (09/18/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***M.J.T. Guy (09/22/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***David C. Ullrich (09/23/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***David C. Ullrich (09/23/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***Gerry Myerson (09/23/04)***Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***David C. Ullrich (09/24/04)*

**Re: Is the infinite series \sum (-1)^E(2*sin(n))/n convergent ?***Nick Singer (09/20/04)*

**Re: Euclidean geometry problem***l_mcdermott_at_alliedbakeries.co.uk (09/16/04)***"Time delation". A real concept or a mistake of physics?***ThanhMinh Nguyen (09/16/04)***beach tent and logarithm***Jorden Nabbe (09/16/04)***Best Softwares & Cracks HERE =>>> Download NOW***assalin (09/16/04)***Math Brain Teaser Number Game***FreewareTown.com (09/16/04)***Academy123.com - Solutions to Algebra Textbook Problems***Anthropocentric (09/16/04)***Analysis question***alliville (09/16/04)***HOW DO YOU THINK ABOUT REFORM FIZEAU EXPERIMENT?***THANHMINH NGUYEN (09/16/04)***theory of geometric algebras***David Bandel (09/16/04)***Help with Limit problem***Will (09/16/04)***ZPE & Dimension***Jack Sarfatti (09/16/04)***metric units***anka (09/16/04)***Final Step of the Prine Number Theorem, I can not understand***erdos fan (09/16/04)***Kronecker symbol (a/b), periodic in b for fixed a?***Harry J. Smith (09/16/04)***Important, best mathematics universities***Bobby (09/16/04)***Relation between skolem functions and axiom of choice***Agamemnon (09/15/04)***Re: Relation between skolem functions and axiom of choice***Aatu Koskensilta (09/16/04)***Re: Relation between skolem functions and axiom of choice***William Elliot (09/16/04)***Re: Relation between skolem functions and axiom of choice***Torkel Franzen (09/16/04)***Re: Relation between skolem functions and axiom of choice***Jeffrey Ketland (09/17/04)*

**Simple math question. Help!***DW (09/15/04)***i figure you people are smart enough to read the details and see this is for real***free stuff guy (09/15/04)***Loserville***James Harris (09/15/04)***Re: Loserville***Christian Bau (09/15/04)***Re: Loserville***James Burns (09/15/04)***Re: Loserville***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/15/04)***Re: Loserville***Justin (09/16/04)***Re: Loserville***David Bandel (09/16/04)***Re: Loserville***fishfry (09/16/04)***Re: Loserville***Will Twentyman (09/16/04)***Re: Loserville***C. Bond (09/16/04)***Re: Loserville***Oppie (09/16/04)*

**Help with Knapsack LIKE problem***Stush (09/15/04)***Mohini Venkataramanan - August 28th 1958***Dar K. (09/15/04)***Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Mimosa (09/15/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Ron Sperber (09/15/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Mimosa (09/15/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Timothy Murphy (09/15/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Mimosa (09/17/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Jim Heckman (09/18/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Timothy Murphy (09/18/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Mimosa (09/20/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Lee Rudolph (09/16/04)***Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)*

**Re: Why PSL(2,R) not isomorphic to PGL(2,R)?***Rupert (09/16/04)*

**infinite secrets***Dan Bloomquist (09/15/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Sam Wormley (09/15/04)***Re: infinite secrets***robert j. kolker (09/15/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Dan Bloomquist (09/16/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Helmut Wabnig (09/16/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Double-A (09/16/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Mark Fergerson (09/17/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Maleki (09/17/04)***Re: infinite secrets***David (09/19/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Helmut Wabnig (09/17/04)***Re: infinite secrets***mmeron_at_cars3.uchicago.edu (09/17/04)***Re: infinite secrets***robert j. kolker (09/17/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Mensanator (09/17/04)*

**Re: infinite secrets***robert j. kolker (09/15/04)***Re: infinite secrets***Maleki (09/18/04)*

**Math expression standard***Kenneth Lance (09/15/04)***Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities***Uncle Al (09/15/04)***Re: Unknown Functions & Einstein's Incompetence***Uncle Al (09/15/04)***re:Math Equation needs to be resolved ??***army2002 (09/15/04)***Why doesn't e^ix = 1 for all x?***Lee Reeves (09/15/04)***simple extension..***mina_world (09/15/04)***Eigenvalue problem***Yue Wu (09/15/04)***Re: Integer products***Tereasa Thomas (09/15/04)***measure theory***Stephanie (09/15/04)***Factorization and Discreet Logarithms***tp (09/15/04)***Elastica intrinsic coodrinates***Narasimham G.L. (09/15/04)***Finite presentations***Isaac (09/15/04)***unique number from 1-1000***turay (09/15/04)***Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***PRL (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jon Haugsand (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***No Way (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***PRL (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***No Way (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Kevin Saff (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jonathan Hoyle (09/15/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Michael Jørgensen (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Gus Gassmann (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Ray Mercham (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Ray Mercham (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Ray Mercham (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Art (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Ray Mercham (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Ray Mercham (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Doug Evans (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Torkel Franzen (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Ray Mercham (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Doug Evans (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Lee Rudolph (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Lee Rudolph (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jesse F. Hughes (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jim Burns (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Matt Grime (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Daniel Grubb (09/16/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Michael Hochster (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Fial Saunders (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Torkel Franzen (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Fial Saunders (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Torkel Franzen (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Fial Saunders (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Robin Chapman (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David W. Cantrell (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jon Haugsand (09/16/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Will Twentyman (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Sylvain Croussette (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David W. Cantrell (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***The World Wide Wade (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David W. Cantrell (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Brian Chandler (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David W. Cantrell (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Brian Chandler (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Leonard Blackburn (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David W. Cantrell (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Leonard Blackburn (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***The World Wide Wade (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Leonard Blackburn (09/18/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Simon G Best (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Christopher (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Eray Ozkural exa (09/15/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Doug Evans (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***John Everet (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Tapio (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Tapio (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Dave Seaman (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Harold Schmelzer (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Matthew Jackson (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***PRL (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Michael Lockhart (09/16/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***PRL (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Robin Chapman (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***PRL (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jesse F. Hughes (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jesse F. Hughes (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jesse F. Hughes (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David W. Cantrell (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Denis Feldmann (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David C. Ullrich (09/25/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***briggs_at_encompasserve.org (09/24/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David W. Cantrell (09/26/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Jesse F. Hughes (09/24/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***D (09/17/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David Bandel (09/18/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***anon (09/19/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Gaucher Philippe (09/20/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***The World Wide Wade (09/20/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Mike VM (09/20/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/20/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Tim Mellor (09/20/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/21/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Tim Mellor (09/21/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/21/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David Bandel (09/21/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/21/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David Bandel (09/21/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Doug Evans (09/22/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David Bandel (09/23/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Al Redding (09/23/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Muttley (09/23/04)***Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***David Bandel (09/24/04)*

**Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1***Matt (09/28/04)*

**Solitary numbers / Friendly numbers (help needed)***Geert van der Wulp (09/15/04)***Re: Solitary numbers / Friendly numbers (help needed)***Michael Jørgensen (09/15/04)***Re: Solitary numbers / Friendly numbers (help needed)***David Einstein (09/15/04)***Re: Solitary numbers / Friendly numbers (help needed)***Keith A. Lewis (09/17/04)***Re: Solitary numbers / Friendly numbers (help needed)***David M Einstein (09/17/04)*

**Reals form a saddle shape? Re: Adics are Riemannian Geometry and Reals are Lobachevsky and Doubly-Infinites are Euclidean***Archimedes Plutonium (09/15/04)***evidence Re: Reals form a saddle shape? Re: Adics are Riemannian Geometry and Reals are Lobachevsky and Doubly-Infinites are Euclidean***Archimedes Plutonium (09/16/04)***Re: evidence Re: Reals form a saddle shape? Re: Adics are Riemannian Geometry and Reals are Lobachevsky and Doubly-Infinites are Euclidean***Tim Mellor (09/18/04)***Re: evidence Re: Reals form a saddle shape? Re: Adics are Riemannian Geometry and Reals are Lobachevsky and Doubly-Infinites are Euclidean***Archimedes Plutonium (09/18/04)***Re: evidence Re: Reals form a saddle shape? Re: Adics are Riemannian Geometry and Reals are Lobachevsky and Doubly-Infinites are Euclidean***Archimedes Plutonium (09/22/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/22/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/29/04)*

**Bayes problem - error?***Kate Yoak (09/15/04)***Measure Theory Inquiry***averagejoe221_at_hotmail.com (09/15/04)***(SR) Lorentz t', x' = Intervals***Eleaticus (09/15/04)***Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws***Eleaticus (09/15/04)***Interpolation optimization***Cyrus Lan (09/15/04)***binary vector packings***Andrew Scott (09/15/04)***Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Ted Hwa (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***William Elliot (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***William Elliot (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Trav (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Arturo Magidin (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Arturo Magidin (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Arturo Magidin (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/15/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Ted Hwa (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Ted Hwa (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***William Elliot (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***William Elliot (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***William Elliot (09/17/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Arturo Magidin (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Arturo Magidin (09/16/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Isaac (09/19/04)***Re: Very confused on normal closure please assist***Arturo Magidin (09/19/04)*

**Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***David Wagner (09/15/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***XGR131 (09/15/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***Gerry Myerson (09/15/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***XGR131 (09/15/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***David Wagner (09/15/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***Gerry Myerson (09/17/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***Keith A. Lewis (09/17/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***David Wagner (09/20/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***David Wagner (09/20/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***Keith A. Lewis (09/21/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***Robert Israel (09/21/04)***Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***David Wagner (09/26/04)*

**Re: Sum of k-th powers, algorithmically***David Wagner (09/21/04)*

**Call for Papers***journal (09/14/04)***Cauchy's theorem question plz help***Isaac (09/14/04)***Re: Avogadro number FALLACY***hanson (09/14/04)***Scott Kim's Snake Problem***M. Suhaimi Ramly (09/14/04)***H_inf norm and Hankel singular values***Vahid (09/14/04)***Re: the reported decline in wages***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/14/04)***The Star-Spangled Conjecture***Chris Piantes (09/14/04)***Re: The Star-Spangled Conjecture***John T Lowry (09/14/04)***Re: The Star-Spangled Conjecture***Gerry Myerson (09/14/04)***Re: The Star-Spangled Conjecture***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/15/04)***Re: The Star-Spangled Conjecture***James Waldby (09/15/04)***Re: The Star-Spangled Conjecture***Robin Chapman (09/15/04)***Re: The Star-Spangled Conjecture***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/15/04)*

**Independent Analytical Confirmation of Relativity***Bill Clark (09/14/04)***Infinite Set***Marios Koumides (09/14/04)***Erin Nicole Caudle - December 6th 1980***Dar K. (09/14/04)***Importance of Daniell integration in introductory courses***Lukas Horosiewicz (09/14/04)***Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***ray (09/14/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***shedar (09/14/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***Dave Seaman (09/14/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***shedar (09/15/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***Dave Seaman (09/15/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***ray (09/16/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***Frank J. Lhota (09/16/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***Frank J. Lhota (09/17/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***Dave Seaman (09/16/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***shedar (09/15/04)*

**Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***Bill Taylor (09/15/04)***Re: Epistemological problem relating to infinite sets.***ray (09/21/04)*

**Finding the expectation of |XY - WZ|***beihai (09/14/04)***Polynomial expansion problem***Laserman (09/14/04)***New list-server (and BB) for discussion re DAGs, posets, and permutations***David Halitsky (09/14/04)***noise and differential equation***ames_kin (09/14/04)***matrix manipulation***John (09/14/04)***classification of Lie groups***Mark Adams (09/14/04)***Frustrating step in a proof -- basic abstract algebra***Chu (09/14/04)***Ellipse handling.***Sreekanth (09/14/04)***Flexes, conics and curves***Jose Capco (09/14/04)***Re: God=G_uv Proof of 'Intelligent Design'***Russell E. Rierson (09/14/04)***Exposed Venn Diagrams***MHW (09/14/04)***Gödel, Turing, and Cantor***Michael Jørgensen (09/14/04)***Re: Gödel, Turing, and Cantor***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Michael Jørgensen (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Dave Seaman (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Michael Jørgensen (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Dave Seaman (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Torkel Franzen (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Dave Seaman (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Denis Feldmann (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Daryl McCullough (09/14/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Jeffrey Ketland (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Michael Jørgensen (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Torkel Franzen (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Jeffrey Ketland (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Jeffrey Ketland (09/16/04)***Re: Gdel, Turing, and Cantor***Michael Jørgensen (09/17/04)*

**Re: Gödel, Turing, and Cantor***Robert Israel (09/14/04)***Re: Gödel, Turing, and Cantor***ZZBunker (09/15/04)***Re: Gödel, Turing, and Cantor***Erland Gadde (09/15/04)***Re: Gödel, Turing, and Cantor***Gal Binyamini (09/15/04)*

**Shanks' SQUFOF***Chris Card (09/14/04)***lines in R^2***alliville (09/14/04)***c = (a1*v+b1)x+(a2*v+b2)y***XGR131 (09/14/04)***c1 continuity with 2 bezier curves***Tejas (09/13/04)***Pounds, Perelman and Poincare***George Cox (09/13/04)***complex analysis - normal familes question***si (09/13/04)***JSH: Working mathematician***James Harris (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Working mathematician***James Burns (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Working mathematician***Justin (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Working mathematician***Christian Bau (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Working mathematician***C. Bond (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Working mathematician***Rupert (09/14/04)***Re: JSH: Working mathematician***Van Jacques (09/14/04)*

**Availability of SML, a matrix library in C.***bq (09/13/04)***Matthew David Siebert - April 26th 1978***Dar K. (09/13/04)***Question from a hopeful future grad student***Jim Connell (09/13/04)***Number of combinations within 26 letters of the Alphabet***Navid Naghdi (09/13/04)***Can we use L'hopital rule here?***lihuijun (09/13/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***anon (09/13/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Thomas Nordhaus (09/13/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***The World Wide Wade (09/14/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Ronald Bruck (09/14/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Bill Dubuque (09/14/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***The World Wide Wade (09/15/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Daniel W. Johnson (09/15/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Dave Seaman (09/15/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***David C. Ullrich (09/15/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Bill Dubuque (09/15/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***The World Wide Wade (09/16/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Bill Dubuque (09/17/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Ronald Bruck (09/17/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Christopher (09/15/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***The World Wide Wade (09/16/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Lee Rudolph (09/16/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Denis Feldmann (09/15/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Bill Dubuque (09/15/04)*

**Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***Dae-jung Yoo (09/16/04)***Re: Can we use L'hopital rule here?***The World Wide Wade (09/17/04)*

**Geometry problem with a triangle***ghjk (09/13/04)***Probabilities problem (Easy-looking but tough for me).***George (09/13/04)***Re: Probabilities problem (Easy-looking but tough for me).***Jose H. Nieto (09/13/04)***Re: Probabilities problem (Easy-looking but tough for me).***Gerry Myerson (09/14/04)***Re: Probabilities problem (Easy-looking but tough for me).***George (09/14/04)***Re: Probabilities problem (Easy-looking but tough for me).***George (09/14/04)***Re: Probabilities problem (Easy-looking but tough for me).***George (09/14/04)*

**Re: Probabilities problem (Easy-looking but tough for me).***M.J.T. Guy (09/16/04)*

**Post-Office problem, three variables.***Carlos (09/13/04)***Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***George Cox (09/13/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Robert Israel (09/13/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Herman Rubin (09/13/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***George Cox (09/13/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Thomas Nordhaus (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Denis Feldmann (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Thomas Nordhaus (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Hero (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***David Bandel (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Herman Rubin (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***George Cox (09/14/04)*

**Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Anthony Cerrato (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Georg (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Anthony Cerrato (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Georg (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Anthony Cerrato (09/15/04)*

**Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Eric Gisse (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Gib Bogle (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***shedar (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Narasimham G.L. (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***David Ames (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***anon (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***G. A. Edgar (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***Bob Silverman (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***G.E Ivey (09/14/04)***Re: Is (any part of) mathematics an experimental science?***George Cox (09/14/04)*

**Log z in complex plane***Joan Martin (09/13/04)***Energy states of charges on necklaces***Paul Hjelmstad (09/13/04)***Nonlocal Unitary 4x4 Matrices***Gerardo Adesso (09/13/04)***Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/13/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***Robert Israel (09/13/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***shedar (09/14/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***David C. Ullrich (09/15/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/15/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***Dave Seaman (09/15/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***Chan-Ho Suh (09/16/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***David C. Ullrich (09/16/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***shedar (09/17/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***shedar (09/17/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***David C. Ullrich (09/17/04)***Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***shedar (09/17/04)*

**Re: Countably infinite Hausdorff topology?***The World Wide Wade (09/13/04)*

**Looking for a good definition of some of the syntax used in advanced mathematics.***Dylan Cashman (09/13/04)***Re: word problem***Bill Dubuque (09/13/04)***pdf of functions of random vectors***roy (09/13/04)***Re: math***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/13/04)***laser cooling***kurt stocklmeir (09/13/04)***animusic***Van Jacques (09/13/04)***average age of human inhabitant of earth***David Bandel (09/13/04)***weighted mean inequality***Chris (09/13/04)***Question about classical invariant theory***Bruno Blind (09/13/04)***example about Gaussian curvature***Krillqill (09/13/04)***Pythagoras: Alles ist Zahl***Hagen (09/13/04)***looking for mathematical limits for 3x3 rubix cube solving***Nick (09/13/04)***Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***James Harris (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***Paul Murray (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***David C. Ullrich (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***No Way (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***Randy Poe (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***C. Bond (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***Peter Pan (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***James Harris (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***James Harris (09/13/04)***Re: Factoring, bimodal distribution, simple approach?***James Harris (09/13/04)*

**The Human Factor***Guy Macon (09/13/04)***circular combinations***Zunbeltz Izaola (09/13/04)***Ideals and Factor Rings of nZ***William Elliot (09/13/04)***Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***edA-qa mort-ora-y (09/13/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***phil (09/13/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***edA-qa mort-ora-y (09/14/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***David W. Cantrell (09/14/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***edA-qa mort-ora-y (09/15/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***David W. Cantrell (09/15/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***edA-qa mort-ora-y (09/15/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***David W. Cantrell (09/15/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***edA-qa mort-ora-y (09/15/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***David W. Cantrell (09/16/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***edA-qa mort-ora-y (09/16/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***David W. Cantrell (09/16/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***edA-qa mort-ora-y (09/16/04)*

**Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***Rod (09/13/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***Randy Poe (09/13/04)***Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c***David W. Cantrell (09/14/04)*

**New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 13, 2004***PhDs.org Webmaster (09/13/04)***New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 13, 2004***PhDs.org Webmaster (09/13/04)***decomposing groups as direct products***Yves De Cornulier (09/13/04)***ITS, Inc. for Sale***Skidder von Cleese (09/13/04)***about kronecker's theorem..***mina_world (09/13/04)***Harrisment of sci.math - A useless rebuke!***Bill Taylor (09/13/04)***R3COGNITION OF THE HALTING SOLN***|-|erc (09/13/04)***Z and Baire Category Theorem***Tim Brauch (09/13/04)***equi-distant points on an ellipse***anonymous (09/13/04)***Milonni and Zee disagree on the Casimir force and both are wrong***Jack Sarfatti (09/13/04)***Environmental Problem Solving for Net Productivity***Druid (09/13/04)***Re: Analogy and Russell's Set***fishfry (09/13/04)***what is the latex font to produce the special letter 'R' (as 'real space')***Porky Pig Jr (09/13/04)***Re: what is the latex font to produce the special letter 'R' (as 'real space')***Trevor Malcolm (09/13/04)***Re: what is the latex font to produce the special letter 'R' (as 'real space')***Angus Rodgers (09/13/04)***Re: what is the latex font to produce the special letter 'R' (as 'real space')***José Carlos Santos (09/13/04)***Re: what is the latex font to produce the special letter 'R' (as 'real space')***Tim Norfolk (09/13/04)***Re: what is the latex font to produce the special letter 'R' (as 'real space')***Brett (09/13/04)***Re: what is the latex font to produce the special letter 'R' (as 'real space')***Porky Pig Jr (09/13/04)*

**Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***hanson (09/13/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/14/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Ilena Rose (09/14/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/14/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/15/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/16/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/19/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/19/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/20/04)***Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/21/04)*

**Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***hanson (09/14/04)*

**Re: Who profits from Kyoto? Not the environment (Avery)***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/21/04)*

**Re: Tricky base problem, need help***Miguel Vinuesa (09/13/04)***New group of infinite order?***Dement (09/13/04)***Area of circle to its circumference is a constant -approach to Pi***Eur Ing P.Stefanides (09/13/04)***Re: Area of circle to its circumference is a constant -approach to Pi***Daniel W. Johnson (09/13/04)***Re: Area of circle to its circumference is a constant -approach to Pi***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/14/04)***Re: Area of circle to its circumference is a constant -approach to Pi***anon (09/14/04)***Re: Area of circle to its circumference is a constant -approach to Pi***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/14/04)*

**Complex Analysis - I make a mistake somewhere.**(09/13/04) **Question***John Scott (09/13/04)***n equally spaced points around the ellipse's perimeter***Laurent Lucas (09/13/04)***Re: n equally spaced points around the ellipse's perimeter***Stan Brown (09/13/04)***Re: n equally spaced points around the ellipse's perimeter***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/13/04)***Re: n equally spaced points around the ellipse's perimeter***Narasimham G.L. (09/13/04)*

**matemathique _ What is this? Horror? Pleasent? Mental gymnastique?***Jean-Pierre Clemant (09/13/04)***the kth derivative of the nth iterate of a function***brian tenneson (09/13/04)***Integrating with respect to I and theta***ma740988 (09/12/04)***Re: covering with rectangles***Ruben (09/12/04)***Workshop on Algebraic K-theory 2004 -- Third Announcement***Dan Grayson (09/12/04)***Uncountable Borel Subsets***Desi Beat (09/12/04)***Cold Fusion Bombs?***Jack Sarfatti (09/12/04)***Problem 2G. Combinatorics/ van Lint & Wilson***Yotam Medini (09/12/04)***HW help, please: proof involving exponentials***Elana (09/12/04)***is this a nonnegative integer linear combination?***John Paul Steinberger (09/12/04)***Is my algebra proof flawed?***Warren065 (09/12/04)***Analytic function and conjugate***Isaac (09/12/04)***Harmonic function question***Isaac (09/12/04)***Composites, and neat relation***James Harris (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***The Last Danish Pastry (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Jim Burns (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Tim Smith (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Nate Smith (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***C. Bond (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Dik T. Winter (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Dik T. Winter (09/12/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***James Harris (09/13/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Paul Murray (09/13/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***James Harris (09/13/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***C. Bond (09/13/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***James Burns (09/14/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Nate Smith (09/14/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Dik T. Winter (09/13/04)***Re: Composites, and neat relation***Paul Murray (09/14/04)*

**Re: Composites, and neat relation***Dik T. Winter (09/13/04)*

**Re: Composites, and neat relation***David C. Ullrich (09/13/04)*

**non-symmetric intersection of sets***Rainer Rosenthal (09/12/04)***Spherical curves very confused***Count Dracula (09/12/04)***Casimir Force is not a Zero Point Force***Jack Sarfatti (09/12/04)***ALL THE MATEHMATICS YOU MISSED by Garrity***Stan Brown (09/12/04)***Vector Spaces***Paul Johnson (09/12/04)***non noetherian***singau (09/12/04)***Beatty sequences***Ruben (09/12/04)***Q: integrating rational functions -which formula to remember.***Dae-jung Yoo (09/12/04)***Spherical curves very confused***Isaac (09/12/04)***probability...~***mina_world (09/12/04)***JSH: Proof by contradiction***James Harris (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Proof by contradiction***David C. Ullrich (09/12/04)***Re: Proof by contradiction***Kerry Soileau (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Proof by contradiction***Jesse F. Hughes (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Proof by contradiction***The Ghost In The Machine (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Proof by contradiction***Tim Smith (09/12/04)*

**Sphere Construction***Peni (09/12/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***William Elliot (09/12/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***Peni (09/12/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***The Ghost In The Machine (09/12/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***Peni (09/13/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***Narasimham G.L. (09/13/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***The Ghost In The Machine (09/14/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***Alex Hunsley (09/14/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***The Ghost In The Machine (09/15/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***Randy Poe (09/14/04)***Re: Sphere Construction***Peni (09/23/04)*

**Math is such a BORING science !***G.K. Konnig (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Angus Rodgers (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Tim Brauch (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Stan Brown (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***David Bandel (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Abraham Buckingham (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Gib Bogle (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Chergarj (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Chergarj (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Thomas Nordhaus (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Gib Bogle (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Georg (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***shedar (09/14/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***shedar (09/14/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Gib Bogle (09/14/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Gib Bogle (09/14/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Thomas Nordhaus (09/14/04)*

**Re: Math is such a BORING science !***anon (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/12/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Porky Pig Jr (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Robin Chapman (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Robin Chapman (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Van Jacques (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Robin Chapman (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Robin Chapman (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***George Cox (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***George Cox (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Richard Henry (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Gib Bogle (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Gib Bogle (09/13/04)*

**Re: Math is such a BORING science !***Mitch Harris (09/13/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***George Cox (09/13/04)*

**Re: Math is such a BORING science !***David Ames (09/14/04)***Re: Math is such a BORING science !***marko_amnell_at_hotmail.com (09/14/04)*

**Convergence speed***Clifford J. Nelson (09/12/04)***Help Solving FT Problems***forums_mp (09/12/04)***Graduate school question***Ishamael (09/12/04)***I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***andy (09/12/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***Mensanator (09/12/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***Christian Bau (09/12/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***David C. Ullrich (09/12/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***Van Jacques (09/12/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***David Bandel (09/14/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***Randy Poe (09/15/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***David Bandel (09/15/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***Randy Poe (09/16/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***David Bandel (09/16/04)*

**Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/12/04)***Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you***gowan (09/16/04)*

**Journals Call for Papers***journal (09/12/04)***Call for Papers***journal (09/12/04)***Journals Call for Papers***journal (09/12/04)***Wiki as A Time Saver for Researchers***coolspeech_at_hotmail.com (09/12/04)***Gamma function - Graphical Analysis***D. Baruth (09/11/04)***Fractan by John Conway***Paulo Jorge O. C. Matos (09/11/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/12/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***James Harris (09/12/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/12/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***James Harris (09/13/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Arturo Magidin (09/13/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Arturo Magidin (09/14/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/14/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***David C. Ullrich (09/13/04)*

**Re: Null test, Wiles's work***David C. Ullrich (09/12/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Paul Murray (09/12/04)***Re: Null test, Wiles's work***Wayne Brown (09/13/04)*

**How to compute very large integers?***mobaladje (09/11/04)***Re: How to compute very large integers?***Thomas Heye (09/11/04)***Re: How to compute very large integers?***flip (09/12/04)***Re: How to compute very large integers?***Phil Carmody (09/12/04)***re:How to compute very large integers?***mobaladje (09/12/04)***re:How to compute very large integers?***mobaladje (09/12/04)*

**Re: Theorem concerning the internal structure of uncountable subsets of P(N).***ray (09/11/04)***easy algebra problem [ but not for me :( ]***dingo (09/11/04)***Donald Barry Schmidtke - February 8th 1968***Dar K. (09/11/04)***Benjamin H. Yandell, Mathematician, 53***DGH (09/11/04)***Easiest problem on the Earth... (but not for me)***dingo (09/11/04)***JSH circa 1996***Russell E. Rierson (09/11/04)***algebra...;***mina_world (09/11/04)***map between torus***alliville (09/11/04)***solution of log(x)+A*x/(1+B*x)***Angelo (09/11/04)***floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/11/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Thomas Heye (09/11/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/12/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Daniel W. Johnson (09/12/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Yuzuru Hiraga (09/12/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/13/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Yuzuru Hiraga (09/13/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Yuzuru Hiraga (09/13/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/14/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/14/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/12/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Daniel W. Johnson (09/12/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/13/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Daniel W. Johnson (09/13/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Ruben (09/13/04)***Re: floor(xn)/n***Daniel W. Johnson (09/13/04)*

**Re: floor(xn)/n***Ronald Bruck (09/13/04)*

**A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Thomas Heye (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Bob Silverman (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Ioannis (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***David Bandel (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***David C. Ullrich (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***David C. Ullrich (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Herman Rubin (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***David C. Ullrich (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***David C. Ullrich (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***David C. Ullrich (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/15/04)*

**Re: A simple question about integers***Dave Seaman (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***3.14159 (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Phil Carmody (09/11/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Randy Poe (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Randy Poe (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/16/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Rainer Rosenthal (09/15/04)*

**Re: A simple question about integers***Virgil (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/12/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***George Cox (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Denis Feldmann (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Phil Carmody (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***George Cox (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/15/04)*

**Re: A simple question about integers***anon (09/13/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Angus Rodgers (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Gottfried Helms (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Angus Rodgers (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Gottfried Helms (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Denis Feldmann (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Dik T. Winter (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Denis Feldmann (09/15/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Gottfried Helms (09/16/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Denis Feldmann (09/16/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Gottfried Helms (09/16/04)***Re: A simple question about integers***Eray Ozkural exa (09/15/04)*

**Re: A simple question about integers***Bill Dubuque (09/15/04)*

**Re: A simple question about integers***Jonathan Hoyle (09/15/04)*

**Internal Set Theory Uniqueness Principle***David McAnally (09/11/04)***Re: For ANY sets A, B: If A is proper subset of B then set B has more elts than set A.***Thomas Heye (09/11/04)***Distributivity of boolean algebras***Gilbert (09/11/04)***Tapped areas in Math research?***Ramin (09/11/04)***Re: jones formula***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/11/04)***content***Man (09/11/04)***premeasure***Stephanie (09/11/04)***Question about field***Herb (09/11/04)***Re: Question about field***Van Jacques (09/11/04)***Re: Question about field***Jon Haugsand (09/11/04)***Re: Question about field***William Elliot (09/11/04)***Re: Question about field***Ron Sperber (09/11/04)***Re: Question about field***Arturo Magidin (09/11/04)***Re: Question about field***Bill Dubuque (09/13/04)***Re: Question about field***Arturo Magidin (09/13/04)***Re: Question about field***Bill Dubuque (09/14/04)***Re: Question about field***Arturo Magidin (09/14/04)***Re: Question about field***Bill Dubuque (09/14/04)***Re: Question about field***Arturo Magidin (09/14/04)***Re: Question about field***Gerry Myerson (09/14/04)***Re: Question about field***David Hartley (09/14/04)***Re: Question about field***Bill Dubuque (09/15/04)*

**Re: Question about field***Virgil (09/12/04)*

**the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping and why FLT is also imprecise and thus false Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!***Archimedes Plutonium (09/11/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping and why FLT is also imprecise and thus false Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!***Michael Lockhart (09/11/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping and why FLT is also imprecise and thus false Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!***Archimedes Plutonium (09/11/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping and why FLT is also imprecise and thus false Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!***Archimedes Plutonium (09/12/04)**Christopher (09/12/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/13/04)**Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/14/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/15/04)*

*Tim Mellor (09/11/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/12/04)**Tim Mellor (09/12/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/12/04)**Tim Mellor (09/13/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/14/04)**Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/14/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/15/04)**Graham (09/22/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/22/04)**Graham (09/23/04)**Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/22/04)**Graham (09/23/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/23/04)**Graham (09/23/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/23/04)**Graham (09/23/04)**Graham (09/23/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/24/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/24/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Owen Jacobson (09/25/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Archimedes Plutonium (09/26/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Owen Jacobson (09/26/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Archimedes Plutonium (09/26/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Owen Jacobson (09/26/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Archimedes Plutonium (09/27/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Archimedes Plutonium (09/27/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Owen Jacobson (09/27/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Archimedes Plutonium (09/28/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/28/04)***Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Archimedes Plutonium (09/26/04)**Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/23/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/24/04)**Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/24/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/24/04)*

*Christopher (09/12/04)**Archimedes Plutonium (09/12/04)**David Bandel (09/13/04)**Brian (09/13/04)*

**Re: the imprecision of 4 color mapping and why it should be 2 color mapping***Dik T. Winter (09/12/04)**Brett (09/13/04)*

**whether EEE is intellectual theft of A.P. Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!***Archimedes Plutonium (09/11/04)***Hal Puthoff's Greatest Blunder on Zero Point Energy***Jack Sarfatti (09/11/04)***Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Peter J Ross (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Peter J Ross (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Peter J Ross (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Peter J Ross (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***yyyiiinnnggg (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Peter J Ross (09/11/04)***Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Aratzio (09/11/04)*

**Re: Herc, rat poison, and deliberate decisions to disrupt newsgroups***Stan Brown (09/11/04)*

**point of inflection AND extreme point***Troubled (09/11/04)***Re: point of inflection AND extreme point***Tim Brauch (09/11/04)***Re: point of inflection AND extreme point***Christopher Green (09/11/04)***Re: point of inflection AND extreme point***Narasimham G.L. (09/11/04)***Re: point of inflection AND extreme point***bernard massé (09/11/04)***Re: point of inflection AND extreme point***Stan Brown (09/11/04)***Re: point of inflection AND extreme point***Arturo Magidin (09/11/04)*

**Is there a possible mathematical function for this?***Michael Michalchik (09/11/04)***Re: Is there a possible mathematical function for this?***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/11/04)***Re: Is there a possible mathematical function for this?***Ruben (09/11/04)***Re: Is there a possible mathematical function for this?***Hero (09/11/04)***Re: Is there a possible mathematical function for this?***Ruben (09/12/04)*

**Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***andy (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Daniel Ryan (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Mensanator (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Van Jacques (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***andy (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Van Jacques (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Denis Feldmann (09/12/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Denis Feldmann (09/12/04)***[JSH] Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***William Rex Marshall (09/11/04)***Re: [JSH] Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Richard Henry (09/11/04)***Re: [JSH] Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Christian Bau (09/11/04)***Re: [JSH] Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Virgil (09/12/04)**andy (09/12/04)*

**Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Mensanator (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Richard Henry (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Russell E. Rierson (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Will Twentyman (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Marc Olschok (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Andrzej Kolowski (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/12/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Virgil (09/12/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Van Jacques (09/12/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***James Harris (09/19/04)***Re: Harassment by James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who support his attacks***Virgil (09/19/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/21/04)*

**Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Richard Henry (09/12/04)*

**Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Guenther von Knakspott (09/12/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***Jesse F. Hughes (09/12/04)***Re: Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.***David Moran (09/12/04)*

**Statics Word Problems***Chris S (09/11/04)***A Markov Chain deletion question***Helen (09/11/04)***Fixed-price recoding job (PERL -> C, Basic,...) available to perms/combs expert***David Halitsky (09/11/04)***JSH: Simplify, right?***James Harris (09/11/04)***conditional probability***Helen (09/11/04)***An exercise in cardinal exponentiation***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/11/04)***Amateur math, neat relation***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***C. Bond (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Mikito Harakiri (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Liviu (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Richard Henry (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Richard Tobin (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Count Dracula (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***James Harris (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***David C. Ullrich (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Richard Henry (09/13/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***David C. Ullrich (09/13/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Wayne Brown (09/13/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Andrzej Kolowski (09/13/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***C. Bond (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Liviu (09/13/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Wayne Brown (09/13/04)*

**Re: Amateur math, neat relation***James Harris (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur math, neat relation***Tim Smith (09/17/04)*

**JSH: Time, yes time***James Harris (09/11/04)***A_4, alternating group***Isaac (09/10/04)***Chain derivative of inverse matrix***albert blunsen (09/10/04)***equivalence relation on a set***Marios Koumides (09/10/04)***complex analysis question***si (09/10/04)***question on normal families***si (09/10/04)***Moscow - San Francisco Forum on Zero Point Energy & Gravity***Jack Sarfatti (09/10/04)***Finding Normal Unit Vectors***Will Oram (09/10/04)***Dirac delta functions***Phil Cowans (09/10/04)***POST OPERATIONAL COMPLICATIONS... BILL CLINTON IS DEAD***David Bandel (09/10/04)***Problems getting Eigenvalues/Eigenvectors with Tred2 and Tqli***PeterOut (09/10/04)***Re: Integer matrices with maximal number of different determinants***Hugo Pfoertner (09/10/04)***known pairwise balance design?***Alireza Abdollahi (09/10/04)***Polynomial algorithm to calculate area between intersect rectangles***Michal (09/10/04)***Nancy Lynn Bayliss - January 24th 1985***Dar K. (09/10/04)***Householder QR decomposition***Franck Michel (09/10/04)***lower limit of largest eigenvalue?***papu (09/10/04)***strange 2***mina_world (09/10/04)***strange 1***mina_world (09/10/04)***re-written - Pythagoras, Symmetry and Lagrange - sorry it was so bad***richard miller (09/10/04)***NEWSFLASH: Closed form solution of the quintic & above***Gregory Toomey (09/10/04)***Re: NEWSFLASH: Closed form solution of the quintic & above***Peter Webb (09/10/04)***Re: NEWSFLASH: Closed form solution of the quintic & above***Bob Silverman (09/10/04)***Re: NEWSFLASH: Closed form solution of the quintic & above***Uncle Al (09/10/04)***Re: NEWSFLASH: Closed form solution of the quintic & above***shedar (09/10/04)*

**Good workbook or site for lots and lots of algebra problems?***Marcie (09/10/04)***empty set as nowhere dense set***Joy (09/10/04)***3D Geometry vector problem***Steve James (09/10/04)***Hint for proof***Thomas Heye (09/10/04)***differential gear***Ruben (09/10/04)***J. Harris????***Ita Cirovic (09/10/04)***hilbert space***Tobin Fricke (09/10/04)***Re: Sin Cos Tan, why not Sin Sec Tan?***Thomas Heye (09/10/04)***in the news: roots to any polynomial***Bouwman (09/10/04)***Free T-Shirt from Sharewareisland.com***FreewareTown.com (09/10/04)***universal ordered set***urizen (09/10/04)***Fast CRC calculations***Gershon Shamay (09/10/04)***equation of the small numbers***David Bandel (09/10/04)***experience in the maths..***David Bandel (09/10/04)***matrix plusses and minuses and times. but divides..***David Bandel (09/10/04)***algebras is so EZy***David Bandel (09/10/04)***james harris is smart man...***David Bandel (09/10/04)***prime numbers and teasing the teachers***David Bandel (09/10/04)***the commutativity of transportation***David Bandel (09/10/04)***cross product in higher dimensions...***David Bandel (09/10/04)***maths for the calculations....!!!!???***David Bandel (09/10/04)***infiniquations***David Bandel (09/10/04)***calculational equations on science!***David Bandel (09/10/04)***powerful functions on the equations..???***David Bandel (09/10/04)***calculus of the equations***David Bandel (09/10/04)***JSH: Fun, weird, sad, cool***James Harris (09/10/04)***Re: JSH: Fun, weird, sad, cool***Mensanator (09/10/04)***Re: JSH: Fun, weird, sad, cool***Jesse F. Hughes (09/10/04)***Re: JSH: Fun, weird, sad, cool***LarryLard (09/10/04)***Re: JSH: Fun, weird, sad, cool***Tim Smith (09/10/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***The Last Danish Pastry (09/10/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***James Harris (09/10/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***The Last Danish Pastry (09/11/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***The Last Danish Pastry (09/11/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***The Last Danish Pastry (09/12/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***David C. Ullrich (09/12/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/11/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/11/04)***Re: Fun, weird, sad, cool***C. Bond (09/11/04)*

**Lower bound on largest eigenvalue***papu (09/10/04)***Contour integrals, Cauchy's theorem(s)***Isaac (09/10/04)***Another curvature question***Isaac (09/10/04)***Is it possible to turn discrete pdfs into continuous via penalty functions?***MDM news (09/10/04)***Basic Torsion, Curvature question***Isaac (09/10/04)***Root question***BCC (09/10/04)***Pythagoras, Symmetry and Lagrange***richard miller (09/10/04)***Never have so many been so wrong about so much!***Jack Sarfatti (09/10/04)***Interesting idea's about ZPE, Quantum Vacuum, consciousness and sytem philosophy.***elcee (09/09/04)***Re: [Herc] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Kent Paul Dolan (09/09/04)***Re: [Herc] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Simon G Best (09/10/04)***Amie Beth McKenzie - April 9th 1982***Dar K. (09/09/04)***base6***Tim923 (09/09/04)***Inequalities***Steve (09/09/04)***Pattern recognition problem***Hui Wang (09/09/04)***Book on Singular Value Decompostion***Peng Yu (09/09/04)***These are the folks from the....***hanson (09/09/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Ioannis (09/09/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***John Hicken (09/09/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***OG (09/09/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***hanson (09/09/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Richard Henry (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***hanson (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Richard Henry (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***hanson (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Richard Henry (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Richard Henry (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***hanson (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Richard Henry (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***hanson (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***OG (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***hanson (09/10/04)*

**Re: These are the folks from the....***Richard Tobin (09/09/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***richard miller (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Randy Poe (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***concerned man (09/10/04)***Re: These are the folks from the....***Dirk Bruere at Neopax (09/12/04)*

**Interesting Posers***Vikram (09/09/04)***mathematics of foodular***David Bandel (09/09/04)***Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Ivo (09/09/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Christopher J. Henrich (09/09/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Saint Cad (09/10/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Dik T. Winter (09/10/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Ivo (09/10/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Robin Chapman (09/10/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Dik T. Winter (09/11/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Paul Beekhuizen (09/11/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Robin Chapman (09/11/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Paul Beekhuizen (09/11/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Robin Chapman (09/11/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Paul Beekhuizen (09/11/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Dik T. Winter (09/12/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Wilbert Dijkhof (09/13/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Dik T. Winter (09/14/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Bill Dubuque (09/14/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Wilbert Dijkhof (09/14/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Dik T. Winter (09/14/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Bill Dubuque (09/14/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Paul Beekhuizen (09/14/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Gieljan de Vries (09/14/04)***Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***Dik T. Winter (09/15/04)*

**Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?***shedar (09/10/04)*

**Typo fix***Todd Trimble (09/09/04)***Re: 20 years of DNA profiling***Paul Nutteing (09/09/04)***More on Dark Energy***Jack Sarfatti (09/09/04)***Measuring rates***DNP (09/09/04)***Upper bound for 2^omega?***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/09/04)***um....this is...***mina_world (09/09/04)***Re: Solving equation x^k mod m =a in Maple with very large number***Don Coppersmith (09/09/04)***calculus is flawed.............***David Bandel (09/09/04)***Grothendieck's Autobiography***Nicolas Ojeda Baer (09/09/04)***what's the joint probability***Helen (09/09/04)***k is coprime to m, 1 <= k <= m/r***Leroy Quet (09/09/04)***Recursively Rotated Possible Permutation***Leroy Quet (09/09/04)***Criss-crossing an n-gon***Leroy Quet (09/09/04)***Crazy theorem (help !)***olivier (09/09/04)***Why One Should Not Get Excited Doing Mathematics***John T Lowry (09/09/04)***Quaternion Factor Space Sequences, Update to "FAMP"***Dement (09/09/04)***sigma algebra***Man (09/09/04)***Prime counting connections***James Harris (09/09/04)***Re: The Hilbert Action***ZZBunker (09/09/04)***"Divulgaciones Matematicas" new site***Jose H. Nieto (09/09/04)***int??? help***--:: Diz_at_lic@ ::-- (09/09/04)***sci.lang,sci.math,sci.med,sci.misc,scot.tld***matthew parker (09/09/04)***expansion of \int f(t) exp(kt) dt***Tom Weston (09/09/04)***Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/09/04)***[|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Simon G Best (09/09/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Simon G Best (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Howard (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Kent Paul Dolan (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Rob Duncan (09/13/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Acme Diagnostics (09/13/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Kent Paul Dolan (09/13/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Rob Duncan (09/13/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Kent Paul Dolan (09/13/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/10/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)*

**Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***BostonBlackie© (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Lady Chatterly (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***BostonBlackie© (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Lady Chatterly (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***BostonBlackie© (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***BostonBlackie© (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Lady Chatterly (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***BostonBlackie© (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Lady Chatterly (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Lady Chatterly (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Wally Anglesea (09/12/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***|-|erc (09/11/04)***Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)*

**Re: [|-|erc] Re: [PO] Halting Problem Final Conclusion***Aratzio (09/11/04)***TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***riverman (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Guyz-N-Flyz (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***riverman (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Lloyd Randall (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Mark Brader (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Mark Brader (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Marcia Pease (09/09/04)*

**Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Narasimham G.L. (09/10/04)*

**Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Anthony Garcia (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Paul Skoczylas (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Paul Skoczylas (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/09/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Paul Skoczylas (09/10/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Michael Mendelsohn (09/10/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Mike Connor (09/10/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Paul Skoczylas (09/10/04)*

**Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/10/04)***Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers***Frank Reid (09/15/04)*

**How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Sonja Kisa (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Ron Blom (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Alois Steindl (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Richard Henry (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Ron Blom (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***shedar (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***John O'Flaherty (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Daniel Ryan (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Richard Henry (09/09/04)*

**Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***John Smith (09/10/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/10/04)*

**Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Rod (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Christian Bau (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Dave Seaman (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***briggs_at_encompasserve.org (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Henri H. Arsenault (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/10/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***richard miller (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/10/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Lash Rambo (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/10/04)*

**Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Amos Soma (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/09/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Theo van der Storm (09/10/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/11/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/11/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Theo van der Storm (09/13/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Rick Decker (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***KRamsay (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Phil Carmody (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Phil Carmody (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Theo van der Storm (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/17/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Henri Arsenault (09/17/04)***Re: How long IF IT IS A DRAW?***Theo van der Storm (09/18/04)***Re: How long IF IT IS A DRAW?***Guy Macon (09/18/04)***Re: How long IF IT IS A DRAW?***Keith Ramsay (09/20/04)***Quantum algorithms and complexity of computation***Theo van der Storm (09/20/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Ed Seedhouse (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***shedar (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Ed Seedhouse (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Ed Seedhouse (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/13/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Richard Henry (09/13/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/13/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/13/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Theo van der Storm (09/13/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Theo van der Storm (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/17/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/19/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***fs (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/13/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Sean O'Leathlobhair (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Denis Feldmann (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Sean O'Leathlobhair (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Denis Feldmann (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Sean O'Leathlobhair (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***fs (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Sean O'Leathlobhair (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Dr A. N. Walker (09/15/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Phil Carmody (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Robert Hyatt (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Dr A. N. Walker (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Sean O'Leathlobhair (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Dr A. N. Walker (09/16/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Sean O'Leathlobhair (09/17/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/12/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Luigi Caselli (09/12/04)*

**Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/14/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/17/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***somex (09/19/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/20/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Robert Hyatt (09/20/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Denis Feldmann (09/20/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Guy Macon (09/20/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Robert Hyatt (09/20/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bohm (09/21/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Gaz (09/23/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Henri H. Arsenault (09/23/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/20/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Robert Hyatt (09/21/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***David Bandel (09/21/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***Robert Hyatt (09/21/04)***Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?***nospam_at_nospam.com (09/20/04)*

**Re: Positive and Negative numbers***Bill Dubuque (09/09/04)***idempotents in jacobson radical***si (09/09/04)***polygon inscribed within circle***Dan Dryden (09/09/04)***Prime counting compression***James Harris (09/09/04)***Easy Question***Druid (09/08/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***James Harris (09/08/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Saint Cad (09/09/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Jesse F. Hughes (09/09/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Paul Murray (09/11/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Daniel Ryan (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Denis Feldmann (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Denis Feldmann (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/12/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Denis Feldmann (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Quinn Tyler Jackson (09/13/04)***Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)*

**Re: JSH: Curious, Wiles's work, null test***C. Bond (09/09/04)*

**triple lattice on a nondodecative exahedron***David Bandel (09/08/04)***the algebra of hyperspheres***David Bandel (09/08/04)***sexual mathematics!!!***David Bandel (09/08/04)***mathematics of rapping..***David Bandel (09/08/04)***derivative of x!***David Bandel (09/08/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Daniel McLaury (09/08/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Bob Silverman (09/09/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Keith A. Lewis (09/09/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Leroy Quet (09/09/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Rob Johnson (09/09/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Bob Silverman (09/10/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Bob Silverman (09/10/04)***Re: derivative of x!***Rob Johnson (09/10/04)***Re: derivative of x!***D. Baruth (09/10/04)*

**mathematics of the powerful integers***David Bandel (09/08/04)***random number generation critique***David Bandel (09/08/04)***Integer Solutions?***richard miller (09/08/04)***R/S-plus Course***In Princeton & Boston,***R/Splus Fundamentals and Programming Techniques, september - October, 2004***Sue Turner (09/08/04)***help in random graphs***Leonardo B. Oliveira (09/08/04)***Modular Forms of Non-Integral Weight***Trav (09/08/04)***Shawn Paul Janzen - September 19th 1977***Dar K. (09/08/04)***An idle integration question***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/08/04)***Combinatorial Problem***Getulio Romao Campos Junior (09/08/04)***3D algebra***julien (09/08/04)***Anyone familiar with applications of the "skip-fib" seq 1 2 5 13 34 89 233 610, ...***David Halitsky (09/08/04)***What's the transition matrix of this matrix***Helen (09/08/04)***curiosity with continued fractions***Gottfried Helms (09/08/04)***Re.complex 1***Hero (09/08/04)***covering space***alliville (09/08/04)***Common wrong ideas about zero point energy and gravity***Jack Sarfatti (09/08/04)***Inverse of this matrix, Radon xfrm***Derek Ross (09/08/04)***residue....-***mina_world (09/08/04)***semifinite measures***Artur (09/08/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram( mathematica) delusional?***Zim Olson (09/08/04)***Re: Open Letter to Serre Regarding Grothendieck***Russ Brown (09/08/04)***Is this correct?***Ron Blom (09/08/04)***?***phywhat (09/08/04)***can anyone show me how to work this out???***phywhat (09/08/04)***That Pesky Diophatine Equation***richard miller (09/08/04)***On the foundations (of logic and arithmetic)***Tomek (09/08/04)***Re: Need Proof for Simple Set Problem***Lindsey Wright (09/08/04)***perturbed matrix***Matrix (09/08/04)***Opportunities in LaTeX***Unni K V (09/08/04)***Geometry help***jax (09/08/04)***Multiplicative group of units (Z_p^2)^****William Elliot (09/08/04)***Re: Multiplicative group of units (Z_p^2)^****Van Jacques (09/08/04)***Re: Multiplicative group of units (Z_p^2)^****William Elliot (09/09/04)***Re: Multiplicative group of units (Z_p^2)^****Van Jacques (09/09/04)***Multiplicative group of units (Z_p^2)^****William Elliot (09/09/04)***Cyclic (Z_p^k)^****William Elliot (09/10/04)***Re: Cyclic (Z_p^k)^****Van Jacques (09/11/04)***Re: Cyclic (Z_p^k)^****William Elliot (09/12/04)***Re: Cyclic (Z_p^k)^****Van Jacques (09/12/04)***Re: Cyclic (Z_p^k)^****William Elliot (09/12/04)*

**Comments on the proof of cyclic Z*_p^k***Van Jacques (09/08/04)***linear algebra***Lanbaba (09/08/04)***Fibonacci numbers, Lucas numbers and Huffman codes***Alex Vinokur (09/08/04)***HELP: Modulus of a fraction***Faraz Khan (09/08/04)***complex 2***mina_world (09/08/04)***complex 1***mina_world (09/08/04)***Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***N.C. (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***William Elliot (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***Robin Chapman (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***William Elliot (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***Jyrki Lahtonen (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***Robin Chapman (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***Jyrki Lahtonen (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***William Elliot (09/08/04)***Re: Prime ideals in comm. ring - HELP!***Anno Siegel (09/08/04)*

**Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/08/04)***Re: Missing 757***Keith A. Lewis (09/08/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/09/04)***Re: Missing 757***K. Jones (09/09/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/09/04)***Re: Missing 757***G. R. L. Cowan (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***G. R. L. Cowan (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***bw (09/11/04)***Re: Missing 757***Edward Green (09/13/04)***Re: Missing 757***Edward Green (09/13/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/14/04)***Re: Missing 757***Edward Green (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***Bill Ward (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***K. Jones (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***K. Jones (09/11/04)***Re: Missing 757***Bill Ward (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/10/04)***Re: Missing 757***Bill Ward (09/11/04)***Re: Missing 757***Tim Ward (09/11/04)***Re: Missing 757***Dan Bloomquist (09/11/04)***Solar powered airplanes was: Re: Missing 757***Tim Ward (09/11/04)*

**p+q=2n n>1***stprime (09/08/04)***Diophantine equations with infinitely many solutions (& Chaitin's Omega)***3.14159 (09/08/04)***Cauchy's Integral Formula***Isaac (09/08/04)***Distribution of decimal digits***Zork Adi (09/08/04)***Stabilizer question***Isaac (09/08/04)***Permutation with repetition algorithm needed***Emir Palandi (09/08/04)***NP-hardness of k-means clustering***Stas Busygin (09/08/04)***Poincare's conjecture solved?***Jerry Comisar (09/08/04)***Decomposition of function multiplication***Leonel Wiford (09/07/04)***a question about Markov Chain***Helen (09/07/04)***Complex Weirdness***Ramin (09/07/04)***A simple problem on real analysis.***Dae-jung Yoo (09/07/04)***A Review of Chaitin's e-book "Omega"***Eray Ozkural exa (09/07/04)***further my study***christopher (09/07/04)***Christine Alison Paterson - May 2nd 1980***Dar K. (09/07/04)***Christine Alison Paterson - May 2nd 1980***Dar K. (09/07/04)***Analytic interpolation***Ioannis (09/07/04)***Questions on the Wiener algebra***Alan (09/07/04)***n! = a! b!***Rick Decker (09/07/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Gerry Myerson (09/07/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Pete Klimek (09/08/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Mrs Unreliable (09/08/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Phil Carmody (09/08/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Denis Feldmann (09/08/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Keith A. Lewis (09/08/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Robert Israel (09/09/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Mrs Unreliable (09/09/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***The Last Danish Pastry (09/09/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Keith A. Lewis (09/10/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***Daniel W. Johnson (09/10/04)***Re: n! = a! b!***KRamsay (09/10/04)*

**Re: n! = a! b!***Kevin Stern (09/08/04)***Re: n! = a! b! - Partial solution***Daniel Ryan (09/10/04)*

**Charting transformations***Mat (09/07/04)***Infinite cardinal number***TCL (09/07/04)***a series divergence problem***Dae-jung Yoo (09/07/04)***Least Square Estimation problem***yannick (09/07/04)***Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems...***Jerry Freedman (09/07/04)***Math Cobweb Game***Leroy Quet (09/07/04)***Re: On the partial sums of reciprocals of primes***erdos fan (09/07/04)***Do you know the counter example?***Stephen (09/07/04)***Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset***Daryl McCullough (09/07/04)***Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset***David C. Ullrich (09/07/04)***Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset***r.e.s. (09/07/04)***Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset***Pierre Asselin (09/08/04)*

**Localization without using Wavelet***Tontoko Hirorin (09/07/04)***theorems/problems with lots of quantifiers***Mitch Harris (09/07/04)***Re: theorems/problems with lots of quantifiers***The Last Danish Pastry (09/07/04)***Re: theorems/problems with lots of quantifiers***Aatu Koskensilta (09/07/04)***Re: theorems/problems with lots of quantifiers***Tim Mellor (09/07/04)***Re: theorems/problems with lots of quantifiers***biedl_at_uwaterloo.ca (09/07/04)***Re: theorems/problems with lots of quantifiers***Pierre Asselin (09/08/04)***Re: theorems/problems with lots of quantifiers***alpha_uma (09/09/04)*

**Fokker-Plank and Diffusive equations***ATurbin (09/07/04)***Weird Trigonometric Identity***Andrew Duncan (09/07/04)***Speculative, but at least interesting***Sam Wormley (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Morituri-Max (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Randy Poe (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Morituri-Max (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Jesse F. Hughes (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***KRamsay (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Jon Miller (09/08/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***KRamsay (09/08/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Christopher J. Henrich (09/09/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Sam Wormley (09/07/04)*

**Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Myxococcus xanthus (09/07/04)*

**Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Jesse F. Hughes (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Uncle Al (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Bob Silverman (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Marko Amnell (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Bob Silverman (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Bob Silverman (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Marko Amnell (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Todd Trimble (09/07/04)***Re: Speculative, but at least interesting***Robin Chapman (09/08/04)*

**simple pde question..***shevek (09/07/04)***Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Bobby (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Arthur J. O'Dwyer (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Shedar (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Bascule (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Nathan (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***KRamsay (09/08/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Nathan (09/08/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Dave Seaman (09/08/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Stephen J. Herschkorn (09/09/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Herman Rubin (09/09/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***KRamsay (09/09/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Herman Rubin (09/09/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Shedar (09/08/04)*

**Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Ron Sperber (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Norm Dresner (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***herschko_at_rutcor.rutgers.edu (09/07/04)***Re: Definition of Axiom of Choice?***Shedar (09/08/04)*

**Trying to solve 2 homogenous quadratics***anonymous (09/06/04)***Re: Trying to solve 2 homogenous quadratics***John Ramsden (09/07/04)***Re: Trying to solve 2 homogenous quadratics***Keith A. Lewis (09/07/04)***Re: Trying to solve 2 homogenous quadratics***anon (09/07/04)***Re: Trying to solve 2 homogenous quadratics***John R Ramsden (09/19/04)***Re: Trying to solve 2 homogenous quadratics***John R Ramsden (09/25/04)*

**Re: 2 triginometric equations with 2 unknowns (angles)***phil (09/06/04)***Problem with inner product***Joachim (09/06/04)***Information on Prime Number Theorem***erdos fan (09/06/04)***Jennifer Laura Aucoin - September 11th 1986***Dar K. (09/06/04)***Yvonne Cecilia Dyok - July 5th 1973***Dar K. (09/06/04)***continued fractions: upper bounds for coefficients? and: something known about cf with coefficients other than integer?***Gottfried Helms (09/06/04)***Question: Divisors of the difference of unknown primes***Christopher (09/06/04)***help with transposition, dot product***jeff (09/06/04)***Quotient rings - help!***N.C. (09/06/04)***cone manifold***Dick Fischbeck (09/06/04)***Very easy number theorry exercises***Van Jacques (09/06/04)***Product of decimal digits***Paul Pollack (09/06/04)***Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/06/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***flip (09/06/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Phil Carmody (09/06/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Norm Dresner (09/07/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/07/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/07/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Scott Wilber (09/08/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/08/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Mensanator (09/08/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***ZZBunker (09/08/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Luis A. Rodriguez (09/08/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***ZZBunker (09/08/04)***Re: Is this a good Random Number Generator?***Phil Carmody (09/07/04)*

**Norm of Fractal Function***Tontoko Hirorin (09/06/04)***Help with Boolean Algebra***Kris Wheeler (09/06/04)***A question on Stirling number***tcs_chen (09/06/04)***A solution to a quadratic problem***Yue Wu (09/06/04)***well-ordering***dominique (09/06/04)***dynkin system***man (09/06/04)***Sheaf exercises***Jose Capco (09/06/04)***inverse laplace transform***ZHANG Yan (09/06/04)***Alicequeenox***Sedna (09/06/04)***New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org***PhDs.org Webmaster (09/06/04)***Delee Ann Eckl - August 10th 1979***Dar K. (09/06/04)***Katherine Dawn Thompson - January 9th 1983***Dar K. (09/06/04)***Re: A Series of Interest***David W. Cantrell (09/06/04)***Sums equal to squares of primes***Axel Harvey (09/06/04)***Are logarithms still useful?***John Smith (09/05/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***David Moran (09/05/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Chergarj (09/05/04)***re:Are logarithms still useful?***mathman (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Peter L. Montgomery (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Stan Brown (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Brett (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***John Coleman (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***The Ghost In The Machine (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***ZZBunker (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Stan Brown (09/07/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***ZZBunker (09/08/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Herman Rubin (09/08/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***ZZBunker (09/08/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Herman Rubin (09/09/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Jesse F. Hughes (09/09/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Joseph Hertzlinger (09/12/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***ZZBunker (09/13/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Joseph Hertzlinger (09/13/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Jesse F. Hughes (09/13/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***ZZBunker (09/14/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Joseph Hertzlinger (09/15/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***ZZBunker (09/15/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***ZZBunker (09/09/04)*

**Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Martin Penderis (09/06/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***matt (09/07/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Eur Ing Panagiotis Stefanides (09/07/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Herman Rubin (09/07/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***David Ames (09/08/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***Eur Ing Panagiotis Stefanides (09/08/04)***Re: Are logarithms still useful?***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/08/04)*

**Re: Euklidean algorithm***Bill Dubuque (09/05/04)***Re: GCD for Rational Numbers***Bill Dubuque (09/05/04)***Motives***Isaac Khabaza (09/05/04)***conspiracy in sci.math***Hero (09/05/04)***Euler's lemma ??***Van Jacques (09/05/04)***Too funny :-)***Julien Santini (09/05/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Thomas Nordhaus (09/05/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Chergarj (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Michael Lockhart (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Stan Brown (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Mitch Harris (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***William Elliot (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Mitch Harris (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***richard miller (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Stan Brown (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Jesse F. Hughes (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***richard miller (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Mitch Harris (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Phil Carmody (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Mitch Harris (09/06/04)*

**Re: Too funny :-)***Jon Haugsand (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***John Greene (09/06/04)*

**Re: Too funny :-)***G. A. Edgar (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***David C. Ullrich (09/06/04)***Re: Too funny :-)***Patrick Fleury (09/08/04)*

**Re: JSH: So what's the point?***Lawrence Runacres (09/05/04)***Algebra Helper***Allan Adler (09/05/04)***how come calculus can be exact?***ashok (09/05/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Bill (09/05/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Robert Israel (09/05/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Phil Holman (09/05/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Stan Brown (09/06/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/06/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Norm Dresner (09/07/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Ken S. Tucker (09/07/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Dave Seaman (09/07/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Stan Brown (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Richard Henry (09/07/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Ken S. Tucker (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Dave Seaman (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Ken S. Tucker (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Dave Seaman (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Ken S. Tucker (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Dave Seaman (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Richard Henry (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Daniel Grubb (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Richard Henry (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Ken S. Tucker (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Richard Henry (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Daniel Grubb (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Ken S. Tucker (09/08/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Daniel Grubb (09/09/04)***Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/09/04)*

**Re: how come calculus can be exact?***Michael Barr (09/07/04)*

**Radius of convergence, really confused***Isaac (09/05/04)***Contour integral question***Isaac (09/05/04)***Power series expansion of square root of z***Isaac (09/05/04)***real anal.-> L-R-N decomposition?***zujalica (09/05/04)***Power series expansion of log(z)***Isaac (09/05/04)***A Non Linear Trigonometric Expression for P i .***Eur Ing Panagiotis Stefanides (09/05/04)***Re: A Non Linear Trigonometric Expression for P i .***A N Niel (09/05/04)***Re: A Non Linear Trigonometric Expression for P i .***G.L.Narasimham (09/05/04)***Re: A Non Linear Trigonometric Expression for P i .***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/05/04)***Re: A Non Linear Trigonometric Expression for P i .***anonymous_at_mathforum.org (09/07/04)*

**Linear system of equations***Geert-Jan Uytdewilligen (09/05/04)***Characteristic function of multinormal quadratic form***Tao Cui (09/05/04)***Re: Complex patterns***B.S.Rangaswamy (09/05/04)***Unique factorization***Van Jacques (09/05/04)***Talent test problem***Vikram (09/05/04)***formal power series and local rings***Prasanna (09/05/04)***Constancy of C/d in Euclidean Geometry***Shedar (09/05/04)***Mental Calculation***John Taffy (09/05/04)***Space between H2O molecules***Druid (09/05/04)***Dense Subset of the Complex Numbers***eddie (09/05/04)***Gamma Functio***D. Baruth (09/05/04)***Terminology question (term for 'absolute difference')***Mario Tanev (09/04/04)***Absolute Continuity Problem from Royden***mr0x (09/04/04)***stupid question***shiggy (09/04/04)***Sturm-Liouville with Singular BCs***Professor Gauss (09/04/04)***Input PQR:(Z=P+Q; X=P+R; Y=Q+R) and its FLT deal related with input TAB:(Z=T+A+B; X=T+B; Y=T+A)***Roman B. Binder (09/04/04)***least-deficient numbers: sigma(n) = 2n-1***mark griffith (09/04/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***mark griffith (09/04/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***3.14159 (09/04/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Roger L. Bagula (09/04/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Roger L. Bagula (09/04/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Robin Chapman (09/05/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Michael Barr (09/05/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***KRamsay (09/06/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***David C. Ullrich (09/06/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Narasimham G.L. (09/12/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/13/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Denis Feldmann (09/13/04)***Cantor [ was Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Georg (09/13/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/14/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Robin Chapman (09/14/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/15/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Robin Chapman (09/15/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Edwin Clark (09/15/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Narasimham G.L. (09/16/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Dave Rusin (09/16/04)*

**Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***David C. Ullrich (09/05/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***anon (09/05/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Stan Brown (09/05/04)***Re: Is Stephen Wolfram (mathematica) delusional?***Yuzuru Hiraga (09/06/04)*

**Hilbert-Schmidt norm***Felix (09/04/04)***there is at least a prime between kn and (k+1)n ???***Paul (09/04/04)***Re: there is at least a prime between kn and (k+1)n ???***Virgil (09/04/04)***Re: there is at least a prime between kn and (k+1)n ???***Marcel Martin (09/04/04)***Re: there is at least a prime between kn and (k+1)n ???***Bill Dubuque (09/04/04)***Re: there is at least a prime between kn and (k+1)n ???***Dan (09/05/04)***Re: there is at least a prime between kn and (k+1)n ???***Michael Barr (09/05/04)*

**George Ryan Manolis Yannacoulias - June 4th 1983***Dar K. (09/04/04)***Still wasting your time on that silly numerology crap, Daryl?***Stan de SD (09/16/04)*

**Re: Irrational number!***Bill Dubuque (09/04/04)***i'm happy about the world trade tower bombing***David Bandel (09/04/04)***Re: i'm happy about the world trade tower bombing***David Moran (09/04/04)***Re: i'm happy about the world trade tower bombing***Fikret Skrgic (09/04/04)***Re: i'm happy about the world trade tower bombing***Paul Burridge (09/05/04)***Re: i'm happy about the world trade tower bombing***Joseph Hertzlinger (09/06/04)*

**Scientific analysis of gases (Avogadro's law)***Steve (09/04/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/04/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***pikalaw (09/04/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Shedar (09/05/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/05/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***pikalaw (09/05/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Shedar (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Shedar (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***TMG (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Shedar (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***TMG (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Shedar (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***TMG (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***pikalaw (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Shedar (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Shedar (09/06/04)*

**Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***Russell E. Rierson (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***bv_schornak (09/06/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/07/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***bv_schornak (09/07/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/08/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***TMG (09/08/04)***Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism***George Hammond (09/08/04)*

**A Simple Number Theory Problem***Bob Silverman (09/04/04)***Re: A Simple Number Theory Problem***Mok-Kong Shen (09/04/04)***Re: A Simple Number Theory Problem***3.14159 (09/04/04)***Re: A Simple Number Theory Problem***Marcel Martin (09/04/04)***Math books available online***David Ames (09/04/04)***Re: If we did not use***Zim Olson (09/04/04)***Re: Mathematical Argument For the Existence of God***lightsoul (09/04/04)***Applied Continuous Markov Random Fields?***Simo Särkkä (09/04/04)***Math at Princeton***Van Jacques (09/04/04)***Percentage change formula involving negative numbers***Petre Huile (09/04/04)***The theory of everthing***Van Jacques (09/04/04)***Re: Invariant Galilean Transformations (FAQ) On All Laws***David McAnally (09/04/04)***Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/04/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/04/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***G. A. Edgar (09/04/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***Narasimham G.L. (09/04/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/04/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***Narasimham G.L. (09/05/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***Hero (09/05/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***N. Silver (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***Narasimham G.L. (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***Hero (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***Narasimham G.L. (09/06/04)***Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***pikalaw (09/06/04)*

**Re: Generalized Pursuit Curve Problem***Surendar Jeyadev (09/07/04)*

**FLT in Terms of One Variable***Russell E. Rierson (09/04/04)***not sure what kind of problem this is***Ryan (09/04/04)***resistance of infinate matrix***divot (09/04/04)***Do things/events happen/occur randomly without a reason?***Zim Olson (09/04/04)***Simple question regarding open set in metric space***beihai (09/04/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***Ron Sperber (09/04/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***Marc Olschok (09/04/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***3.14159 (09/04/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***Daniel Ryan (09/05/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***beihai (09/05/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***Yogi (09/06/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***Yogi (09/06/04)***Re: Simple question regarding open set in metric space***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/06/04)*

**Definition of complex sphere?***Paul C. Leopardi (09/04/04)***Re: Taylor's Series for Operator***Andy Y (09/04/04)***Nathan Dale Whiteside - September 30th 1998***Dar K. (09/03/04)***Yet another cheap new math joke!***Snis Pilbor (09/03/04)***Volume of an ellipsoid cut by a hyperplane***Pannagadatta (09/03/04)***Normal convergency***azilla (09/03/04)***attn. Ms. Ore: new forgerys of A.P. name, again in March 2004 and now Sept 2004***Archimedes Plutonium (09/03/04)***Question on Index theory in Banach spaces***Alan (09/03/04)***Hal Puthoff & Jack Sarfatti on Dark Energy and Zero Point Energy***Jack Sarfatti (09/03/04)***If we did not use "Names" what Math/Language would we have***Zim Olson (09/03/04)***Re: Proof the irrationality of pi***Bob Silverman (09/03/04)***Trigonometric equations***Lars Nielsen (09/03/04)***Re: proof of twin primes conjecture***Alex Hunsley (09/03/04)***Re: Distance between PRIME numbers***Alex Hunsley (09/03/04)***Re: Problem in Geometry (URGENT!)***Alex Hunsley (09/03/04)***Probability of flipping a coin in Space or anywhere not Flat!***Zim Olson (09/03/04)***Re: solving a number pattern***Franz Vrabec (09/03/04)***please help***math boy (09/03/04)***What is the limit of this sequence?***amineh farzannia (09/03/04)***Permutations/Combinations Problem***icewhain (09/03/04)***Point in a Triangle***John Smith (09/03/04)***Point in a Triangle***John Smith (09/03/04)***Point in a Triangle***John Smith (09/03/04)***The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***Van Jacques (09/03/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***Van Jacques (09/03/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***William Elliot (09/04/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***William Elliot (09/05/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***Van Jacques (09/05/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***Van Jacques (09/05/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***Van Jacques (09/05/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***William Elliot (09/05/04)***Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***Van Jacques (09/05/04)***The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***William Elliot (09/06/04)*

**Re: The multiplicative groups Z*_n; One more time...***William Elliot (09/03/04)*

**reduced system of residues***mina_world (09/03/04)***Simulated Annealing***Bert (09/03/04)***Re: Four Color Theorem***N. Silver (09/03/04)***Legendre's Function of the Second Kind***Professor Gauss (09/03/04)***grammar: "inequality holding strictly if"***Daniel Sadoc (09/03/04)***Re: grammar: "inequality holding strictly if"***Bill (09/03/04)***Re: grammar: "inequality holding strictly if"***Daniel W. Johnson (09/03/04)***Re: grammar: "inequality holding strictly if"***Robert Israel (09/03/04)***Re: grammar: "inequality holding strictly if"***William Elliot (09/03/04)***Re: grammar: "inequality holding strictly if"***Jaap (09/03/04)***Re: grammar: "inequality holding strictly if"***Erland Gadde (09/03/04)*

**Math is EVIL; the DEVIL created it ! ! !***Harlan Osier (09/03/04)***Re: Math is EVIL; the DEVIL created it ! ! !***Clear Screen (09/03/04)***Re: Math is EVIL; the DEVIL created it ! ! !***David Moran (09/03/04)***Re: Math is EVIL; the DEVIL created it ! ! !***Phil Holman (09/03/04)***Re: Math is EVIL; the DEVIL created it ! ! !***Virgil (09/03/04)***Re: Math is EVIL; the DEVIL created it ! ! !***Joseph Nebus (09/03/04)***Re: Math is EVIL; the DEVIL created it ! ! !***Daniel Ryan (09/03/04)*

**complex number supremum***evil_iguana (09/03/04)***randomness of a series of numbers***Ryan H. (09/03/04)***packing circles in a square***Joe (09/02/04)***Re: Trace of Frobenius Endomorphism***Trav (09/02/04)***packing spheres inside a cube***Joe (09/02/04)***Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***Paul Burridge (09/02/04)***Re: Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***Daniel W. Johnson (09/03/04)***Re: Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***C. Bond (09/03/04)***Re: Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***Paul Burridge (09/03/04)***Re: Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***Dik T. Winter (09/03/04)***Re: Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***Paul Burridge (09/04/04)***Re: Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***Randy Poe (09/06/04)***Re: Is "mod" an arithmetic abbreviation for something?***Paul Burridge (09/06/04)*

**Determinant maximization problem under trace constraint***Tlet (09/02/04)***A simpler proof of Fermat's Last Theorem possibly discovered***Joe Kauzlarich (09/02/04)***Re: A simpler proof of Fermat's Last Theorem possibly discovered***Dik T. Winter (09/03/04)***Re: A simpler proof of Fermat's Last Theorem possibly discovered***A N Niel (09/03/04)***E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles proof!***jcfdillon (09/09/04)***Re: E.E.E. also claims he disproved or neutralized Wiles pro***jcfdillon (09/19/04)***re:A simpler proof of Fermat's Last Theorem possibly discovered***jcfdillon (09/19/04)***Paper correction online***jcfdillon (09/23/04)***"to" or "from" ok?***jcfdillon (09/29/04)***different from***jcfdillon (09/29/04)*

**Re: Basic Algebra***Bill Dubuque (09/02/04)***Shirley Marie Tourand - June 22nd 1960***Dar K. (09/02/04)***regular expression standard?***Matt (09/02/04)***Re: Why to call it pseudorandom?***Herman Rubin (09/02/04)***Nomenclature query (linear algebra)***Arturo Magidin (09/02/04)***Hilbert's enquiry***Narasimham G.L. (09/02/04)***complete space***Tomasz Koziara (09/02/04)***6 on 6, 3 games Question***Joseph Paturbo (09/02/04)***Re: classifying degenerate critical points***Monkey Saddle (09/02/04)***Yet Another Coprimality-Based Number-triangle***Leroy Quet (09/02/04)***Help on idle volume problem***Scott Forschler (09/02/04)***Conway and universal constructor***blip (09/02/04)***Need an Applied Math Journal***John Schutkeker (09/02/04)***Existence proofs for an Infinite Fraction***Aaron Isotton (09/02/04)***The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Paul (09/02/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Denis Feldmann (09/02/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***José Carlos Santos (09/02/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Lynn Kurtz (09/02/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Paul Pollack (09/02/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Bob Silverman (09/02/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Dave Rusin (09/02/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Virgil (09/03/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Carl Parkes (09/03/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Thomas Heye (09/03/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Rainer Rosenthal (09/04/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Phil Carmody (09/04/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Phil Carmody (09/04/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Rainer Rosenthal (09/04/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Phil Carmody (09/04/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Rainer Rosenthal (09/06/04)***Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Rainer Rosenthal (09/07/04)*

**Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?***Paul (09/04/04)***product of 5 consecutives integers cannot be square***newman (09/20/04)*

**Second Call for Papers - RelMiCS8***Michael Winter (09/02/04)***On Fashion, Faith and Fantasy (Roger Penrose)***Jack Sarfatti (09/02/04)***"All or None" DAGs and DAGs whose TranClos's are dim2 posets***David Halitsky (09/02/04)***matrix norms***taqai (09/02/04)***average distance between points....***David Bandel (09/02/04)***Re: intersection***Yogi (09/02/04)***help with total differential***massi (09/02/04)***formal power series rings and its quotient field***Prasanna (09/02/04)***Re: formal power series rings and its quotient field***Robin Chapman (09/02/04)***Re: formal power series rings and its quotient field***Jyrki Lahtonen (09/02/04)***Re: formal power series rings and its quotient field***slothropuk_at_hotmail.com (09/02/04)***Re: formal power series rings and its quotient field***Hagen (09/03/04)*

**Radio program about pi***The Last Danish Pastry (09/02/04)***pub question, driving me up the wall***Mark Robinson (09/02/04)***Surface Parametrization***Cristian Tota (09/02/04)***Pauli Excl Principle inverse of 2nd Law Thermodynamics and Heisenberg Uncertainty P. inverse of Fusion Barrier Principle***Archimedes Plutonium (09/02/04)***abstract algebra ..unity***mina_world (09/02/04)***Statistical prob***NoOne (09/02/04)***order types***Nicolas Ojeda Baer (09/02/04)***Simple groups***Isaac (09/02/04)***Probability(X is Prime)***david cornwell (09/02/04)***Re: Probability(X is Prime)***Bob Silverman (09/02/04)***Re: Probability(X is Prime)***Bob Silverman (09/07/04)***Re: Probability(X is Prime)***Bob Silverman (09/07/04)***Re: Probability(X is Prime)***david cornwell (09/08/04)***Re: Probability(X is Prime)***Bob Silverman (09/08/04)***Re: Probability(X is Prime)***Bob Silverman (09/09/04)***Re: Probability(X is Prime)***Bob Silverman (09/10/04)*

**Nonlinear equation***Deep K. Deb (09/01/04)***Do I smell funny?***Amanita, Love Ewe (09/01/04)***Combinatorial Problem***moreira (09/01/04)***roots of determinant of toeplitz-like matrix***dejfson (09/01/04)***Re: Binary math?***Norleif Slettebø (09/01/04)***Questions about delta rings***Agapito Martinez (09/01/04)***Re: How to Do Proofs and Learn Math***maky m. (09/01/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/01/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Daniel W. Johnson (09/02/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David McAnally (09/03/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/06/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Virgil (09/06/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/06/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Daniel W. Johnson (09/06/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Norm Dresner (09/06/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Daniel W. Johnson (09/06/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Norm Dresner (09/07/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Robin Chapman (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Robin Chapman (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Daniel W. Johnson (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Robin Chapman (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Daniel W. Johnson (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Virgil (09/07/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Daniel W. Johnson (09/07/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Daniel W. Johnson (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Virgil (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Randy Poe (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Virgil (09/07/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David P. Ferguson (09/23/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David McAnally (09/24/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***David McAnally (09/25/04)***Re: Cantor's proof that #(Evens) = #(Naturals) is inconsistent***Robin Chapman (09/08/04)*

**Re: A. SR-cult fraud and corruption***Mike (09/01/04)***John Edmund Milburn - May 7th 1975***Dar K. (09/01/04)***"AND"ing and "OR"ing two PRBS***Shekhar Thakurdesai (09/01/04)***Re: An observation on Fibonacci sequence->forward [number theory] egroup***Roger L. Bagula (09/01/04)***odd numbers which are least-deficient = almost-perfect***mark griffith (09/01/04)***exp(sqrt(2))***Thomas Mautsch (09/01/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***David McAnally (09/01/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***Thomas Mautsch (09/01/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***Barnaby Finch (09/01/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***Denis Feldmann (09/01/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***David McAnally (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***Denis Feldmann (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***David McAnally (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***David McAnally (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***Daniel W. Johnson (09/01/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***David McAnally (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***Daniel W. Johnson (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***David McAnally (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***David McAnally (09/02/04)***Re: exp(sqrt(2))***G. A. Edgar (09/02/04)*

**Not so easy optimisation problem for triangles***Thomas Mautsch (09/01/04)***Re: Not so easy optimisation problem for triangles***Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro (09/01/04)***Re: Not so easy optimisation problem for triangles***Bob Silverman (09/02/04)***Re: Not so easy optimisation problem for triangles***Bob Silverman (09/02/04)***Re: Not so easy optimisation problem for triangles***Bob Silverman (09/02/04)***Re: Not so easy optimisation problem for triangles***Bob Silverman (09/03/04)*

**f'=0 a.e => f constant ?***Julien Santini (09/01/04)***Tensor Products over Finite Fields (Galois Field)***Ng Khai Sheng (09/01/04)***Re: A fair election by lot***Axel Harvey (09/01/04)***Re: how to prove that f^2+f ' ^2 <=1 if ...***Thomas Mautsch (09/01/04)***Re: Fractional Integral Equation***Alain verghote (09/01/04)***algebra***Dominique (09/01/04)***Eigenfunctions of the Laplacian***Tobias Naehring (09/01/04)***Re: how to combine two fuzzy numbers***Manolis Wallace (09/01/04)***Re: 640,000,000,000 TO 1***Greg (09/01/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/01/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Matt Grime (09/01/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/01/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/02/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Matt Grime (09/02/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/07/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Matt Grime (09/07/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Randy Poe (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***matt grime (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/15/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/02/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/03/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/12/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/13/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/18/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/18/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/20/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/20/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/22/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/22/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/23/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/23/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/25/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/25/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/26/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/27/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***KRamsay (09/16/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/18/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/18/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/20/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/20/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/22/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/22/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/23/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/23/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/25/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/25/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/26/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/26/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/28/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/28/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/30/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Dave Seaman (09/30/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/28/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/30/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/23/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Matt Grime (09/18/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/20/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Matt Grime (09/20/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/22/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Matt Grime (09/22/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/23/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/07/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Matt Grime (09/07/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Robin Chapman (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/12/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/09/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/12/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/13/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Randy Poe (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Nathan (09/13/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***KRamsay (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/15/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***KRamsay (09/16/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Nathan (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/15/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Nathan (09/15/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/16/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Will Twentyman (09/16/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Nathan (09/16/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***KRamsay (09/17/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/18/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***KRamsay (09/25/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Keith Ramsay (09/27/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Virgil (09/27/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Andrew Usher (09/30/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Ford Prefect (09/24/04)*

**Re: The real numbers, and general comments***anon (09/07/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Ross A. Finlayson (09/12/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***John Spevacek (09/14/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***Ross A. Finlayson (09/16/04)***Re: The real numbers, and general comments***GEIvey (09/20/04)*

**Isomorphism between (Z_2^k)^* and Z_2 x Z_2^(k-2)***William Elliot (09/01/04)***parabola - conic section***NKProductionZ (09/01/04)***diophantine equation -- now rational***NKProductionZ (09/01/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***David McAnally (09/01/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***David McAnally (09/01/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***David McAnally (09/01/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/01/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Herman Jurjus (09/01/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/07/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Herman Jurjus (09/07/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/09/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Herman Jurjus (09/09/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/12/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Nath Rao (09/12/04)*

**Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/01/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***David McAnally (09/02/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/03/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***KRamsay (09/07/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/08/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***KRamsay (09/08/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/08/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***KRamsay (09/08/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Gerry Myerson (09/09/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/09/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Robin Chapman (09/09/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/12/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/12/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Eray Ozkural exa (09/13/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Herman Jurjus (09/14/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Torkel Franzen (09/14/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Herman Jurjus (09/15/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***KRamsay (09/19/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Andrew Usher (09/14/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Nath Rao (09/09/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Ross A. Finlayson (09/09/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Jesse F. Hughes (09/09/04)*

**Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***KRamsay (09/04/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***David McAnally (09/04/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***KRamsay (09/07/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***KRamsay (09/07/04)***Re: Uncountable sets in CZF?***Acid Pooh (09/14/04)*

**Cofinal Totally Ordered Subsets of Directed Posets***stef (09/01/04)***Re: Serge Lang's Political Activism Masterpiece "RATS IN A BOX" from Vietnam Era***Joseph Hertzlinger (09/01/04)***Re: Set theory question ....***Raquel (09/01/04)***Characterizations of Borel Sets***Acid Pooh (09/01/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Answer to the above three***Daniel Ryan (09/01/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Answer to the above three***Saint Cad (09/01/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Answer to the above three***Mensanator (09/01/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Answer to the above three***Jesse F. Hughes (09/01/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Answer to the above three***Wayne Brown (09/01/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/02/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Jesse F. Hughes (09/02/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Jesse F. Hughes (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Jesse F. Hughes (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Mensanator (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Steven E Landsburg (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Mensanator (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Richard Henry (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Mensanator (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/05/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Mensanator (09/05/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Dik T. Winter (09/06/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Mensanator (09/06/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/06/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/08/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Jesse F. Hughes (09/08/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/08/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Dik T. Winter (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***mensanator_at_aol.com (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***N. Silver (09/03/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Porky Pig Jr (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***N. Silver (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Mensanator (09/04/04)***Re: JSH: Assocation - Next answer***Daniel Ryan (09/04/04)*

**?Direct Proof of irrationality of sqrt(2)?***Bobby (09/01/04)***Re: ?Direct Proof of irrationality of sqrt(2)?***Torkel Franzen (09/01/04)***Re: ?Direct Proof of irrationality of sqrt(2)?***G. A. Edgar (09/01/04)***Re: ?Direct Proof of irrationality of sqrt(2)?***Bob Silverman (09/01/04)***Re: ?Direct Proof of irrationality of sqrt(2)?***Todd Trimble (09/01/04)***Re: ?Direct Proof of irrationality of sqrt(2)?***Todd Trimble (09/01/04)*

**Radius of convergence***Isaac (09/01/04)***How To Do Proofs and Learn Math***John G. (08/31/04)***Re: new math joke***Angus Rodgers (08/31/04)***Modulo summation***John Schoenfeld (08/31/04)***Info about a particular permutation distance***Joaqu?n M? L?pez Mu?oz (08/31/04)***Casimir's Greatest Blunder?***Jack Sarfatti (08/31/04)***Re: Prime Number Theorem***Barnaby Finch (08/31/04)***integral of a function that vanishes u-almost everywhere***Artur (08/31/04)***Re: integral of a function that vanishes u-almost everywhere***Stephen J. Herschkorn (08/31/04)***Re: integral of a function that vanishes u-almost everywhere (more)***Stephen J. Herschkorn (08/31/04)***Re: integral of a function that vanishes u-almost everywhere***Julien Santini (09/01/04)***Re: integral of a function that vanishes u-almost everywhere***David C. Ullrich (09/01/04)*

**Re: A multi-variable integration challenge***Scott Forschler (08/31/04)***Re: A Meta Packing Problem***Joe (08/31/04)***Another Number-Triangle Based On Coprimality***Leroy Quet (08/31/04)***Method to prove the matrix is irreducible?***papu (08/31/04)***Triangle: Adjacent Integers Are Coprime***Leroy Quet (08/31/04)***Re: Easy Convolution Sum Recursion Puzzle***Leroy Quet (08/31/04)***Re: Limit Of Mystery***Leroy Quet (08/31/04)***math &stream of payments exercise***haricot (08/31/04)***exercise about streams of payments***haricot (08/31/04)***Maths & finance exercise about forward contrat***haricot (08/31/04)***Re: Laplace transform of u(t)v(t)***Robert Israel (08/31/04)***Re: notation resources***Randy Poe (08/31/04)***Re: Nonlinear ODE***Robert Israel (08/31/04)***Re: Binary degrees?***Michael Stemper (08/31/04)***Barrie Glen MacGregor - October 13th 1941***Dar K. (08/31/04)***Integral identity***Leopold (08/31/04)***Particular case of a generalized Borsuk-Ulam theorem***Michael (08/31/04)***Sum of exp(-n^2) , n=0..N , N a positive integer.***papu (08/31/04)***Re: Are there any free lectures online?***Sylvain Croussette (08/31/04)***Re: What is the expert opinion on deriving SR with a Shubertian clock?***Perfectly Innocent (08/31/04)***Fourier transform, monoticity and positivity***Julien Toulouse (08/31/04)***uniform random rotations in n-dimensions***Sarah (08/31/04)***Re: uniform random rotations in n-dimensions***Jyrki Lahtonen (08/31/04)***Re: uniform random rotations in n-dimensions***Dave Seaman (08/31/04)***Re: uniform random rotations in n-dimensions***Dave Langers (08/31/04)***Re: uniform random rotations in n-dimensions***Sarah (08/31/04)***Re: uniform random rotations in n-dimensions***Herman Rubin (09/03/04)*

**Re: imple group of order 168***shiggy (08/31/04)***Re: Barrie Glen MacGregor - October 13th 1941***Enory Nolan (08/31/04)***Grid puzzle***The Last Danish Pastry (08/31/04)***Solution to some of Hilberts problems***Jose Capco (08/31/04)***Nondegenerate Quadratic Forms***Jose Capco (08/31/04)***Re: inversing h(x ,y) = f(x ,y) - f(x ,o) - f(o, y)***Alain Verghote (08/31/04)***Re: Could someone help me with this math problem ??***linda (08/31/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***David C. Ullrich (08/31/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***David C. Ullrich (08/31/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***William Hughes (08/31/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/08/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Daniel Ryan (09/09/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/09/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/09/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Daniel Ryan (09/09/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/09/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/09/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Paul Murray (09/09/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/10/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Paul Murray (09/10/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Paul Murray (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Saint Cad (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Dik T. Winter (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Paul Murray (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Paul Murray (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Brian Quincy Hutchings (09/12/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Timothy Murphy (09/10/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Porky Pig Jr (09/13/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***C. Bond (09/10/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/10/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Michael Lockhart (09/10/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***C. Bond (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Saint Cad (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***James Harris (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Jesse F. Hughes (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Paul Murray (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***W. Dale Hall (09/10/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Arturo Magidin (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***C. Bond (09/09/04)*

**Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***Roman B. Binder (09/11/04)***Re: Amateur takes on Wiles's work***John R Ramsden (09/19/04)*

**Re: Rectifiable paths and equivalence help?***David C. Ullrich (08/31/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (08/31/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (08/31/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Van Jacques (08/31/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Igor (08/31/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/01/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Igor (09/01/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Gregory L. Hansen (09/01/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Igor (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Gregory L. Hansen (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/06/04)*

**Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***suzysewnshow (09/01/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/01/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***suzysewnshow (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***suzysewnshow (09/03/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/03/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/02/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/03/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/06/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/06/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/06/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/07/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/07/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/08/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/08/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Ken S. Tucker (09/11/04)***Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***Alex Green (09/12/04)*

**Re: Metric Tensor of Flat Space-Time***puppet_sock_at_hotmail.com (09/01/04)*

**Re: Status of Waring-problem***Gottfried Helms (08/31/04)***Re: Explaining the foundations of math***William Elliot (08/31/04)*