Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor
From: Robin Chapman (rjc_at_ivorynospamtower.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: 10/10/04
- Next message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 18:16:14 +0100
Eray "are there integers with an infinite number of digits?" Ozkural wrote:
> Torkel Franzen <torkel@sm.luth.se> wrote in message
> news:<vcb1xg83fv6.fsf@beta19.sm.ltu.se>...
>> jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) writes:
>>
>> > *From* an intellectual vacuum, not *as* one. Let's watch them
>> > prepositions, shall we?
>>
>> As in "sworn to you"?
>
> I thought I made it awfully clear that by "from an intellectual
> vacuum", I meant the subject's relation to physics, biology, and
> complexity sciences in general.
It's still just abuse.
-- Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html "Lacan, Jacques, 79, 91-92; mistakes his penis for a square root, 88-9" Francis Wheen, _How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World_
- Next message: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- In reply to: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Next in thread: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Reply: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
