Re: Probability(X is Prime)
From: david cornwell (davecornwell_at_comcast.net)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: Zork Adi: "Distribution of decimal digits"
- Previous message: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- In reply to: Bob Silverman: "Re: Probability(X is Prime)"
- Next in thread: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Probability(X is Prime)"
- Reply: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Probability(X is Prime)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Sep 2004 19:01:48 -0700
anonymous@mathforum.org (Bob Silverman) wrote in message news:<200409071320.i87DKkv13039@proapp.mathforum.org>...
> On 06 Sep 2004, david cornwell wrote:
> >pubkeybreaker@aol.comstuff (Bob Silverman) wrote in message news:<20040901213326.18867.00000009@mb-m01.aol.com>...
>
> <snip>
>
> Who is "we"?
Looks like "we" are the people writing to this thread.
<snip>
> You need to define a pdf before you can begin talking about
> probability. One such is the following:
>
> Let S = {x | (1-eps)X < x < (1+eps) X} x in Z+ for some X.
> and (say) 1/2 < eps < 1
>
> Thus, S is the set of all integers x, near X.
>
> If we select x uniformly at random from the set S, then the
> probability that x is prime is approximately 1/log(X).
>
> You can['t] take x uniformly from all of Z+; no such density function
> exists. You have to take some bounded subset of Z+.
So using your example as a good starting point for further discussion, what
values of eps and X make the statement not approximate but exact?
- Next message: Zork Adi: "Distribution of decimal digits"
- Previous message: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- In reply to: Bob Silverman: "Re: Probability(X is Prime)"
- Next in thread: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Probability(X is Prime)"
- Reply: Gerry Myerson: "Re: Probability(X is Prime)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|