Re: Some number theory
From: Brian Quincy Hutchings (QncyMI_at_netscape.net)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof""
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof""
- In reply to: Tim Mellor: "Re: Some number theory"
- Next in thread: Proginoskes: "Re: Some number theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Sep 2004 12:02:13 -0700
it's only "recreational" in a sad way.
your comments are just fine, and show that
it can be boiled-down to HSJ's handling of language;
there's just no arguing with him on these shifting grounds!
buyt, maybe, Evariste will rise from the dead to deal with it ...
or more likely to find a better girlfriend.
timm@amsta.leeds.ac.uk (Tim Mellor) wrote in message news:<e43616aa.0409240940.30eabbb1@posting.google.com>...
> > http://www.ne-plus-ultra.net/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=46&Itemid=26
> ." The first sentence within the main text reads "Determining the
> distrubution of factors within irrational algebraic integers has long
> been considered impossible as it is not possible to do using Galois
> Theory."
>
> I The first clause of the abstract has no verb.
> II What is meant be "distribution of factors"?
> III What is meant by "within a polynomial factorization"?
> IV What is meant be "factors within irrational algebraic integers"?
> V What is meant by "over interpretation of Galois Theory"?
> VI There should be a comma before "as" whithin the first sentance.
>
> In reference to II-V, even if these term are explained within your
> paper, it is in appropriate to use them without comment in the
> abstract. Furthermore, after breifly scanning the papers, I found no
> definitions at all.
-Trickier Dick Cheeny -- out of office, after gigayears!
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2004/040505missouri_testim.html
http://tarpley.net/bush12.htm
http://www.benfranklinbooks.com/
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac
http://www.wlym.com/pdf/iclc/howthenation.pdf
http://larouchepub.com/other/2003/3048iraq_58_const.html
http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate02.html
- Next message: Virgil: "Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof""
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: Another stupid Cantor's "proof""
- In reply to: Tim Mellor: "Re: Some number theory"
- Next in thread: Proginoskes: "Re: Some number theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|