Re: Are logarithms still useful?
From: Herman Rubin (hrubin_at_odds.stat.purdue.edu)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: Hero: "Re.complex 1"
- Previous message: alliville: "covering space"
- In reply to: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Reply: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 8 Sep 2004 11:35:12 -0500
In article <e4a0829b.0409071753.32791887@posting.google.com>,
ZZBunker <zzbunker@netscape.net> wrote:
>Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:<MPG.1ba6fec23c37eae198c95e@news.odyssey.net>...
>> "ZZBunker" <zzbunker@netscape.net> wrote in sci.math:
..................
> Since Physics existed since like before Zeno existed.
> You quite obviously mean that Newton, the
> Logic-challenged wanker, did not exist
> in 1614. And Napier invented logarithm *tables*.
> *Logarithms* were invented at the same time
> *division* of numbers were invented.
Considering that we have examples of division, with
remainder, farther back than 4000 BCE, this can
hardly be the case. The Greeks had tables of
trigonometric functions and used them; this could
not be the case without extensive division.
-- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University hrubin@stat.purdue.edu Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
- Next message: Hero: "Re.complex 1"
- Previous message: alliville: "covering space"
- In reply to: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Next in thread: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Reply: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|