Re: um.....this is...!
From: Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro (ilarrosaQUITARMAYUSCULAS_at_mundo-r.com)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Previous message: Rod: "Re: Velocity, part 2"
- In reply to: mina_world: "um.....this is...!"
- Next in thread: Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro: "Re: um.....this is...!"
- Reply: Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro: "Re: um.....this is...!"
- Reply: mina_world: "Re: um.....this is...!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 17:26:33 +0200
En el mensaje:cjudam$qor$1@news.hananet.net,
mina_world <mina_world@hanmail.net> escribió:
> hello.....doctor~
>
> a_1 = 1
>
> 2*{a_(n+1)} = 3*a_n + sqrt{(5(a_n)^2) + 4} (n >= 1)
>
> show that there does not exist n such that 1989 | a_(2n).
> (n is positive integer)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> um....it's so difficult to me.
>
> i need your advice.
>
> thank you very much for your advice.
Hint: Prove that a(n) = Fibonacci(2n)
-- Best regards, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro A Coruña (España) ilarrosaQUITARMAYUSCULAS@mundo-r.com
- Next message: Aatu Koskensilta: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Previous message: Rod: "Re: Velocity, part 2"
- In reply to: mina_world: "um.....this is...!"
- Next in thread: Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro: "Re: um.....this is...!"
- Reply: Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro: "Re: um.....this is...!"
- Reply: mina_world: "Re: um.....this is...!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
