Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

From: George Hammond (nowhere_at_nomailspam.com)
Date: 10/07/04 

Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 06:54:11 -0400

"David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
news:lsg7m0d1r0vbl0vg83dndpn24nos9ib12r@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 10:06:47 -0400, "George Hammond"
> <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
> >"David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
> >news:hd22m0998g58lfd0a3vtktltc43ifigsh3@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 03:49:41 -0400, "George Hammond"
> >> <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
> >> >"David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:jnsul050gmdt05atatdgmqehbu6rfk40qu@4ax.com...
> >> >> On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:41:33 -0400, "George Hammond"
> >> >> <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
> >> >> >"David Evens" <devens@technologist.com> wrote in message
> >> >> >news:bn9ql09gbl528pe56c9h8lp71pb9esec2v@4ax.com...
> >> >> >> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:43:47 -0400, "George Hammond"
> >> >> >> <nowhere@nomailspam.com> wrote:
> >
> ><large snip of inconvenient things>
> >
> >> >[Hammond]
> >> >I have a funny feeling you're wrong. One... Dembski is a serious and
> >> >qualified scientist... not a crackpot. Second, unlike any other
> >scientist
> >> >I have ever appealed to, he's got the same crowd of kooks attacking
> >> >him that I do. My guess is that if he scents "scientific truth" in
the
> >> >SPoG, which given his qulifications is likely, he is going to bother
to
> >> >dig to the bottom of it.
> >>
> >> You stated that he was a mathematician, and a statistician. The later
> >> can be generally ignored, because statistical theory has gotten most
> >> of its important advances from people in other disciplines who need
> >> some statistical mechanism that haasn't been developed yet so they
> >> went ahead and developed it. (Most frequently from biologists,
> >> actually.)
> >
> >[Hammond]
> >No... actually from psychologists.... for instance both Pearson
> >and fisher were working on the Statistical theory of Intelligence
> >Tests (IQ tests) when Pearson discovered the "correlation coefficient"
> >and (Sir) Ronald fisher founded statistical theory.
>
> From which we can safely conclude that there is no connection between
> the begining of statistical theory and psychology, and no connection
> between the discovery if correlation coeficients and psychology, and
> that neither Fisher nor Pearson had anything to do with IQ tests,
> psychology, or statistical theory.

[Hammond]
Just saying there isn't doesn't mean there isn't.
Advance an argument or get the fcuk outta here,
we're not interested in the fact tha mommy told you
you were an authority.

>
> >> You quoted NO physical or bilogical science credentials whatsoever
> >
> >[Hammond]
> >TMG dicovered that Dembski besides having 7 college degrees in
> >other subjects, has actually done post graduate work
> >in PHYSICS at the University of Chicago:
> >
> > http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=19115
> >
> >(which contains an excellent photo of Dembski btw.)
>
> So you admit that even people who want to pretend that a scientists
> supposrts their crusade for ignorance aren't pretending he has any
> qualifications as a biologist.

[Hammond]
Biology? whaddaru kiddin.... Biology is only "stamp collecting"
compared to the hard sciences. Dembski has 7 degrees, including
a Phd in mathematics... he could take a degree in biology in his
sleep... so could I.

[Hammond]
I know mommy told you you were a big shot so you still
think all you have to do is say something is so and the
world should believe you.... unfortunately, I think you're
a no account punk, and if you can't post a factual
argument for your opinons, they mean nothing to me.

====================================
   SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
        1st mirror site:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
        2nd mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
     new site (under construction):
http://home.comcast.net/~proof-of-god
====================================

Relevant Pages

  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >>and fisher were working on the Statistical theory of Intelligence ... > From which we can safely conclude that there is no connection between ... Biology is only "stamp collecting" ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >and fisher were working on the Statistical theory of Intelligence ... the begining of statistical theory and psychology, ... >> overtones like linguistics of human languages do), ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
    ... >and fisher were working on the Statistical theory of Intelligence ... the begining of statistical theory and psychology, ... >> overtones like linguistics of human languages do), ...
    (sci.math)