Re: Prime counting connections
From: Christian Bau (christian.bau_at_cbau.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 09/09/04
- Next message: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers"
- Previous message: Christopher J. Henrich: "Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Prime counting connections"
- Next in thread: richard miller: "Re: Prime counting connections"
- Reply: richard miller: "Re: Prime counting connections"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 21:42:25 +0100
In article <3c65f87.0409090317.3d14dcd7@posting.google.com>,
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote:
> Several posters from sci.math have for quite some time claimed that
> Legendre's Formula is my prime counting function, but how could they
> convince anyone when they sound so different?
Mathematicians just look past the differences and see the similarities.
All those differences that are so important in your eyes just don't
exist to a mathematician.
Since you wasted several years on your ridiculous attempts to prove
Fermat's Last Theorem, some more years on some crazy idea that shattered
the foundation of mathematics, how many years of your life will you
waste on this?
- Next message: Michael Mendelsohn: "Re: TOTALLY OT: for the engineers"
- Previous message: Christopher J. Henrich: "Re: Arxiv paper supposedly gives roots of any polynomial?"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Prime counting connections"
- Next in thread: richard miller: "Re: Prime counting connections"
- Reply: richard miller: "Re: Prime counting connections"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
