Re: Explaining the foundations of math
From: Herman Rubin (hrubin_at_odds.stat.purdue.edu)
Date: 09/02/04
- Next message: Herman Rubin: "Re: A fair election by lot"
- Previous message: Herman Rubin: "Re: Why to call it pseudorandom?"
- Maybe in reply to: William Elliot: "Re: Explaining the foundations of math"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: Explaining the foundations of math"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Sep 2004 15:26:11 -0500
In article <HJ-dnbHONKpMc63cRVn-rA@comcast.com>,
Jon Miller <jonmillere1@comcast.net> wrote:
>"The World Wide Wade" <waderameyxiii@comcast.remove13.net> wrote in message
>news:waderameyxiii-8553A7.10570028082004@news.supernews.com...
>> In article <cgofbn$tos@odak26.prod.google.com>,
>> "Van Jacques" <calccurve-test23@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > For example, Weierstrass's main lasting contribution to math
>> > was to define the limit of f(x) at x_o as follows:
>> Hardly.
>Hey, don't confuse me with facts, my mind is made up.
The key step in "epsilontics" was taken by Bolzano in
1817, and amplified by Cauchy in 1820. As for limit,
Archimedes and Euclid, and other Greeks, had the concept
even if they could not produce a formal definition, not
having the terminology of many variables, and not even
having one variable before Diophantus.
-- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
- Next message: Herman Rubin: "Re: A fair election by lot"
- Previous message: Herman Rubin: "Re: Why to call it pseudorandom?"
- Maybe in reply to: William Elliot: "Re: Explaining the foundations of math"
- Next in thread: Herman Rubin: "Re: Explaining the foundations of math"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|