Re: NP-hardness of k-means clustering
From: Stas Busygin (busygin_at_a-teleport.com)
Date: 09/14/04
- Next message: David W. Cantrell: "Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: matrix manipulation"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: NP-hardness of k-means clustering"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: NP-hardness of k-means clustering"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: NP-hardness of k-means clustering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 19:02:55 -0400
Hi Eray,
I checked the compendium first of all, and there are only two
clustering-related problems in Misc section:
http://www.nada.kth.se/~viggo/wwwcompendium/node126.html
Both of them are not about k-means.
Eray Ozkural exa wrote:
> busygin@a-teleport.com (Stas Busygin) wrote in message news:<8a5a72d7.0409071628.6be8cbf4@posting.google.com>...
>
>>Is there a published proof that the K-Centroid problem
>>is NP-hard?
>>
>>[K-Centroid Problem]
>>Given n points in R^m, find k other points in R^m
>>(centroids) such that the sum of distances from each
>>of the given points to its closest centroid is minimal.
>
>
> This seems to be the more general problem. Points in R^m is a special
> case.
>
> MINIMUM K-CENTER
> http://www.nada.kth.se/~viggo/wwwcompendium/node128.html
No, this is a different problem since it talks about "the
maximum distance" and the centers are given.
Best,
- Next message: David W. Cantrell: "Re: Solve/Approx: th / (1 - cos th) = c"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: matrix manipulation"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: NP-hardness of k-means clustering"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: NP-hardness of k-means clustering"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: NP-hardness of k-means clustering"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]