Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 09/21/04
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:41:53 -0300
In <39d6e584.0409210445.2f0d26d1@posting.google.com>, on 09/21/2004
at 05:45 AM, troubled6man@yahoo.com (J.E.) said:
>rather than adjust Einstein's equations to meet the large scale
>observations that we make to be consistent with the matter that we DO
>see.
Physicists have been doing that for decades. They simply haven't been
able to devise anything that works better than GR. The most promising
work right now is in an area that you probably don't like, because it
is absolutely ladden with unobservable phenomena.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Next in thread: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|