Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin
From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: Nath Rao: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- In reply to: Jussi Piitulainen: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 15:16:53 +0200
Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> writes:
> Jesse F. Hughes writes:
>> Robin Chapman writes:
>>> No, you denied it; you did not refute it.
>>
>> Unfortunately for those of us with backgrounds in math and logic, a
>> common meaning of "refute" is a synonym for "deny".
> [...]
>> It's not a usage I like, but it's common enough to be in some
>> dictionaries. I don't know if it's just an Americanism.
>
> A modern British dictionary, Collins Cobuild, lists it. It marks both
> uses (disprove and deny) as "formal" but not limited to any region.
Thanks.
Two online dictionaries do not list this looser meaning. Both
Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) and WordNet give
definitions involving argument, evidence or proof, not mere assertion.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"Leaving things always seems to fix me,
Running seems to ease my worried mind."
-- Bad Livers, "Honey, I've Found a Brand New Way"
- Next message: Nath Rao: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- In reply to: Jussi Piitulainen: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- Next in thread: Robin Chapman: "Re: Raatikainen's critique of Chaitin"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|