Re: need with my sons homework please
From: W. Dale Hall (mailtowd-hall_at_pacbell.net)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Previous message: Jonas Hei: "Re: Probability Distribution..."
- In reply to: W. Dale Hall: "Re: need with my sons homework please"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: need with my sons homework please"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:26:39 GMT
W. Dale Hall wrote:
> Everyone seems to realize that the function in
> the first problem is rendered ambiguously, and
> several people have offered their renditions of
> what that function ought to have been.
>
> The correct parsing of this
>
> e^h-1/h
>
> should be as follows
>
> (e^h - 1)/h
>
> I'm astonished that no one seems to have seen it,
> especially considering that many folks recognized
> the source as an introductory calculus class.
>
> Dale.
I guess I should have waited a bit for the responses
that did yield the above parsing to show up at my
server. A couple of people did, in fact, read the
problem this way. My bad.
Dale.
- Next message: Dave Seaman: "Re: Cantors proof"
- Previous message: Jonas Hei: "Re: Probability Distribution..."
- In reply to: W. Dale Hall: "Re: need with my sons homework please"
- Next in thread: robert j. kolker: "Re: need with my sons homework please"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]