Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Chan-Ho Suh: "Re: explain please the phi ratio"
- Previous message: nsgi_2004: "Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z"
- In reply to: Jani Yusef: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:21:45 -0300
In <d3be1825.0409200915.130b1e3f@posting.google.com>, on 09/20/2004
at 10:15 AM, jani@persian.com (Jani Yusef) said:
>That is exactly what I meant. What particular theorem holds this to
>be true?
No theorem; limits in real analysis are unique by definition.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Chan-Ho Suh: "Re: explain please the phi ratio"
- Previous message: nsgi_2004: "Re: set of all pos Z and neg Z"
- In reply to: Jani Yusef: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Reply: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
