Re: A simple question about integers
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 09/15/04
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Previous message: Count Dracula: "Re: circular combinations"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Next in thread: anon: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:21:47 -0300
In <fa69ae35.0409140942.748e6f4f@posting.google.com>, on 09/14/2004
at 10:42 AM, erayo@bilkent.edu.tr (Eray Ozkural exa) said:
>I will suggest to you that a number that cannot be represented, even
>in principle, does not exist, even in principle.
That's nice, but it has nothing to do with what you quoted. He did
*not* write that a number could not be represented, just that the
representation was distinct from the number.
>If you can, please answer my question,
He already did. The fact that you didn't like his answer does not
diminish its validity.
>whether a real number can have infinitely many non-repeating binary
>digits in base 2, and no digits after the decimal point. By definition,
>no or yes?
No, by definition.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Previous message: Count Dracula: "Re: circular combinations"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Next in thread: anon: "Re: A simple question about integers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|