Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Previous message: alexV: "Re: FBI SADISM, PERVERSION, MENTAL TORTURE and BLATANT human rights violations"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:17:08 +0100
Eray "are there integers with an infinite number of digits?" Ozkural wrote:
>>
>> If there are ones that aren't complicated, perhaps you could post
>> one of them.
>
> There is at least one model, that is not complicated, and easily
> formulated with computability in the limit.
Are you going to show us?
-- Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root, 88-9" Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Previous message: alexV: "Re: FBI SADISM, PERVERSION, MENTAL TORTURE and BLATANT human rights violations"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|