Re: This Month's Thought on Fermat's Last Theorem: 1
From: Keckman (keckman_at_welho.com)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: rsm109_at_york.ac.uk: "Re: To the idiot Eric Gisse, who can't deliver even the simplest problem result"
- Previous message: ZHANG Yan: "Re: the difference between Laplace-Stieltjes transform and Laplace transform"
- In reply to: Will Twentyman: "Re: This Month's Thought on Fermat's Last Theorem: 1"
- Next in thread: Keckman: "Re: This Month's Thought on Fermat's Last Theorem: 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:39:01 +0300
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 07:50:21 -0400, Will Twentyman
<wtwentyman@read.my.sig> wrote:
> Keckman wrote:
>> 1+1+1+1+1+1+... = "infinite" and "finite" says math today
> No, the branches of math you are probably referring to say that queue is
> not made of finitely many operations, so not allowed.
>
Ok. Now i undertsand. That Will Twentyman is form USA. No reason to suppose
that he has a any deepgoing understanding of civilization (Greek,
Europeans great
phiosophers etc...)
Just marketing, Hollywood movies, entertainments and things like that...
-- Petri Keckman
- Next message: rsm109_at_york.ac.uk: "Re: To the idiot Eric Gisse, who can't deliver even the simplest problem result"
- Previous message: ZHANG Yan: "Re: the difference between Laplace-Stieltjes transform and Laplace transform"
- In reply to: Will Twentyman: "Re: This Month's Thought on Fermat's Last Theorem: 1"
- Next in thread: Keckman: "Re: This Month's Thought on Fermat's Last Theorem: 1"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
