Re: More about the sum of odd numbers
From: Brian Quincy Hutchings (QncyMI_at_netscape.net)
Date: 10/09/04
- Next message: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Previous message: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: New paper, algebraic integers, Galois Theory"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Re: More about the sum of odd numbers"
- Next in thread: lasse_rempe_at_yahoo.de: "Re: More about the sum of odd numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 9 Oct 2004 15:48:30 -0700
as was said, that is nonsense;
evenness is indepenbdent of base.
try it in base-1!
dwb1729@yahoo.com (David Bandel) wrote in message news:<a88af92f.0410081913.28f9e7c3@posting.google.com>...
> 3 is odd modulo 2 but it is even modulo 3. It all depends on which
> form of the number 3 you wish to use.
--ils duces d'Enron!
http://larouchepub.com
- Next message: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: Deep Thoughts # 17: Liar Paradox is a Formal Metamathematical Theorem"
- Previous message: Brian Quincy Hutchings: "Re: New paper, algebraic integers, Galois Theory"
- In reply to: David Bandel: "Re: More about the sum of odd numbers"
- Next in thread: lasse_rempe_at_yahoo.de: "Re: More about the sum of odd numbers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]