Re: The real numbers, and general comments
From: Virgil (ITSnetNOTcom#virgil_at_COMCAST.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: i still haven't get it"
- In reply to: Keith Ramsay: "Re: The real numbers, and general comments"
- Next in thread: Andrew Usher: "Re: The real numbers, and general comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:31:49 -0600
In article <17a4a089.0409262304.17870632@posting.google.com>,
kramsay@aol.com (Keith Ramsay) wrote:
> Kleeneliness is next to Goedeliness?
Ouch!
- Next message: Will Twentyman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Previous message: Virgil: "Re: i still haven't get it"
- In reply to: Keith Ramsay: "Re: The real numbers, and general comments"
- Next in thread: Andrew Usher: "Re: The real numbers, and general comments"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
