Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1
From: Muttley (mrn1981_at_candern.com)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: translation"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: Maximal subgroups and powers of primes"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Next in thread: David Bandel: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Reply: David Bandel: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:15:34 GMT
On 20 Sep 2004 22:02:05 -0700, dwb1729@yahoo.com (David Bandel) wrote:
>why is .9999.... * 10 not equal to 9.9999....?
Your 'proof' is asinine, and I'm surprised Mr Ullrich or one of the others
hasn't said anything. I suppose when they see someone who is such a total idiot
as you, they realize they would be wasting their time.
As to your question above:
That isn't what your line 3 said.
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: translation"
- Previous message: Robert Israel: "Re: Maximal subgroups and powers of primes"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Next in thread: David Bandel: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Reply: David Bandel: "Re: Demonstrating that 0.999... = 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]