Re: Cantors proof
From: Daryl McCullough (daryl_at_atc-nycorp.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Periodicity of a^n mod c"
- Previous message: Hero: "Re: French and German for the Mathematician"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Next in thread: Dave Seaman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Reply: Dave Seaman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 27 Sep 2004 12:45:18 -0700
Dave Seaman <dseaman@no.such.host> writes:
> Definition. A natural number is a transitive set that is well ordered by
> the set-membership relation and also by the inverse of the set-membership
> relation.
Yes, for *some* definitions of the terms "natural number" and "finite" it
is tautological that the natural numbers are finite. But for *other*
definitions, it is necessary to prove it.
-- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
- Next message: Doug Goncz : "Re: Periodicity of a^n mod c"
- Previous message: Hero: "Re: French and German for the Mathematician"
- In reply to: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Next in thread: Dave Seaman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Reply: Dave Seaman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]