Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?
From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz (spamtrap_at_library.lspace.org.invalid)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Natural Densities are Probabilities"
- In reply to: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Next in thread: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 21:48:23 -0300
In <39d6e584.0410081125.54bd8b57@posting.google.com>, on 10/08/2004
at 12:25 PM, troubled6man@yahoo.com (J.E.) said:
>Your comments are very vague. People are introducing unobservable
>phenomena to make theories where observations are consistent with the
>matter we do see? Why? What is the point?
The point is that they believe that they can devise better theories by
doing so.
>As for not doing better than GR, I've seen claims of better results
>from people whose work I don't understand.
Well, if NASA doesn't kill it there's some instrumentation that might
get us closer to an answer. I know that B-D didn't fair too well when
tested, but that could change with more accurate measurements. IAC,
the real problem is Quantum Gravity, and I'm not aware of any current
approach that comes remotely close to your criteria.
-- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org
- Next message: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Previous message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Natural Densities are Probabilities"
- In reply to: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Next in thread: J.E.: "Re: Skolem's Paradox and why is math the way it is?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|