Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you

From: David Bandel (dwb1729_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/14/04 

Date: 14 Sep 2004 16:36:10 -0700

"Van Jacques" <calccurve-test23@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<ci1aks$rd5@odbk17.prod.google.com>...
> andy wrote:
> > Your little group of censorious little cretins flunked out in my
> > estimation. James has been intemperate and hot headed. What is NOT
> > missing is his heart and his basic sense of being a MAN, rather than
> a
> > spineless whelp like many of you who worship orthodoxy without
> > understanding it.
> >
> > I have had my disagreements with James on certain issues, but he is
> > more a MAN in the sense of what counts than any of you whelps. And
> > with that, I go back to my work.
> >
> > I despise you for picking on him . I LOATHE cowards, and that is what
> > most of you are.
>
> Yes. It takes a lot of courage to type nasty things on your keyboard,
> locked safely away in your house.
>
> > Your group flunked out in my estimation. While you are at it, grow
> > some balls if you can and attack some REAL basic problems in
> > mathematics, rather than act like censorious little cretins who only
> > know how to critique, rather than create something new.
> >
> > Andrew Beckwith, PhD
>
> There are a few people here who have at least tried to be of some
> help to people who come here with questions. I'm not clear on what
> you are doing here, except calling people names.
>
> I fear most of us will be forgotten completely in a couple hundred
> years or so. It would be nice to imagine that there is a Gauss or
> Galileo here, but I fear its not so, we just have to do our best
> with our meager gifts.

witten? hawking?

Relevant Pages