Re: I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you
From: gowan (gowan4_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/16/04
- Next message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Relation between skolem functions and axiom of choice"
- Previous message: JAL: "Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???"
- In reply to: andy: "I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 16 Sep 2004 12:28:59 -0700
rwill9955@hotmail.com (andy) wrote in message news:<7b4d50db.0409112014.7a96a86b@posting.google.com>...
> Your little group of censorious little cretins flunked out in my
> estimation. James has been intemperate and hot headed. What is NOT
> missing is his heart and his basic sense of being a MAN, rather than a
> spineless whelp like many of you who worship orthodoxy without
> understanding it.
>
> I have had my disagreements with James on certain issues, but he is
> more a MAN in the sense of what counts than any of you whelps. And
> with that, I go back to my work.
>
> I despise you for picking on him . I LOATHE cowards, and that is what
> most of you are.
>
> Your group flunked out in my estimation. While you are at it, grow
> some balls if you can and attack some REAL basic problems in
> mathematics, rather than act like censorious little cretins who only
> know how to critique, rather than create something new.
>
> Andrew Beckwith, PhD
Unfortunately JSH's work as posted on sci.math has been only too well
understood by several people on this newsgroup. It seems he himself
does not understand mathematics very well, though. As for you, "Dr."
Beckwith, you seem to place great stock in deserving respect because
you have a PhD. Many disreputable people have earned PhD degrees from
reputable universities, and there are plenty of diploma mills which
will grant any degree one wants if they are paid. Your posting above
is ample demonstration of your own character flaws.
- Next message: Torkel Franzen: "Re: Relation between skolem functions and axiom of choice"
- Previous message: JAL: "Set theory - VERY basic question: Why do we need elements when we have sets???"
- In reply to: andy: "I do not have any more time for you cowards, but James is more a man than any of you"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|