Re: Are logarithms still useful?
From: Joseph Hertzlinger (jcyclespersecondlongisland_at_nine.reticulatedcom.com)
Date: 09/13/04
- Next message: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Z and Baire Category Theorem"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?"
- In reply to: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 04:01:24 GMT
On 12 Sep 2004 19:05:34 -0700, ZZBunker <zzbunker@netscape.net> wrote:
> Joseph Hertzlinger
> <jcyclespersecondlongisland@nine.reticulatedcom.com> wrote in
> message
> news:<O801d.17783$az6.4618@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>...
>> I've wondered if ZZBunker is a bot, possibly Bloxy release 2.0.
>
> If I rememeber correctly was a Christian,
> and he would have given "science" and
> infinite set of chances with bots.
>
> But, unfortunately for the religious of faiths.
> those of us who are Robotically-unphased,
> issue no first, second, or third chances
> to any Robo-religions.
I take that to be a "yes."
-- http://hertzlinger.blogspot.com
- Next message: The World Wide Wade: "Re: Z and Baire Category Theorem"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?"
- In reply to: ZZBunker: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Next in thread: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Reply: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Are logarithms still useful?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|