dependence of eigenfunction of Laplacian on domain
From: Tobias Naehring (naehring_at_iee.et.tu-dresden.de)
Date: 09/22/04
- Next message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Geert van der Wulp: "Re: I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!"
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: dependence of eigenfunction of Laplacian on domain"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: dependence of eigenfunction of Laplacian on domain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Sep 2004 16:27:04 +0200
% The real numbers
\def\IR{{\bf R}}\parindent0pt\parskip1ex
The pdf-version of this posting is available at
{\tt http://www.tn-home.de/Tobias/Mathe/040922.pdf}
In the following, I call an eigenfunction of the Laplacian $\Delta$ as
{\it main eigenfunction} if it corresponds to the eigenvalue with smallest
absolute value.
-- The question in rough words:
Is there a main eigenfunction of the two-dimensional
Laplacian which is continuously dependent on the domain?
-- The more precise question:
Let $G$ be some bounded domain of $\IR^2$ with smooth boundary and let
$\Phi_p:G\rightarrow G_p:=\Phi_p(G)$ be a family of diffeomorphisms
smoothly parameterised by $p\in(0,1)$. Thereby, each $G_p$ shall be
bounded.
Is there for each $p\in(0,1)$ a main eigenfunction $\phi_p$ of the
Laplacian $\Delta$ on $G_p$ such that the family
$(\phi_p)_{p\in(0,1)}$ is continuously parameterised by $p\in(0,1)$???
I would be thankful for any useful comment on this question.
With best regards,
Tobias N\"ahring
\bye
- Next message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Geert van der Wulp: "Re: I found a great FORMULA !!! pls check if corect !!!"
- Next in thread: Robert Israel: "Re: dependence of eigenfunction of Laplacian on domain"
- Reply: Robert Israel: "Re: dependence of eigenfunction of Laplacian on domain"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]