Proof of code unique decipherability condition
From: Kevin Saff (google.com_at_kevin.saff.net)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: David Bandel: "Re: .9999... = 1"
- Previous message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:55:45 GMT
I'm working my way through Robert B. Ash's _Information_Theory_ (Dover, ISBN
0-486-66521-6) and I found his proof of the condition for a code's unique
decipherability, as he himself admits, "somewhat cumbersome". He suggests
there is a cleaner proof by Sardinas and Patterson using semigroups:
Sardinas, A.A. and G.W. Patterson (1950), A Necessary and Sufficient
Condition for Unique Decomposition of Coded Messages, /Research Division
Report/ 50-27, Moore School of Electrical Engineering, University of
Pennsylvania, Pa.
-or- (presumably an easier to find copy/revision)
Sardinas, A.A. and G.W. Patterson (1953), A Necessary and Sufficient
Condition for Unique Decomposition of Coded Messages, /IRE Convention
Record/ Part 8, 104-108.
I haven't tracked either down yet. Does anyone know a reference for a good
proof of this theorem?
The theorem states that a code is uniquely decipherable iff after definining
the sets S_n as follows, no S_n != S_0 contains a code word.
Let S_0 be the set of code words.
Let S_1 be all A s.t. VA = W, where V and W are code words (in S_0).
Let S_n be {all A s.t. there exists WA in S_n-1 so that W in S_0}
U {all A s.t. there exists B in S_n-1 so that BA is in S_0}
-- +---- Kevin C. Saff ----+ F-15 | |Eagle | Engineer in St. Louis | _____|_^_|_____ | Tracking/Fleet Support| * + [_(x)_] + *
- Next message: David Bandel: "Re: .9999... = 1"
- Previous message: stephen_at_nomail.com: "Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]