Bayes problem - error?
From: Kate Yoak (ikaterina_at_yoak.com)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Angus Rodgers: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?"
- Next in thread: phil: "Re: Bayes problem - error?"
- Maybe reply: phil: "Re: Bayes problem - error?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Sep 2004 00:24:22 -0700
I am working to solve a problem surrounding an application of the
bayes theorem. After many hours, I still cannot come up with the
correct solution. I wonder if there is something I am not seeing. I
have checked all the calculations very carefully with mathematica at
every step. The error has to lie somewhere with probability
manipulations, not plugging in the algebra.
This is a little long... Thank you in advance if you choose to take
the time to go through it.
Brief Problem Summary:
Regular blue eye/brown eye setup [blue: xx; heterozygote Xx or xX):
blue population= p^2.
heterozygote population=2p(1-p)
0<p<1
Assuming random mating, show that among brown-eyed children of
brown-eyed parents, the expected proportion of heterozygotes is
2p/(1+2p).
Solution:
The quantity we are trying to find is P(HC|BC,BP)
I use HC to mean Hetero Children, BC Brown Children, BP brown parents,
HP hetero parents, NHP non-hetero(but brown) parents, XX
Using the following corollary to bayes theorem:
P(A,B,C)=P(A|B,C)*P(B|C)*P(C) =>
P(A|B,C)=P(A|C)/P(B|C) *P(B|A,C)
We get P(HC|BC,BP)=P(BC|HC,BP)*P(HC|BP)/P(BC|BP)
P(BC|HC,BP)=1 (all hetero children are brown)
So P(HC|BC,BP)=P(HC|BP)/P(BC|BP)
To get the numerator:
P(HC|BP) is more completely expressed as P(HC|2BP) (two brown parents)
P(HC|2BP)=P(HC|2HP)*P(2HP|2BP)+P(HC|1HP,1NHP); (2NHP will produce no
HC)
P(HC|2HP)=P(HC|1HP,1NHP)=1/2
If you have Xx + Xx the probability of Xx is 1/2.
XX+Xx => same 1/2
P(2HP|2BP)=P(2HP,2BP)/P(2BP) (directly from bayes formula)
= P(2HP)/P(2BP)=hetero^2/brown^2 (population-wide proportion)
similarly
P(1HP,1NHP|2BP)=P(1HP,1NHP)/P(2BP)=(brown-hetero)*hetero/brown^2.
Going back to the numerator:
P(HC|2BP)=1/2*(hetero^2/brown^2+(brown-hetero)*hetero/brown^2)=
1/(2brown^2)*brown*hetero=hetero/(2brown)
The denominator can be simplified as follows:
P(BC|2BP)=1-P(bc|2BP) (bc=blue child)
= 1-P(bc|2HP)*P(2HP|2BP) (only 2 hetero parents can produce a blue
child)
= 1-1/4* hetero^2/brown^2 (from above)
= (4 brown^2-hetero^2) /4brown^2.
Putting it all together:
P(HC|BC,BP)=[hetero/(2brown)]/[(4 brown^2-hetero^2) /4brown^2]=
= [hetero * 2brown/(4 brown^2-hetero^2)
Plugging in: brown=1-p^2, hetero=2p(1-p)
= p(1+p)/(1+2p) (this I've checked with mathematica, and am certain.
Close.. but not quite!
- Next message: Angus Rodgers: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Previous message: Guy Macon: "Re: How long would it take a computer to completely "solve" chess?"
- Next in thread: phil: "Re: Bayes problem - error?"
- Maybe reply: phil: "Re: Bayes problem - error?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|