Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism
From: George Hammond (research137_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/06/04
- Next message: Chergarj: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Maybe in reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Next in thread: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Reply: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Reply:(deleted message) sam ende: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 04:27:51 -0400
"Russell E. Rierson" <analog57@yahoo.com> wrote
in message news:c410ffa5.0409052337.4a83c039@posting.google.com...
> Reality is perceptual:
>
> Studies of black hole physics by people like Hawking and Bekenstein
> suggests that our perceptual universe, which is perceived to have
> three spatial dimensions, might instead be "written" on a
> two-dimensional surface, analogously to a computer generated
> holographic projection. The everyday perceptions of our world as
> three-dimensional could be a type of optical delusion of our
> consciousness, or merely one of two alternative ways of describing
> reality.
<snip 300 lines of speculative physics with no practical application>
[Hammond]
A little bit of knowledge is dangerous, and that's what you have.
The danger is that you can't see the forrest for the trees.
You keep lecturing us in 300 line posts about the trees,
when everybody else is talking about the forrest.
Hammond has discovered, proven and published the fact that
the classical "person-God" of Religion exists and is explained
by CLASSICAL EINSTEINIAN GRAVITY.
Of course this means that when quantum gravity is discovered
we will get a quantum gravity explanation of God.
However, just like Newtionian Gravity will never become outdated,
the classical "person-God" will never be superceeded or outdated
by anything else, and is here to stay forever.
Therefore, your 300 line speculation on the explanation of the
"quantum gravity" basis of God is not only 100 years
premature, entirely speculative, but it is irrelevant in view of the fact
that an ACTUAL PROOF of the "classical person-god" has been
discovered and is on the table before us.
I suggest, that as a Mensa member, you apply your intelligence
to something practical, like defending Hammond.
====================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================
- Next message: Chergarj: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Previous message: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Maybe in reply to: George Hammond: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Next in thread: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Reply: Russell E. Rierson: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Reply:(deleted message) sam ende: "Re: God=G_uv explains Anti-Relativism"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|