Re: Some math, algebraic integers
From: Mensanator (mensanator_at_aol.compost)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Mensanator: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Previous message: Stan Brown: "Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?"
- In reply to: LarryLard: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Sep 2004 00:09:07 GMT
>Subject: Re: Some math, algebraic integers
>From: larrylard@hotmail.com (LarryLard)
>Date: 9/20/2004 6:09 AM Central Standard Time
>Message-id: <cd173062.0409200309.6f7c9d3@posting.google.com>
>
>jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message
>news:<3c65f87.0409180651.6fe5d5a9@posting.google.com>...
>[snippage]
>> Notice the complexity of W. Dale Hall's work above, as that complexity
>> is the hallmark of flawed thinking.
>
>Let's have that again!
>
>> complexity is the hallmark of flawed thinking.
>
>
>This... this transcends mere wackiness and enters into the realm of
>absurdity. "Complexity is the hallmark of flawed thinking". Fantastic.
>Incredible. James has truly outdone himself here.
Just as I thought. Wiles' proof is just a Rube Goldberg machine.
>
>--
>Larry Lard
>Replies to group please
>
-- Mensanator Ace of Clubs
- Next message: Mensanator: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Previous message: Stan Brown: "Re: 64 - is this the only number that is both a sq and a cube?"
- In reply to: LarryLard: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Some math, algebraic integers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]