Re: Carom billiards as a stochastic process
From: *** T. Winter (***.Winter_at_cwi.nl)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- In reply to: Mathieu Bouville: "Re: Carom billiards as a stochastic process"
- Next in thread: Mathieu Bouville: "Re: Carom billiards as a stochastic process"
- Reply: Mathieu Bouville: "Re: Carom billiards as a stochastic process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 10:56:00 GMT
In article <20f01501.0410102253.666c338@posting.google.com> mbouvill@engin.umich.edu (Mathieu Bouville) writes:
...
> What I am trying to do requires very little knowledge of the game. I
> consider that with the balls in a given position, the shot has some
> known probability to be successful.
Perhaps, although I doubt it. But even *if* there are probabilities
involved, the probability depends on the player.
-- *** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131 home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
- Next message: Eray Ozkural exa: "Re: Zenkin's paper on Cantor"
- Previous message: Jesse F. Hughes: "Re: Galois Theory ok, weird lie from sci.math"
- In reply to: Mathieu Bouville: "Re: Carom billiards as a stochastic process"
- Next in thread: Mathieu Bouville: "Re: Carom billiards as a stochastic process"
- Reply: Mathieu Bouville: "Re: Carom billiards as a stochastic process"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]