Re: JSH: Math proofs
From: Jesse F. Hughes (jesse_at_phiwumbda.org)
Date: 09/12/04
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: Sphere Construction"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: Cyclic (Z_p^k)^*"
- In reply to: W. Dale Hall: "Re: JSH: Math proofs"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Math proofs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:01:31 +0200
"W. Dale Hall" <mailtowd-hall@pacbell.net> writes:
>> One thing that I haven't heard discussed is that my null test of
>> assuming the existence of a non-modular elliptic curve might eliminate
>> over 90% of Wiles's paper for consideration, or maybe more.
>>
>
> Golly, why wouldn't you have heard that?
> Because it's silly? Why "over 90%"? Why not claim it would
> turn a 100+ page article into a simplt 2-line proof?
*Two* line? Ha! It reduces it to a *single* line: the keystone step.
Don't underestimate the power of the NULL!
-- Jesse Hughes "She moaned, in pain and pleasure, as, in a confused whirlwind, she glimpsed an image of Saint Sebastian riddled with arrows, crucified and impaled." --Mario Vargas Llosa on category theory
- Next message: William Elliot: "Re: Sphere Construction"
- Previous message: William Elliot: "Re: Cyclic (Z_p^k)^*"
- In reply to: W. Dale Hall: "Re: JSH: Math proofs"
- Next in thread: James Harris: "Re: JSH: Math proofs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|