Re: the Mathematics of Chess
From: Ioannis (morpheus_at_olympus.mons)
Date: 10/11/04
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Groups of order 30, 105 and pqr"
- Previous message: Michael Knudsen: "Re: Representations of affine type A"
- In reply to: Jon Slaughter: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Next in thread: Conya: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Reply: Conya: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 15:28:35 +0300
Jon Slaughter wrote:
[snip]
> Anything that has patterns is mathematics.
> Mathematics, in its most general scope, covers everything that has
> intelligence...
Except Bach's music, that is.
> Mathematics is basic on logic, and if something isn't
> logical, its not really math. But if it is, then one could possibly study
> it under a "mathematical microscope".
Trying to study patterns in Bach's music, is a very sure way to the
loony bin, cause it's the chicken and egg problem: The composer wasn't a
mathematician, but his music contains nothing BUT math. And the music is
beautiful, as well.
[snip]
-- I. N. Galidakis --- http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/
- Next message: Robin Chapman: "Re: Groups of order 30, 105 and pqr"
- Previous message: Michael Knudsen: "Re: Representations of affine type A"
- In reply to: Jon Slaughter: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Next in thread: Conya: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Reply: Conya: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Reply: robert j. kolker: "Re: the Mathematics of Chess"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|