Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: TMG (TMG_at_Nowhere.org)
Date: 10/02/04 

Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:03:03 -0400

George Hammond wrote:

> "David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
> news:bn9ql09gbl528pe56c9h8lp71pb9esec2v@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:43:47 -0400, "George Hammond"
>><nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
>>
>
>
>>So, you are once again back to declaring yourself to be a career
>>criminal specialising in fraud. Are you still halucinating that this
>>enhances your credibility?
>
>
> [Hammond]
> Hey Nummynuts... where you been? Haven't heard from you for awhile,
> you haven't been stalking me lately....someone told me you died for
> chrissakes.
>
>
> [Hammond]
> I know one thing that enhances my credibility.... I've just discoverd that
> the SPoG confirms Bill Dembski's Intelligent Design theory... so that
> makes TWO OF US who now believe that a scientific proof of God
> exists and has been found. And Dembski's a real bigshot btw, his
> _Intelligent Design_ was published by Oxford University Press!
>
> Any way, get a load of this:
>
> [Hammond]
> First of all, Dembski is not an amateur. Furthermore he has attacked the
> problem of finding a "scientific proof of God" in his own original way by
> producing a new "scientific formulation" of the old idea of "Intelligent
> Design".
> The idea of "Intelligent Design" being the basis of a "SPoG" is as old as
> the
> hills, in fact Isaac Newton is famous for saying:
>
> "In lieu of all other evidence, I take the human thumb
> to be sufficient proof of God."
> (Isaac Newton)

What about all of the post Newton science?

> which clearly shows he believed in it.
> However, Dembski has come up with something new because he is a PhD
> mathematician and an expert in Statistics. The following review of his book
> _No Free Lunch_ (1999 I believe) was written by a reviewer and is posted on
> Amazon. I suggest you read it.... and then I will explain how Hammond's
> SPoG
> actually PROVES that Dembski's theory is CORRECT... a fact that I'm sure
> WmAD will take notice of:
>
>
> ------------------Amazon.com review of Dembski's _No Free
> Lunch_----------------
>
> 43 of 80 people found the following review helpful:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0742512975/ref=cm_rev_all_1/002-5540277-0312015?%5Fencoding=UTF8&me=ATVPDKIKX0DER

Better read that review you're posting Sparky, it clearly anti-Dembski.

Here's another page of reviews and papers indicating Dembski is a
sloppy, deceptive crank.

http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/science/creationism/dembski.html

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... > the SPoG confirms Bill Dembski's Intelligent Design theory... ... in fact Isaac Newton is famous for saying: ... Dembski has come up with something new because he is a PhD ... Better read that review you're posting Sparky, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >>are fractal in nature (like the bodies blood vessels and the passages ... in fact Isaac Newton is famous for saying: ... Dembski has come up with something new because he is a PhD ... Better read that review you're posting Sparky, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question about God=G_uv
    ... > hills, in fact Isaac Newton is famous for saying: ... Dembski has come up with something new because he is a PhD ... Better read that review you're posting Sparky, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Question about God=G_uv
    ... >>Did you include this all in your info to Dembski? ... in fact Isaac Newton is famous for saying: ... Better read that review you're posting Sparky, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... makes TWO OF US who now believe that a scientific proof of God ... _Intelligent Design_ was published by Oxford University Press! ... Dembski has come up with something new because he is a PhD ... An object exhibits specified complexity ...
    (sci.math)