Re: exp(sqrt(2))
From: Daniel W. Johnson (panoptes_at_iquest.net)
Date: 09/02/04
- Next message: Paul Pollack: "Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?"
- Previous message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- In reply to: David McAnally: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- Next in thread: David McAnally: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- Reply: David McAnally: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:14:02 -0500
David McAnally <D.McAnally@i'm_a_gnu.uq.net.au> wrote:
> While this theorem is sufficient to demonstrate that if x is a nonzero
> algebraic number, then exp(x) is transcendental, another theorem that is
> also sufficient to draw the conclusion is the Hermite-Lindemann Theorem,
> quoted in
>
> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Hermite-LindemannTheorem.html
I found both theorems, and I suppose I made the wrong decision about
which one to cite.
-- Daniel W. Johnson panoptes@iquest.net http://members.iquest.net/~panoptes/ 039 53 36 N / 086 11 55 W
- Next message: Paul Pollack: "Re: The product of consecutive integers is never a square ?"
- Previous message: G. A. Edgar: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- In reply to: David McAnally: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- Next in thread: David McAnally: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- Reply: David McAnally: "Re: exp(sqrt(2))"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|