Re: My paper, and the cheaters
From: Peter Pan (RMoebs1_at_compuserve.de)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: RL Gerl: "Re: Cantor's "proof""
- Previous message: C. Bond: "Re: JSH: Key insight, algebra"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: My paper, and the cheaters"
- Next in thread: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: My paper, and the cheaters"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Sep 2004 17:10:47 -0700
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote
> RMoebs1@compuserve.de (Peter Pan) wrote in message news:<3cc72195.0409241750.14adef8f@posting.google.com>...
> > norabaron@hotmail.com (Nora Baron) wrote
> >
> > > This is not straight. This is not honest.
> >
> > Enough said. Now let's leave Mr. Harris alone and do some serious stuff...
> ... If they stop pushing their position, the fear is that eventually
> readers will understand what I'm saying, while by continuing to argue
> with me, they can keep a lot of the followers among you convinced that
> I must be wrong....
>
> People falsely conclude that if a LOT of other people are arguing with
> ONE individual then that individual must be wrong.
> James Harris
Mr. Harris, you are talking bull*** (first time I use that term in a
post in 15 years).
Socially, it's bull*** on a low level, and scientifically on an
(admittedly) high, but not too high level.
THERE WILL NO REACTION FROM ME TO ANY ANSWER TO THIS POST. THERE WILL
BE NO FURTHER POST FROM ME IN ANY THREAT CONTAINING 'James Harris'
Finis
- Next message: RL Gerl: "Re: Cantor's "proof""
- Previous message: C. Bond: "Re: JSH: Key insight, algebra"
- In reply to: James Harris: "Re: My paper, and the cheaters"
- Next in thread: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: My paper, and the cheaters"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]