To the idiot Eric Gisse, who can't deliver even the simplest problem result

From: eleaticus (eleaticus_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 10/03/04


Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 00:09:00 -0500


"Eric Gisse" <fsegg@uaf.edu> wrote in message
news:fd0fc2fa.0410021951.763d6a5b@posting.google.com...
> "eleaticus" <eleaticus@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:<G9G7d.97476$as2.9409@bignews3.bellsouth.net>...
>
> [snip]
>
> > Well, I re-read your piece and regret my response but ...
>
> ...you will continue posting your tripe day in day out for years to come?

Prove by example that what I demonstrate in "A. SR-cult fraud and
corruption" isn't correct and I will stop posting it.

LOL LOL LOL

Here's a start: (x1-x0).

Just surround it with whatever and prefix with with *= where * is whatever
function name, then show how it isn't invariant with respect to the galilean
transformation.

In as much as it is 'tripe', should be no problem for a strictly non-tripe
person such as you.

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

When you are through with that one I'll make the same deal on others.

What a jackass you are! And a believer in magic. oh, yes, if you keep
saying there are equations in x,y,z,t in difference form that aren't
invariant under the galilean transformations then surely it must someday
become true.

LOL

Perhaps you should try 'abracadabra!'

LOL

Or maybe you are indeed the Captain Marvel you believe yourself to be and
'Shazam!' will work.

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

"What a maroon!"

eleaticus



Relevant Pages

  • To the idiot Eric Gisse, who cant deliver even the simplest problem result
    ... corruption" isn't correct and I will stop posting it. ... In as much as it is 'tripe', should be no problem for a strictly non-tripe ... LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL ... invariant under the galilean transformations then surely it must someday ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • To the idiot Eric Gisse, who cant deliver even the simplest problem result
    ... corruption" isn't correct and I will stop posting it. ... In as much as it is 'tripe', should be no problem for a strictly non-tripe ... LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL ... invariant under the galilean transformations then surely it must someday ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: OT: Business Week vs Gore
    ... 2pid either disappears or resorts to posting new OT ... material in an effort to deflect the thrashing ... lol Lol LoL lOl LOL! ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: OT: In the Battle against Snot
    ... Yes, 2pid, now bring your new BFF as a stupid justification for ... posting this. ... You are *so* transparent. ... lol Lol LoL lOl LOL! ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)