Re: My real opinion about real numbers
From: Arturo Magidin (magidin_at_math.berkeley.edu)
Date: 09/25/04
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: JSH: Nora Baron"
- Previous message: Arturo Magidin: "Re: My real opinion about real numbers"
- In reply to: Keckman: "Re: My real opinion about real numbers"
- Next in thread: Gonçalo Rodrigues: "Re: My real opinion about real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:06:39 +0000 (UTC)
In article <opseuup2za3uk9lu@cs81133.pp.htv.fi>,
Keckman <keckman@welho.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 22:52:30 +0000 (UTC), Arturo Magidin
><magidin@math.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>> Again: your error is that the second list doesn't have "all numbers
>> not in the first list". You would need to show that this is possible
>> in the first place.
>
>It is very easy for me to do it possible in the first place, because you
>do it.
I'm sorry, but this little nonsequitur of yours is nonsense.
>You or anyother human being or computer come and tell me what numbers are
>not in first list.
Are you restricting yourself to the COMPUTABLE real numbers? If so,
Cantor's proof doesn't apply in the first place. Is this the source of
your errors and confusion? That you were thinking of one thing but
insist on saying something else?
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@math.berkeley.edu
- Next message: David Kastrup: "Re: JSH: Nora Baron"
- Previous message: Arturo Magidin: "Re: My real opinion about real numbers"
- In reply to: Keckman: "Re: My real opinion about real numbers"
- Next in thread: Gonçalo Rodrigues: "Re: My real opinion about real numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|