Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset
From: Keith Ramsay (kramsay_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: Emir Palandi: "Permutation with repetition algorithm needed"
- Previous message: Chan-Ho Suh: "Re: Poincare's conjecture solved?"
- In reply to: r.e.s.: "Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Sep 2004 17:57:41 -0700
"r.e.s." <r.s@ZZmindspring.com> wrote in message news:<CXm%c.9716$w%6.9034@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>...
| "Daryl McCullough" <daryl@atc-nycorp.com> wrote ...
| > Is there an easy example of an infinite set of naturals that has no
| > infinite
| > r.e. subset? It would be better if it were co-r.e., but any example would
| > be nice. Thanks.
|
| The set of indices of the TMs that do not halt on a blank tape?
No, there are lots of infinite r.e. subsets of that. That's known
as a complete co-r.e. set and they always do. For example, take the
machines that have no transitions to the halt state, or ones that
always move to the right and output 1s, and so on.
What Daryl wants is known as an immune set. If it's the complement
of an r.e. set, then it's the complement of what's called a simple
set. Post proved there exists such a thing in 1944.
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/Courses/cs682/2004sp/Lectures/l37-post.pdf
Keith Ramsay
- Next message: Emir Palandi: "Permutation with repetition algorithm needed"
- Previous message: Chan-Ho Suh: "Re: Poincare's conjecture solved?"
- In reply to: r.e.s.: "Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset"
- Next in thread: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset"
- Reply: Daryl McCullough: "Re: Co-re set with no infinite r.e. subset"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|