Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|
From: Robert Low (mtx014_at_linux.services.coventry.ac.uk)
Date: 09/23/04
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Periodicity of a^n mod c"
- Previous message: François Charton: "Re: Like a log"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Next in thread: LarryLard: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Sep 2004 08:20:57 GMT
Eray Ozkural exa <erayo@bilkent.edu.tr> wrote:
>Let's have an algorithm that starts with
>0.1 in binary, and constructs a tree in breadth-first fashion
>
> 0.1
> 0.01 0.11
>0.001 0.011....
>
>You get the idea... It's obvious that this tree has the same
>cardinality as Z, since this is a nonhalting algorithm (or since I can
>give an integer to every node, etc.) Now, I want to prove that such a
>subdivision procedure cannot generate all x in (0,1) in an intuitive
>way.
You only get terminating expansions from this algorithm, and most
of the numbers in (0,1) aren't of that form.
-- Rob. http://www.mis.coventry.ac.uk/~mtx014/
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Periodicity of a^n mod c"
- Previous message: François Charton: "Re: Like a log"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Next in thread: LarryLard: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|