Re: Cantors proof

From: Keckman (keckman_at_welho.com)
Date: 09/28/04 

Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:43:02 +0300

On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:17:11 +0000 (UTC), Dave Seaman
<dseaman@no.such.host> wrote:

> Which part of "not finite" do you not understand?
>

You seemingly do not understand the simplest consept of concept
construction logic.

If any, either or both of conceptions "not finite" or "finite" have any
rational meaning then both of them must be reasonable.

I think none of them has any reasonable meaning.

Just tautoligistict nagging that infinite=not-infinite and
not-infinite=infinete is nothing.

There is no such a thing as infinite -> we don't need that's concept's
antithesis either.