Re: This Month's Thought on Fermat's Last Theorem: 1

From: Keckman (keckman_at_welho.com)
Date: 10/04/04 

Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:07:09 +0300

On 4 Oct 2004 07:42:01 -0700, Randy Poe <poespam-trap@yahoo.com> wrote:

> is simply wrong. You keep saying it, but it's not true.
> That's what you're trying to PROVE, and you "prove" it
> by saying it over and over.
>

Seems that you are still not assured about that what was the
main motive in this list i.e. i have to show that i have resolved
the Fermat's Last Theorem in maths today and show that
in math today there is oo in N because N is said to be infinite.

I have tried to prove the obvious thing many ways.

It is so obvious that i don't know how to prove it.

I have said you that if you take k number from Natural numbers
there must be at least one item which is bigness atleast k.

If you take something oo number from Naturals
there must be at least one item among them that's
bigness is oo.

I don't have to prove it. It is so obvious axiom for my self.

And i hope you are not in a jury to make a judgment.

Every natural number is different. Let's suppose we
have hole for every number and number for every hole.

If we have oo holes. There must be a number that is atleast oo.
Or if we have oo numbers there must be oo holes.

Now i think i'm doing about obvious thing too complicated.
That's not what proove is supposed to be. Of course i can
try to make it so long and complicated that it is easier
to accept it than disallow it.