Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity
From: David C. Ullrich (ullrich_at_math.okstate.edu)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Harmonic Conjugate question"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:46:25 -0500
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:21:45 -0300, "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz"
<spamtrap@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:
>In <d3be1825.0409200915.130b1e3f@posting.google.com>, on 09/20/2004
> at 10:15 AM, jani@persian.com (Jani Yusef) said:
>
>>That is exactly what I meant. What particular theorem holds this to
>>be true?
>
>No theorem; limits in real analysis are unique by definition.
Uh, no. The definition of "lim_{x->infinity} f(x) = L" is that
for every eps > 0 there is N so that |f(x) - L| < eps for all
x > N. There's no reason a priori that this could not hold
for two different values of L; the fact that that's impossible
needs to be proved. (Yes, the proof is pretty easy. But it's
not just true by definition, it's a theorem in books. Honest.)
************************
David C. Ullrich
- Next message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: Harmonic Conjugate question"
- Previous message: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- In reply to: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Next in thread: David C. Ullrich: "Re: uniqueness of limits at infinity"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|