Re: Some math, algebraic integers
From: Nora Baron (norabaron_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/18/04
- Next message: Denis Feldmann: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Previous message: Denis Feldmann: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Some math, algebraic integers"
- Next in thread: David Bandel: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Sep 2004 06:40:52 -0700
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0409171539.1773e0d9@posting.google.com>...
> Luckily for me the math that explains my work is actually quite simple
> in many ways. All that is required is that you accept algebra. That
> might sound weird, but pay attention and you'll understand by the end.
>
> Now with rationals you can have a simple case like
>
> 2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 0
>
> where the roots are x=1/2 and x=-3, if I did my algebra correctly.
>
> Now notice you have an integer paired with a fraction, which, of
> course, is NOT an integer.
>
> Now consider some numbers q_1 and q_2, which I won't say a lot about
> now, though in a bit I'll put them in a particular ring, where you get
> a polynomial with
>
> x = q_1/2 and x=-3q_2 as the roots.
>
> That polynomial looks like
>
> 2x^2 + (6q_2 - q_1)x - 3q_1 q_2 = 0
>
> and let q_1 q_2 = 1, and 6q_2 - q_1 be an integer.
>
> It turns out that q_2 can't be an algebraic integer.
>
Let's see, you're saying q_1/2 and -3*q_2 are the roots of
2*x^2 + 5*x - 3.
Of course the roots are known. They are 1/2 and -3.
You just said that above.
Therefore q_1/2 = 1/2, or q_1 = 1.
And -3*q_2 = -3, so q_2 = 1.
Gee, those both look like algebraic integers to me.
Let's check the other conditions.
q_1*q_2 = 1 * 1 = 1.
Yes, that looks OK.
6*q_2 - q_1 = 6*1 - 1 = 5.
Yes, that is an integer, as you required.
What in the world were you thinking when you
said above
"It turns out that q_2 can't be an algebraic integer."
???
Nora B.
[snip]
- Next message: Denis Feldmann: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Previous message: Denis Feldmann: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Some math, algebraic integers"
- Next in thread: David Bandel: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|