Re: (.999999... == 1) = 1

From: Brian Quincy Hutchings (QncyMI_at_netscape.net)
Date: 10/02/04 

Date: 2 Oct 2004 14:59:04 -0700

I will tediously repeat, as a matter of notation,
it's really just the sole ambiguity of "decimals,"
which was adressed "formally" by Stevin in his pamphlett.
     and "Simon Stevin says" *is* a latinate pseudonym.

"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:<415e4b5d$0$20578$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>...
> If nothing else, these tedious threads about 0.99.. = 1 have illustrated one
> point - that this cannot be proved without a rigorous definition of what is
> a Real number, to allow us to formally prove that

-A HYDROGEN (sic; cracked methane) ECONOMY?...
The Three Phases of Exploitation of the Protocols
of the Elders of Kyoto:
(FOSSILISATION [McCainanites?] (TM/sic))/
BORE/GUSH/NADIR "@" http://www.tarpley.net/aobook.htm.
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm (partial contents, below):
17 -- THE ATTEMPTED COUP D'ETAT, 3/30/81 (87K)
18 -- IRAN-CONTRA (140K)
19 -- THE LEVERAGED BUYOUT MOB (67K)
20 -- THE PHONY WAR ON DRUGS (26K)
21 -- OMAHA (25K)
22 -- GEORGE "#9" TAKES THE PRESIDENCY (112K)
23 -- THE END OF HISTORY (168K)
24 -- THE NEW WORLD ORDER (255K)
25 -- THYROID STORM (139K)
http://quincy4board.homestead.com/files/curriculum/Cosmo.PCX

Relevant Pages