Re: number....
From: José Carlos Santos (jcsantos_at_fc.up.pt)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: mr0x: "Lp space question"
- Previous message: Nora Baron: "Re: My paper, and the cheaters"
- In reply to: mina_world: "number...."
- Next in thread: mina_world: "Re: number...."
- Reply: mina_world: "Re: number...."
- Reply: Bill Dubuque: "Re: number...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 17:37:01 +0100
mina_world wrote:
> show that
> 2^(2n + 1) = {9*(n^2)} - (3n) + 2 (mod 54)
> for all positive integer n.
Put f(n) = 2^(2n + 1) - 9n^2 + 3n - 2. You want to prove that 54
divides each f(n). Since this is clearly true when n = 1 (because
f(1) = 0), it's enough to prove that f(n + 1) - f(n) is always a
multiple of 54. But
f(n + 1) - f(n) = 6(4^n - 1 - 3n).
So, you have to prove that 4^n - 1 - 3n is always a multiple of 9,
which is quite easy (remember that 4 = 3 + 1).
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
- Next message: mr0x: "Lp space question"
- Previous message: Nora Baron: "Re: My paper, and the cheaters"
- In reply to: mina_world: "number...."
- Next in thread: mina_world: "Re: number...."
- Reply: mina_world: "Re: number...."
- Reply: Bill Dubuque: "Re: number...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|